Risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection of non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors and the effectiveness of complete mucosal closure in high-risk patients

被引:0
|
作者
Shigeta, Kohei [1 ]
Yoshida, Masao [1 ]
Yamamoto, Yoichi [1 ]
Maeda, Yuki [1 ]
Kawata, Noboru [1 ]
Takada, Kazunori [1 ]
Imai, Kenichiro [1 ]
Hotta, Kinichi [1 ]
Sato, Junya [1 ]
Ishiwatari, Hirotoshi [1 ]
Matsubayashi, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Ono, Hiroyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Shizuoka Canc Ctr, Div Endoscopy, 1007 Shimonagakubo,Nagaizumi Cho, Shizuoka 4118777, Japan
关键词
Delayed bleeding; Non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors; Endoscopic resection; Risk factor; Duodenal tumor; THE-SCOPE CLIP; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; PERFORATION; HEMOSTASIS; EFFICACY; DEFECTS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-11447-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Endoscopic resection (ER) of non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (NADETs) is associated with a high incidence of delayed bleeding (DB). While previous reports have identified composite risk factors for delayed adverse events, including both DB and delayed perforation, the specific factors associated with DB remain unclear. This study aimed to identify factors associated with DB after ER of NADETs. Methods This retrospective study included 335 consecutive patients who underwent ER for a NADET between January 2004 and December 2023. Participants were divided into the DB and non-DB groups. We compared baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes between the two groups to identify factors associated with DB. ER included endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) techniques. DB was defined as bleeding that required endoscopic hemostasis or transfusion after ER. Complete mucosal closure (CMC) was defined as the complete closure of the defect with no endoscopically visible exposure of the defect. Results Overall, 128 ESD procedures and 207 non-ESD procedures were performed. DB occurred in 13 patients (3.9%) and its incidence was lower when CMC was achieved (1.1% vs. 13.9%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed the use of antithrombotic agents (odds ratio (OR) 3.8; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-14.6, P = 0.048) and a defect circumference >= 1/2 (OR 6.2; 95% CI 1.2-30.5, P = 0.029) as risk factors for DB, and CMC (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.038-0.95, P = 0.043) as a protective factor. Among the 66 patients with risk factors, including the use of antithrombotic agents and/or a defect circumference >= 1/2, CMC reduced the incidence of DB (4.5% [2/44], vs. 31.8% [7/22], P = 0.005). Conclusion We identified significant factors associated with DB after duodenal ER. Particularly, in patients with risk factors for DB, CMC can reduce the incidence of DB.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1035
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Histopathologic discrepancies between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens in non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors
    Kim, Da Mi
    Kim, Gwang Ha
    Lee, Bong Eun
    Kim, Kyungbin
    Choi, Kyung Un
    Hong, Seung Min
    Lee, Moon Won
    Song, Geun Am
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 : 229 - 230
  • [22] Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection
    Shiba, Masatsugu
    Higuchi, Kazuhide
    Kadouchi, Kaori
    Montani, Ai
    Yamamori, Kazuki
    Okazaki, Hirotoshi
    Taguchi, Makiko
    Wada, Tomoko
    Itani, Atsushi
    Watanabe, Toshio
    Tominaga, Kazunari
    Fujiwara, Yoshihiro
    Hayashi, Tomoshige
    Tsumura, Kei
    Arakawa, Tetsuo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 11 (46) : 7335 - 7339
  • [23] Risk factors related to bleeding in gastric tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection
    Cho, CM
    Lee, DS
    Park, CK
    Tak, WY
    Kweon, YO
    Kim, SK
    Choi, YH
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (05) : AB116 - AB116
  • [24] Risk factors related to bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection of gastric tumors
    Jung, Jintae
    Kim, Ho Gak
    Han, Jimin
    Choi, Joon Hyuk
    Kim, Eun Y.
    Kwon, Joong Goo
    Lee, Chang-Hyeong
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) : AB174 - AB174
  • [25] Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection
    Masatsugu Shiba
    Kazuhide Higuchi
    Kaori Kadouchi
    Ai Montani
    Kazuki Yamamori
    Hirotoshi Okazaki
    Makiko Taguchi
    Tomoko Wada
    Atsushi Itani
    Toshio Watanabe
    Kazunari Tominaga
    Yoshihiro Fujiwara
    Tomoshige Hayashi
    Kei Tsumura
    Tetsuo Arakawa
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005, (46) : 7335 - 7339
  • [26] Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Non-ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors ≤20 mm A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis
    Yin, Zhikun
    Li, Ji
    Yang, Weilin
    Huang, Weifeng
    Xu, Dong
    Lei, Xiaoyi
    Zhang, Jinyan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 57 (09) : 928 - 936
  • [27] Short and Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors
    Hara, Yuko
    Goda, Kenichi
    Dobashi, Akira
    Sumiyama, Kazuki
    Tajiri, Hisao
    Mitsuishi, Takehiro
    Hirooka, Shinichi
    Ikegami, Masahiro
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) : AB323 - AB323
  • [28] Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Identifying High-Risk Patients
    Bendall, Oliver
    James, Joel
    Pawlak, Katarzyna M.
    Ishaq, Sauid
    Tau, J. Andy
    Suzuki, Noriko
    Bollipo, Steven
    Siau, Keith
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 14 : 477 - 492
  • [29] Risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection for large colorectal tumors
    Fukunaga, Shusci
    Saito, Yutaka
    Matsuda, Takahisa
    Nakajima, Takeshi
    Kikuchi, Tsuyoshi
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (05) : AB309 - AB309
  • [30] Risk Factors for Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection for Large Colorectal Tumors
    Matsumoto, Minori
    Fukunaga, Shusei
    Saito, Yutaka
    Matsuda, Takahisa
    Nakajima, Takeshi
    Sakamoto, Taku
    Tamai, Naoto
    Kikuchi, Tsuyoshi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 42 (11) : 1028 - 1034