Multi-technique estimation of ice mass balance in Greenland: impact of the uncertainties on firn densification and GIA models

被引:0
|
作者
Sanchez Lofficial, Ana [1 ]
Métivier, Laurent [1 ,2 ]
Fleitout, Luce [3 ]
Chanard, Kristel [1 ,2 ]
Greff-Lefftz, Marianne [1 ]
de La Serve, Maylis [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Gauer, Louis-Marie [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Gourrion, Emma [1 ]
机构
[1] Université Paris Cité, Institut de physique du globe de Paris, CNRS, Paris,F-75005, France
[2] Univ Gustave Eiffel, ENSG, IGN, Paris,F-75238, France
[3] École Normale Supérieure, CNRS UMR8538, PSL Research University, Paris,F-75005, France
[4] Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing,MI,48824, United States
[5] LEGOS, Université de Toulouse, CNES, CNRS, UPS, IRD, Toulouse,F-31400, France
[6] CNES, Centre Spatial de Toulouse, Toulouse,Cedex 9F-31401, France
关键词
Geodesy - Geodetic satellites - Glacial geology - Glaciers - Gravimeters - Hydrogeology - Miocene;
D O I
10.1093/gji/ggaf015
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We conduct a comprehensive comparison of ice mass balance (IMB) estimates for Greenland derived from satellite observations of ice surface elevation changes (SEC), gravity and global navigation satellite system (GNSS) observations. Our analysis integrates data from the ICESat and CryoSat-2 satellite altimetry missions, augmented by opticalstereo-imagery for peripheral glaciers, and GRACE satellite gravimetry mission, spanning the 2003–2008 and 2011–2015 periods. We also consider three firn densification models (FDM) and five glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) models for correcting the data sets for these effects when necessary. Our results reveal significant differences among FDM corrections applied to SEC observations, with particularly large variations in IMB estimates reaching up to 90 Gt yr−1. To address this, we develop an innovative method for estimating equivalent firn corrections to the ice elevation observations, based on a least-squares fit of filtered ice SEC observations to GRACE mass-change estimates. This approach is both simple and independent from climate models assumptions and shows minimal sensitivity to GIA model differences. Using this method, we estimate IMBs for Greenland at −217.6 ± 15.7 Gt yr−1 for 2003–2008 and −253.2 ± 18.8 Gt yr−1 for 2011–2015. Importantly, these values indicate an acceleration of the thinning rate, not consistently captured by the IMB estimates inferred from the ice SEC observations corrected by FDMs. Finally, we compute elastic ground deformation induced by ice mass change during 2011–2015, using the four proposed mass-variation distributions and compare the predicted vertical velocities with GNSS observations in Greenland, accounting for all GIA models. While all models are consistent with most of the GNSS-derived uplift rates, they cannot fully explain the observed vertical velocities, especially in the South-East Greenland, which confirms the need to refine our understanding of GIA contributions in this region. © The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1935 / 1952
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Uncertainties in projected surface mass balance over the polar ice sheets from dynamically downscaled EC-Earth models
    Boberg, Fredrik
    Mottram, Ruth
    Hansen, Nicolaj
    Yang, Shuting
    Langen, Peter L.
    CRYOSPHERE, 2022, 16 (01): : 17 - 33
  • [22] Impact of spatial resolution on the modelling of the Greenland ice sheet surface mass balance between 1990-2010, using the regional climate model MAR
    Franco, B.
    Fettweis, X.
    Lang, C.
    Erpicum, M.
    CRYOSPHERE, 2012, 6 (03): : 695 - 711
  • [23] Difference analysis of ice sheet mass balance retrieved from various Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment time-variable gravity field models: a case study in Antarctica and Greenland
    Xu, Ming
    Wan, Xiaoyun
    Zhang, Xiangyu
    Yu, Hangtao
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 17 (02)
  • [24] A Factor Two Difference in 21st-Century Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Balance Projections From Three Regional Climate Models Under a Strong Warming Scenario (SSP5-8.5)
    Glaude, Q.
    Noel, B.
    Olesen, M.
    Van den Broeke, M.
    van de Berg, W.J.
    Mottram, R.
    Hansen, N.
    Delhasse, A.
    Amory, C.
    Kittel, C.
    Goelzer, H.
    Fettweis, X.
    Geophysical Research Letters, 2024, 51 (22)