Artificial intelligence versus conventional methods for RGP lens fitting in keratoconus

被引:1
|
作者
Abadou, Jeremy
Dahan, Simon [2 ]
Knoeri, Juliette [1 ]
Leveziel, Loic [1 ]
Bouheraoua, Nacim [1 ]
Borderie, Vincent M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sorbonne Univ, Hop Natl 15 20, Transplantat & Therapies Innovantes Corne, Grp Rech Clin 32, Paris, France
[2] Kings Coll London, Dept Biomed Engn & Imaging Sci, London, England
来源
CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE | 2025年 / 48卷 / 01期
关键词
Keratoconus; Deep learning; Optical coherence tomography; Corneal topography; Contact lens fitting; Rigid gas permeable lens; VALIDATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.clae.2024.102321
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: To compare the efficiency of three artificial intelligence (AI) frameworks (Standard Machine Learning (ML), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Convolution Neural Networks (CNN)) with a reference method (Mean radius of curvature (K)) to predict the posterior radius of curvature of the best-fitted rigid contact lens (RCBFL) in keratoconus eyes. Methods: This retrospective study included 197 keratoconus eyes of 135 patients fitted with Rose K2 (R) (Menicon (R), Nagoya, Japan) rigid contact lenses with one or more topographies available (MS39 (R), CSO (R), Ferrara, Italy) between January 2020 and September 2022. Two types of topographic data (indices and reconstructed maps from raw data) were used for AI analysis. Three distinct approaches were utilized for leveraging AI: Standard ML methods and MLPs based on topographic indices and CNNs based on topographic maps (i.e., corneal thickness, sagittal, and tangential maps). Seventeen AI framework's accuracies were compared with the r2 determination coefficient of linear regression between predicted and best-fitted radii. Framework accuracies were compared with the Fisher z-transformation of Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: In multiple linear regression, only three topographic indices (i.e., 3- & 5-mm mean K and Kmax) were significantly associated with RCBFL (p <= 0.0001). Compared with the reference method (mean-K; r(2) = 0.36), a significantly better RCBFL prediction was achieved with Random Forest using the three topographic indices, MLP using all indices, ResNet18 CNN using anterior topographic maps and CNNs using combined parameters (0.69 <= r(2) <= 0.80; p < 0.05). The best accuracy was obtained with the EfficientNetB0 CNN trained with three maps (r(2) = 0.80). Conclusions: Artificial intelligence methods, particularly CNNs, with corneal topography data of MS39 (R) topographer, have demonstrated superiority over conventional approaches in predicting the posterior curvature radius of Rose K2 (R) rigid contact lenses in patients with keratoconus.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Role of Conventional Methods and Artificial Intelligence in the Wastewater Treatment: A Comprehensive Review
    Altowayti, Wahid Ali Hamood
    Shahir, Shafinaz
    Othman, Norzila
    Eisa, Taiseer Abdalla Elfadil
    Yafooz, Wael M. S.
    Al-Dhaqm, Arafat
    Soon, Chan Yong
    Yahya, Izzati Binti
    Rahim, Nur Anis Natasha Binti Che
    Abaker, Mohammed
    Ali, Abdulalem
    PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (09)
  • [22] Optical quality for keratoconic eyes with conventional RGP lens and simulated, customised contact lens corrections: a comparison
    Jinabhai, Amit
    Charman, W. Neil
    O'Donnell, Clare
    Radhakrishnan, Hema
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2012, 32 (03) : 200 - 212
  • [23] Use of elevation topography in rigid gas permeable lens fitting of keratoconus
    Lee, SM
    McLeod, SD
    Hwang, DG
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U311 - U311
  • [24] CONTACT-LENS FITTING RELATION AND VISUAL-ACUITY IN KERATOCONUS
    ZADNIK, K
    MUTT, DO
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1987, 64 (09): : 698 - 702
  • [25] Contact Lens Fitting in Patients with Keratoconus - A Retrospective Assessment of 200 Patients
    Richter, Kathrin
    Jullien, Theresia
    Kluehspies, Ulrike
    Langenbucher, Achim
    Seitz, Berthold
    Eppig, Timo
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2022, 239 (09) : 1155 - 1163
  • [26] Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?
    Romero-Jimenez, Miguel
    Santodomingo-Rubido, Jacinto
    Flores-Rodriguez, Patricia
    Gonzalez-Meijome, Jose Manuel
    CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2013, 36 (01): : 45 - 48
  • [27] Use Of Artificial Intelligence Versus Traditional Methods In The Diagnosis Of COPD
    Bastidas Goyes, A. R.
    Botero Rosas, D.
    Fajardo Latorre, L. P.
    Labrador Lopez, C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 193
  • [28] Prediction of local scour around bridge piers: artificial-intelligence-based modeling versus conventional regression methods
    Reda Abd El-Hady Rady
    Applied Water Science, 2020, 10
  • [29] Prediction of local scour around bridge piers: artificial-intelligence-based modeling versus conventional regression methods
    Abd El-Hady Rady, Reda
    APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2020, 10 (02)
  • [30] Validation of lens thicknes (LT) measurement. Artificial intelligence versus clinician
    Lucena, Raiza Algernon Perez
    Roca, Daniela
    De La Cruz, Jose
    Arteaga, Andrea
    Gonzalez, Ana
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)