The Genetic Information and Family Testing (GIFT) study: trial design and protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Katz, Steven J. [1 ,3 ]
Abrahamse, Paul [2 ]
Hofer, Tim P. [1 ]
Courser, Rebecca R. [1 ]
Hodan, Rachel [7 ]
Tocco, Rachel S. [4 ]
Rios-Ventura, Sonia [5 ]
Ward, Kevin C. [8 ]
Hamilton, Ann S. [9 ]
Kurian, Allison W. [5 ,6 ]
An, Lawrence C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychiat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Stanford, CA USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Stanford, CA USA
[7] Stanford Hlth Care, Canc Genet, Stanford, CA USA
[8] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Atlanta, GA USA
[9] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Prevent Med, Los Angeles, CA 90031 USA
关键词
Cascade; Genetic; Testing; Hereditary; Syndromes; CANCER; OPPORTUNITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-025-13744-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThere is pressing need to develop and evaluate clinically sound approaches to supporting the engagement between patients who have inherited cancer susceptibility and their relatives who may share it. Identifying and engaging patients with an inherited cancer susceptibility in the community is a potentially powerful strategy to reduce the gap in genetic risk evaluation for their families. The goal of the Genetic Information and Family Testing (GIFT) Study is to engage patients about inherited cancer susceptibility and provide support and services to their relatives to initiate genetic risk evaluation (including choice of home genetic testing).Methods/designWe are conducting a population-based, 2 x 2 factorial cluster-randomized clinical trial to implement and evaluate a direct-to-family, virtual, personalized, family-centered communication and decision-making tool: the Family Genetic Health Program. We use a unique SEER-based data infrastructure that we pioneered to identify patients diagnosed with cancer in the states of Georgia and California who carry a pathogenic variant (PV) in clinically tested cancer susceptibility gene. Eligible patients are offered enrollment into the trial and can invite their eligible first- and second-degree relatives to enroll. The index subject is randomized, and relatives are then cluster randomized by family. Participants in all arms receive some level of intervention, including at least the web-based platform with information about genetic testing and, for the relatives, an option to receive genetic testing through the study platform. We study the effects of two intervention design features: (1) the level of personalized family genetic risk navigation support: a technology-assisted, personally tailored patient and family member education and communication tool vs. the tool plus direct assistance from a lay human navigator); and (2) the cost of the genetic test offered to the relatives ($50 vs. free).DiscussionGIFT is a blueprint for how a virtual cascade genetic risk program can be delivered in the community, through a population-based approach to patients and relatives in families with hereditary cancer syndromes. The vision, experiences, and findings from GIFT will inform next-generation implementation science and the results will pertain to stakeholders interested in a population-based approach to cascade genetic risk evaluation.Trial registrationNCT05552664 registered at Clincaltrials.gov September 20, 2022.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Design and Testing of a Protocol to Study Varnishes Intended to Protect Graphic Works
    Garcia, Marta Durban
    Arias, Teresa Espejo
    Lopez Montes, Ana Maria
    Garcia, Maria del Rosario Blanc
    STUDIES IN CONSERVATION, 2021, 66 (02) : 90 - 97
  • [32] Influence of Genetic Polymorphisms on the Effect of High-and Standard-Dose Clopidogrel After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention The GIFT (Genotype Information and Functional Testing) Study
    Price, Matthew J.
    Murray, Sarah S.
    Angiolillo, Dominick J.
    Lillie, Elizabeth
    Smith, Erin N.
    Tisch, Rebecca L.
    Schork, Nicholas J.
    Teirstein, Paul S.
    Topol, Eric J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (22) : 1928 - 1937
  • [33] Genetic testing: Are family physicians ready?
    Weber, R
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1996, 53 (06) : 1976 - &
  • [34] Cascade genetic testing in a large family
    不详
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1996, 164 (08) : 474 - 474
  • [35] Genetic Testing Is Beneficial to the Entire Family
    Verma, Meghna
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 15 (09): : 1224 - 1224
  • [36] Family psychoeducation for major depressive disorder – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Nina Timmerby
    Stephen F. Austin
    Kristian Ussing
    Per Bech
    Claudio Csillag
    Trials, 17
  • [37] Family psychoeducation for major depressive disorder - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Timmerby, Nina
    Austin, Stephen F.
    Ussing, Kristian
    Bech, Per
    Csillag, Claudio
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [38] A TEST DESIGN METHODOLOGY FOR PROTOCOL TESTING
    SARIKAYA, B
    VONBOCHMANN, G
    CERNY, E
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1987, 13 (05) : 518 - 531
  • [39] The Importance of a Genetic Evaluation of Prospective Ovum Donors A Study of Family History and Genetic Carrier Testing
    Basile, Joyce E.
    Donnenfeld, Alan E.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 56 (9-10) : 415 - 420
  • [40] The communication of genetic information: The family perspective
    Kent, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1998, 6 : 25 - 25