Artificial intelligence versus conventional methods for RGP lens fitting in keratoconus

被引:1
|
作者
Abadou, Jeremy
Dahan, Simon [2 ]
Knoeri, Juliette [1 ]
Leveziel, Loic [1 ]
Bouheraoua, Nacim [1 ]
Borderie, Vincent M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sorbonne Univ, Hop Natl 15 20, Transplantat & Therapies Innovantes Corne, Grp Rech Clin 32, Paris, France
[2] Kings Coll London, Dept Biomed Engn & Imaging Sci, London, England
来源
CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE | 2025年 / 48卷 / 01期
关键词
Keratoconus; Deep learning; Optical coherence tomography; Corneal topography; Contact lens fitting; Rigid gas permeable lens; VALIDATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.clae.2024.102321
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: To compare the efficiency of three artificial intelligence (AI) frameworks (Standard Machine Learning (ML), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Convolution Neural Networks (CNN)) with a reference method (Mean radius of curvature (K)) to predict the posterior radius of curvature of the best-fitted rigid contact lens (RCBFL) in keratoconus eyes. Methods: This retrospective study included 197 keratoconus eyes of 135 patients fitted with Rose K2 (R) (Menicon (R), Nagoya, Japan) rigid contact lenses with one or more topographies available (MS39 (R), CSO (R), Ferrara, Italy) between January 2020 and September 2022. Two types of topographic data (indices and reconstructed maps from raw data) were used for AI analysis. Three distinct approaches were utilized for leveraging AI: Standard ML methods and MLPs based on topographic indices and CNNs based on topographic maps (i.e., corneal thickness, sagittal, and tangential maps). Seventeen AI framework's accuracies were compared with the r2 determination coefficient of linear regression between predicted and best-fitted radii. Framework accuracies were compared with the Fisher z-transformation of Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: In multiple linear regression, only three topographic indices (i.e., 3- & 5-mm mean K and Kmax) were significantly associated with RCBFL (p <= 0.0001). Compared with the reference method (mean-K; r(2) = 0.36), a significantly better RCBFL prediction was achieved with Random Forest using the three topographic indices, MLP using all indices, ResNet18 CNN using anterior topographic maps and CNNs using combined parameters (0.69 <= r(2) <= 0.80; p < 0.05). The best accuracy was obtained with the EfficientNetB0 CNN trained with three maps (r(2) = 0.80). Conclusions: Artificial intelligence methods, particularly CNNs, with corneal topography data of MS39 (R) topographer, have demonstrated superiority over conventional approaches in predicting the posterior curvature radius of Rose K2 (R) rigid contact lenses in patients with keratoconus.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RGP contact lens fitting in keratoconus using FITSCAN technology
    Mandathara, Preeji S.
    Fatima, Mariya
    Taureen, Sobia
    Dumpati, Srikanth
    Ali, Mohd Hasnat
    Rathi, Varsha
    CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2013, 36 (03): : 126 - 129
  • [2] Evaluation of RGP Contact Lens Fitting in Keratoconus Patients Using Hierarchical Fuzzy Model and Genetic Algorithms
    Falahati Marvast, Fatemeh
    Arabalibeik, Hossein
    Alipour, Fatemeh
    Sheikhtaheri, Abbas
    Nouri, Leila
    Soozande, Mehdi
    Yarmahmoodi, Masood
    MEDICINE MEETS VIRTUAL REALITY 22, 2016, 220 : 124 - 129
  • [3] Yield curve fitting with artificial intelligence: a comparison of standard fitting methods with artificial intelligence algorithms
    Posthaus, Achim
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL FINANCE, 2019, 22 (05) : 1 - 23
  • [4] Comparison of flat and steep rigid contact lens fitting methods in keratoconus
    Zadnik, K
    Barr, JT
    Steger-May, K
    Edrington, TB
    McMahon, TT
    Gordon, MO
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2005, 82 (12) : 1014 - 1021
  • [5] A NEW FITTING METHOD OF CUSTOM DESIGNING RGP LENSES FOR KERATOCONUS USING A VIDEOKERATOGRAPH
    ITOI, M
    TERRY, R
    SHIOBARA, M
    HOLDEN, BA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1994, 35 (04) : 1780 - 1780
  • [6] Contact lens fitting after keratoplasty for keratoconus
    Prazeres, S.
    Malet, F.
    Colin, J.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2008, 31 (09): : 849 - 854
  • [7] Rose K contact lens fitting for keratoconus
    Ozkurt Y.B.
    Sengor T.
    Kurna S.
    Evciman T.
    Acikgoz S.
    Haboǧlu M.
    Aki S.
    International Ophthalmology, 2008, 28 (6) : 395 - 398
  • [8] Rigid contact lens fitting relationships in keratoconus
    Edrington, TB
    Szczotka, LB
    Barr, JT
    Achtenberg, JF
    Burger, DS
    Janoff, AM
    Olafsson, HE
    Chun, MW
    Boyle, JW
    Gordon, MO
    Zadnik, K
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1999, 76 (10) : 692 - 699
  • [9] Artificial intelligence for detecting keratoconus
    Vandevenne, Magali M. S.
    Favuzza, Eleonora
    Veta, Mitko
    Lucenteforte, Ersilia
    Berendschot, Tos T. J. M.
    Mencucci, Rita
    Nuijts, Rudy Mma
    Virgili, Gianni
    Dickman, Mor M.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, (11):
  • [10] Artificial dermatitis versus artificial intelligence: Detecting etiology with Google Lens
    Ayhan, Erhan
    Alagoz, Yusuf
    SKIN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 30 (06)