Crop Mixtures Influence Fall Armyworm Infestation and Natural Enemy Abundance in Maize-based Intercropping Systems

被引:2
|
作者
Peter, Emmanuel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yusuf, Abdullahi [2 ]
Subramanian, Sevgan [1 ]
Krueger, Kerstin [2 ]
Karlsson Green, Kristina [4 ]
Anderson, Peter [4 ]
Torto, Baldwyn [1 ]
Tamiru, Amanuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Ctr Insect Physiol & Ecol icipe, POB 30772, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
[2] Univ Pretoria, Dept Zool & Entomol, ZA-0028 Pretoria, South Africa
[3] Fed Univ Gashua, Fac Agr, Dept Agron, PMB 1005, Gashua, Yobe, Nigeria
[4] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Plant Protect Biol, Box 190, Lomma 23422, Sweden
关键词
<italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic>; Intercropping; Natural enemies; Maize; Agroecology; Integrated pest management; SPODOPTERA-FRUGIPERDA; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; SMITH LEPIDOPTERA; HOST PLANTS; PUSH-PULL; MANAGEMENT; PARASITOIDS; NOCTUIDAE; OPTIONS; PESTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10343-024-01061-0
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), causes significant damage to maize, threatening the food security and livelihood of millions of smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Crop diversification has been recommended as an ecologically sustainable FAW control option. However, limited information is available on the impacts of companion plants and their control mechanisms against FAW in SSA, being a relatively new pest to the region. Building upon our earlier laboratory study, which elucidated how edible companion intercrops effectively reduce FAW infestation, we conducted field experiments in Kenya to assess the effectiveness of intercropping maize with beans, groundnut, cassava and sweet potato under realistic field conditions. Growing maize with these intercrops consistently resulted in fewer FAW eggs, larvae and lower plant infestation compared to maize monoculture except with cassava. Additionally, maize under these intercrops experienced low FAW damage and higher crop yield compared to maize monoculture. Maize growth stages significantly influenced the population of FAW eggs and larvae, with a peak observed between vegetative stages V4 and V10. Furthermore, intercropped maize plots exhibited a higher presence of FAW predators, such as lady beetles and earwigs. Correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between temperature, relative humidity, and the population of FAW life stages and natural enemies at the experimental sites. Therefore, intercropping maize with beans, sweet potato, and groundnuts can be incorporated into an integrated FAW management strategy to sustainably control the pest in real farming conditions. These findings are particularly relevant for small-scale farmers in Africa and beyond, who cannot afford expensive FAW control using insecticides.
引用
收藏
页码:1491 / 1505
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Trichoderma atroviride, a maize root associated fungus, increases the parasitism rate of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda by its natural enemy Campoletis sonorensis
    Angel Contreras-Cornejo, Hexon
    del-Val, Ek
    Macias-Rodriguez, Lourdes
    Alarcon, Alejandro
    Gonzalez-Esquivel, Carlos E.
    Larsen, John
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2018, 122 : 196 - 202
  • [22] Effects of conservation agriculture maize-based cropping systems on soil health and crop performance in New Caledonia
    Kulagowski, Remy
    Thoumazeau, Alexis
    Leopold, Audrey
    Lienhard, Pascal
    Boulakia, Stephane
    Metay, Aurelie
    Sturm, Tobias
    Tixier, Philippe
    Brauman, Alain
    Fogliani, Bruno
    Tivet, Florent
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2021, 212
  • [23] Fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) in maize cropping systems in Benin: abundance, damage, predatory ants and potential control
    Dassou, Anicet G.
    Idohou, Rodrigue
    Azandeme-Hounmalon, Ginette Y.
    Sabi-Sabi, Amadou
    Houndete, Jacques
    Silvie, Pierre
    Dansi, Alexandre
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TROPICAL INSECT SCIENCE, 2021, 41 (04) : 2627 - 2636
  • [24] Crop productivity, soil health, and energy dynamics of Indian Himalayan intensified organic maize-based systems
    Singh, Raghavendra
    Babu, Subhash
    Avasthe, R. K.
    Yadav, Gulab Singh
    Das, Anup
    Mohapatra, K. P.
    Kumar, Amit
    Singh, Vinod K.
    Chandra, Puran
    INTERNATIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH, 2021, 9 (02) : 260 - 270
  • [25] Benefits and challenges of crop rotations in maize-based conservation agriculture (CA) cropping systems of southern Africa
    Thierfelder, Christian
    Cheesman, Stephanie
    Rusinamhodzi, Leonard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 11 (02) : 108 - 124
  • [26] Agronomic Factors Influencing Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) Infestation and Damage and Its Co-Occurrence with Stemborers in Maize Cropping Systems in Kenya
    Mutyambai, Daniel Munyao
    Niassy, Saliou
    Calatayud, Paul-Andre
    Subramanian, Sevgan
    INSECTS, 2022, 13 (03)
  • [27] Crop protection in European maize-based cropping systems: Current practices and recommendations for innovative Integrated Pest Management
    Vasileiadis, V. P.
    Sattin, M.
    Otto, S.
    Veres, A.
    Palinkas, Z.
    Ban, R.
    Pons, X.
    Kudsk, P.
    van der Weide, R.
    Czembor, E.
    Moonen, A. C.
    Kiss, J.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2011, 104 (07) : 533 - 540
  • [28] Does crop diversity contribute to dietary diversity? Evidence from integration of vegetables into maize-based farming systems
    Rajendran S.
    Afari-Sefa V.
    Shee A.
    Bocher T.
    Bekunda M.
    dominick I.
    Lukumay P.J.
    Agriculture & Food Security, 6 (1):
  • [29] Do intercropping and mineral nitrogen fertilizer affect weed community structures in low-input maize-based cropping systems?
    Namatsheve, Talent
    Cardinael, Remi
    Chikowo, Regis
    Corbeels, Marc
    Rugare, Joyful Tatenda
    Mabasa, Stanford
    Ripoche, Aude
    CROP PROTECTION, 2024, 176
  • [30] Adoption potential of hedgerow intercropping in maize-based cropping systems in the highlands of western Kenya .1. Background and agronomic evaluation
    Shepherd, KD
    Ndufa, JK
    Ohlsson, E
    Sjogren, H
    Swinkels, R
    EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1997, 33 (02) : 197 - 209