Wave height forecast method with uncertainty quantification based on Gaussian process regression

被引:0
|
作者
Zi-lu Ouyang [1 ]
Chao-fan Li [1 ]
Ke Zhan [1 ]
Chuan-qing Li [1 ]
Ren-chuan Zhu [2 ]
Zao-jian Zou [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong University,School of Ocean and Civil Engineering
[2] Shanghai Ship and Shipping Research Institute CO.,State Key Laboratory of Navigation and Safety Technology
[3] Ltd,State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong University,undefined
关键词
Wave height forecast; data-driven modeling; Gaussian process regression (GPR); bayes inference; covariance function;
D O I
10.1007/s42241-024-0070-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Wave height forecast (WHF) is of great significance to exploit the marine renewables and improve the safety of ship navigation at sea. With the development of machine learning technology, WHF can be realized in an easy-to-operate and reliable way, which improves its engineering practicability. This paper utilizes a data-driven method, Gaussian process regression (GPR), to model and predict the wave height on the basis of the input and output data. With the help of Bayes inference, the prediction results contain the uncertainty quantification naturally. The comparative studies are carried out to evaluate the performance of GPR based on the simulation data generated by high-order spectral method and the experimental data collected in the deep-water towing tank at the Shanghai Ship and Shipping Research Institute. The results demonstrate that GPR is able to model and predict the wave height with acceptable accuracy, making it a potential choice for engineering application.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:817 / 827
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reference-based Virtual Metrology method with uncertainty evaluation for Material Removal Rate prediction based on Gaussian Process Regression
    Haoshu Cai
    Jianshe Feng
    Qibo Yang
    Fei Li
    Xiang Li
    Jay Lee
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 116 : 1199 - 1211
  • [22] Reference-based Virtual Metrology method with uncertainty evaluation for Material Removal Rate prediction based on Gaussian Process Regression
    Cai, Haoshu
    Feng, Jianshe
    Yang, Qibo
    Li, Fei
    Li, Xiang
    Lee, Jay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 116 (3-4): : 1199 - 1211
  • [23] Modeling forecast errors for microgrid operation using Gaussian process regression
    Yeuntae Yoo
    Seungmin Jung
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [24] Gaussian Process Model-Based Performance Uncertainty Quantification of a Typical Turboshaft Engine
    Liu, Xuejun
    Tang, Hailong
    Zhang, Xin
    Chen, Min
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (18):
  • [25] Uncertainty quantification of structural dynamic characteristics based on sequential design and Gaussian process model
    Wan H.
    Zhang Z.
    Zhou J.
    Ren W.
    Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2024, 58 (03): : 529 - 536
  • [26] Modeling forecast errors for microgrid operation using Gaussian process regression
    Yoo, Yeuntae
    Jung, Seungmin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [27] Improved profile fitting and quantification of uncertainty in experimental measurements of impurity transport coefficients using Gaussian process regression
    Chilenski, M. A.
    Greenwald, M.
    Marzouk, Y.
    Howard, N. T.
    White, A. E.
    Rice, J. E.
    Walk, J. R.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2015, 55 (02)
  • [28] A hybrid data-driven-physics-constrained Gaussian process regression framework with deep kernel for uncertainty quantification
    Chang, Cheng
    Zeng, Tieyong
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2023, 486
  • [29] Uncertainty Quantification in Predicting UCS Using Fully Bayesian Gaussian Process Regression with Consideration of Model Class Selection
    Song, Chao
    Zhao, Tengyuan
    GEO-RISK 2023: INNOVATION IN DATA AND ANALYSIS METHODS, 2023, 345 : 9 - 19
  • [30] BIAS MINIMIZATION IN GAUSSIAN PROCESS SURROGATE MODELING FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
    Hombal, Vadiraj
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2011, 1 (04) : 321 - 349