Impact of 3D printing orientation on accuracy, properties, cost, and time efficiency of additively manufactured dental models: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Alghauli, Mohammed Ahmed [1 ]
Almuzaini, Sarah A. [2 ]
Aljohani, Rola [3 ]
Alqutaibi, Ahmed Yaseen [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] IBB Univ, Fac Dent, Prosthodont Dept, Ibb 70270, Yemen
[2] Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal Univ, Coll Dent, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
[3] Taibah Univ, Coll Dent, Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia
[4] Taibah Univ, Coll Dent, Substitut Dent Sci Dept, Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia
来源
BMC ORAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Resin material; Dental models; Build-up angle; Printing direction; Accuracy; Surface quality; Printing speed; Energy saving; DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY; PLASTER;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-024-05365-5
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe evidence on the effect of printing orientation on dimensional accuracy and properties of resinous dental models is unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess the impact of printing orientation on the accuracy and properties of additively manufactured resinous dental models, besides the cost, material consumption, and time efficiency at different orientations.MethodsA comprehensive web search (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane) was performed in July 2024 without language restrictions. The included studies were assessed using the modified consort statement for laboratory studies on dental materials. The outcomes were accuracy and surface quality, besides the cost and time efficiency of additively manufactured dental models printed in different directions.ResultsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, 14 records were included. Most records favored horizontally printed models with minor controversies regarding accuracy, material consumption, time, and cost efficiency. While orientation can influence surface quality, it is often more significantly affected by factors such as the printing technology used, the material properties, and the layer thickness.ConclusionsHorizontal orientation has proven to be the most efficient for producing dental models, particularly for single-model manufacturing, due to its superior time and cost savings. However, large-scale and overnight massive production favors the vertical orientation since the platform accommodates twice to triple the models' numbers as horizontal orientation. The majority of studies favor horizontal orientation for its accuracy.Choosing the optimal orientation in additive manufacturing not only ensures precision of dental models, improving the fit of restorations and prostheses, but also leads to significant reductions in production time, material usage, and energy consumption, ultimately minimizing environmental impact.ConclusionsHorizontal orientation has proven to be the most efficient for producing dental models, particularly for single-model manufacturing, due to its superior time and cost savings. However, large-scale and overnight massive production favors the vertical orientation since the platform accommodates twice to triple the models' numbers as horizontal orientation. The majority of studies favor horizontal orientation for its accuracy.Choosing the optimal orientation in additive manufacturing not only ensures precision of dental models, improving the fit of restorations and prostheses, but also leads to significant reductions in production time, material usage, and energy consumption, ultimately minimizing environmental impact.Trial registrationNot applicable.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of 3D Printing Parameters on the Fatigue Properties of Parts Manufactured by Fused Filament Fabrication: A Review
    Bakhtiari, Hamed
    Aamir, Muhammad
    Tolouei-Rad, Majid
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [42] Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Models for Three-Unit Prostheses Fabricated by Various 3D Printing Technologies
    Yoo, Soo-Yeon
    Kim, Seong-Kyun
    Heo, Seong-Joo
    Koak, Jai-Young
    Kim, Joung-Gyu
    MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (06)
  • [43] Review on advancements in 3D/4D printing for enhancing efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and quality
    Solanki, Ajay
    Ranganath, M. S.
    Singholi, Ajay K. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING - IJIDEM, 2025, 19 (05): : 3153 - 3169
  • [44] Building 3D Printing: The Anisotropy Mechanical Properties and Printing Time
    Xin, Penghao
    Wang, Ziming
    Xi, Wenbo
    Peng, Jingying
    He, Huan
    Tang, Ruifeng
    ADVANCES IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS, 2018, : 535 - 543
  • [45] Assessment of mechanical properties and microstructure of Co-Cr dental alloys manufactured by casting, milling, and 3D printing
    Schettini, Ana
    Pesun, Igor J.
    Franca, Rodrigo
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2025, 133 (03):
  • [46] Comparison of Dental Stone Models and Their 3D Printed Acrylic Replicas for the Accuracy and Mechanical Properties
    Czajkowska, Marta
    Walejewska, Ewa
    Zadrozny, Lukasz
    Wieczorek, Monika
    Swieszkowski, Wojciech
    Wagner, Leopold
    Mijiritsky, Eitan
    Markowski, Jaroslaw
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (18)
  • [47] Accuracy Comparison among 3D-Printing Technologies to Produce Dental Models
    Kim, Jun Ho
    Pinhata-Baptista, Otavio Henrique
    Ayres, Ana Paula
    Berbel da Silva, Renan Lucio
    Lima, Jacqueline Ferreira
    Urbano, Gabriel Sardinha
    No-Cortes, Juliana
    Vasques, Mayra Torres
    Gonzalez Cortes, Arthur Rodriguez
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (17):
  • [48] 3D Printing in Radiation Oncology: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Rooney, M. K.
    Rosenberg, D. M.
    Braunstein, S. E.
    Cunha, J. A. M.
    Damato, A. L.
    Ehler, E.
    Pawlicki, T.
    Robar, J. L.
    Golden, D. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E687 - E687
  • [49] 3D printing in brachytherapy: A systematic review of gynecological applications
    Fahimian, Benjamin P.
    Liu, Wu
    Skinner, Lawrie
    Yu, Amy S.
    Phillips, Tiffany
    Steers, Jennifer M.
    DeMarco, John
    Fraass, Benedick A.
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2023, 22 (04) : 446 - 460
  • [50] 3D printing for heart valve disease: a systematic review
    Volkan Tuncay
    Peter M. A. van Ooijen
    European Radiology Experimental, 3