Flow-Based Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patency Metrics: Uncertainty Quantification Simulations to Guide Development

PurposeOver time, transit time flow measurement (TTFM) has proven itself as a simple and effective tool for intra-operative evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs). However, metrics used to screen for possible technical error show considerable spread, preventing the definition of sharp cut-off values to distinguish between patent, questionable, and failed grafts. The simulation study presented in this paper aims to quantify this uncertainty for commonly used patency metrics, and to identify the most important physiological parameters influencing it.MethodsUncertainty quantification was performed on a realistic multiscale numerical model of the coronary circulation, guided by Morris screening sensitivity analysis of a simpler, lumped-parameter model. Simulation results were qualitatively verified against results of a recent clinical study.ResultsCorrespondence with clinical study data is reasonable, especially considering that the model was not fitted in any way. Stenosis severity was confirmed to be an influential parameter. However, also cardiac period and graft diameter were observed to be important, particularly for mean flow rate and pulsatility index.ConclusionMetrics quantifying the flow waveform's diastolic dominance show the highest sensitivity to graft stenosis, and seem to be least affected by autoregulation. Among these, the novel diastolic resistance index shows the strongest sensitivity to stenosis severity.SignificanceThe approach used in this study is expected to benefit the development of improved patency metrics, by allowing medical engineers to include sensitivity and uncertainty in assessing, in-silico, the potential of novel metrics, thus enabling them to provide better guidance in the design of clinical studies.