A child-centred research checklist to improve the design and reporting of paediatric research studies: A descriptive mixed methods study

被引:4
|
作者
Foster, Mandie [1 ,2 ]
Whitehead, L. Lisa [2 ,3 ]
O'Sullivan, Therese A. [4 ]
Hill, Julie [4 ]
Morelius, Evalotte [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, Sch Clin Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Otago, Ctr Postgrad Nursing Studies, Christchurch, New Zealand
[4] Edith Cowan Univ, Nutr & Hlth Innovat Res Inst, Sch Hlth & Med Sci, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[5] Linkopings Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Caring Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
Children; Checklist; Delphi technique; Ethics; Interdisciplinary research; Paediatric; Research; HEALTH-CARE; PARTICIPATION; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104958
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: No internationally developed child-centred research checklist is currently available to enhance the quality and transparency of the development, reporting and evaluation of research undertaken with children. Objective: To develop an internationally relevant, expert informed child-centred research checklist. Design: A descriptive mixed methods study was undertaken in five sequential phases, including a Delphi component. Setting(s): Academic/international context. Methods: This study involved five sequential stages: 1. Literature review using four databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO) and analysis to identify key themes in child-centred research (January 2020). 2. Generate a questionnaire based on the key themes for international experts in child research to provide their opinions on what should be included in a child-centred research checklist (March 2020). 3. Inductive thematic analysis of the experts' responses to generate the initial draft checklist (June 2020). 4. The checklist progressed through three rounds of Delphi study for a wider range of experts to provide their consensus on what a child-centred research checklist should contain (August 2020-February 2021). 5. Refinement of the child-centred research checklist based on the Delphi study (March 2021-November 2022). Results: A total of 160 articles met the inclusion criteria for review and were considered in the development of a 10-item open-ended questionnaire, adapted for four age-brackets (0-1 yrs., 2-4 yrs., 5-10 yrs., >11 yrs). Responses from 14 experts across 10 countries generated 205 generic statements and 76 examples to inform a child- centred research checklist. Following this, 158 experts from eleven disciplines across 18 countries participated in the three round Delphi study (38 % retention rate over the three rounds). The final checklist includes 11 statements and 17 examples represented under three categories of "child-parent consent, assent and dissent", "code of conduct" and "child focused methods". Conclusion: The child-centred research checklist was generated from a mixed methods study undertaken in five sequential phases, with input by 172 experts from 11 disciplines across 19 countries. The child-centred research checklist is the first international, expert informed tool to support good quality and transparent child-centred research. We call on researchers, clinicians, journal editors, organisations, and ethics committees to use this checklist for future research with children. The next phase of this project is engagement with children and their families to refine the checklist. Tweetable abstract: New checklist to support good quality child research practices @IFNAorg.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PROGRESSING A CHILD-CENTRED RESEARCH AGENDA IN TOURISM STUDIES
    Canosa, Antonia
    Graham, Anne
    Wilson, Erica
    TOURISM ANALYSIS, 2019, 24 (01): : 95 - 100
  • [2] Checklist for Reporting Results Using Observational Descriptive Studies as Research Designs. The MInCir Initiative
    Manterola, Carlos
    Otzen, Tamara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY, 2017, 35 (01): : 72 - 76
  • [3] Mixed methods research: An opportunity to improve our studies and our research skills
    Molina-Azorin, Jose F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2016, 25 (02) : 37 - 38
  • [5] MIXED METHODS RESEARCH DESIGN FOR PRAGMATIC PSYCHOANALYTIC STUDIES
    Tillman, Jane G.
    Clemence, A. Jill
    Stevens, Jennifer L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHOANALYTIC ASSOCIATION, 2011, 59 (05) : 1023 - 1040
  • [6] Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC)
    Lawson, Daeria O.
    Puljak, Livia
    Pieper, Dawid
    Schandelmaier, Stefan
    Collins, Gary S.
    Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
    Moher, David
    Tugwell, Peter
    Welch, Vivian A.
    Samaan, Zainab
    Thombs, Brett D.
    Norskov, Anders K.
    Jakobsen, Janus C.
    Allison, David B.
    Mayo-Wilson, Evan
    Young, Taryn
    Chan, An-Wen
    Briel, Matthias
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Thabane, Lehana
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [7] Quality of Reporting Using Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study Criteria in Chiropractic Mixed Methods Research: A Methodological Review
    Emary, Peter C.
    Stuber, Kent J.
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    Oremus, Mark
    Nolet, Paul S.
    V. Nash, Jennifer
    Bauman, Craig A.
    Ciraco, Carla
    Couban, Rachel J.
    Busse, Jason W.
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 46 (03) : 152 - 161
  • [8] Child-centred framing through design research: a framework for analysing children's 'dream wheelchair' designs to elicit meaning and elevate their voice
    Shaw, Cara
    Bernardi, Francesca
    Nickpour, Farnaz
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 19 (01) : 154 - 166
  • [9] Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study
    Khurram Mustafa
    Carolyn Czoski Murray
    Emma Nicklin
    Adam Glaser
    Jacqueline Andrews
    BMC Medical Education, 18
  • [10] Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study
    Mustafa, Khurram
    Murray, Carolyn Czoski
    Nicklin, Emma
    Glaser, Adam
    Andrews, Jacqueline
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 18