Estimation of weed distribution for site-specific weed management-can Gaussian copula reduce the smoothing effect?

PurposeCreating spatial weed distribution maps as the basis for site-specific weed management (SSWM) requires determining the occurrence and densities of weeds at georeferenced grid points. To achieve a field-wide distribution map, the weed distribution between the sampling points needs to be predicted. The aim of this study was to determine the best combination of grid sampling design and spatial interpolation technique to improve prediction accuracy. Gaussian copula as alternative method was tested to overcome challenges associated with interpolating weed densities such as smoothing effects.MethodsThe quality of weed distribution maps created using combinations of different sampling grids and interpolation methods was assessed: Inverse Distance Weighting, different geostatistical approaches, and Nearest Neighbor Interpolation. For this comparison, the weed distribution and densities in four fields were assessed using three sampling grids with different resolutions and arrangements: Random vs. regular arrangement of 40 grid points, and a combination of both grid types (fine grid).ResultsThe best prediction of weed distribution was achieved with the Kriging interpolation models based on weed data sampled on the fine grid. In contrast, the lowest performance was observed using the regular grid and the Nearest Neighbor Interpolation. A patchy distribution of weeds did not affect the prediction quality.ConclusionUsing the Gaussian copula kriging did not result in a reduction of the smoothing effect, which still represents a challenge when employing spatial interpolation methods for SSWM. However, using a randomly distributed raster with a fine resolution could further optimize the precision of weed distribution maps.