Genicular Artery Embolization in Moderate to Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: Technique, Safety and Clinical Outcome

被引:0
|
作者
Amin, A. Taheri [1 ]
Frommhold, I. [1 ]
Huebner, A. [1 ]
Boschheidgen, M. [1 ]
Frenken, M. [1 ]
Jannusch, K. [1 ]
Tietz, E. [1 ]
Weiss, D. [1 ]
Wilms, L. M. [1 ]
Ziayee, F. [1 ]
Minko, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Genicular artery embolization; Technique; Safety; Clinical outcome; Radiation exposure; Vascular complications; PAIN; INTERVENTIONS; ANGIOGENESIS; CATHETERS; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1007/s00270-025-03983-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of genicular artery embolization for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Materials and Methods A total of 43 patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the knee (Kellgren and Lawrence grades 2-4) were included in this prospective study. Peri-interventional data including vascular access, embolized target vessels, fluoroscopy time and radiation dose were collected. After 2-, 3- and 12-month pain scores, functional outcomes and adverse events were assessed through a standardized questionnaire. Results All embolizations were performed via a coaxial system consisting of a 4F Cobra catheter and a Microcatheter without the use of an introducer sheath. A mixture of contrast agent (Accupaque, GE, USA) and microspheres (Embosphere, Merit Medical, USA) was injected. At least three genicular branches were embolized per patient with following incidence: inferior lateral genicular artery (77%), superior lateral genicular artery (74%) and descending genicular artery (74%). The mean total volume of permanent embolic agent used was 3.6 +/- 1.3 ml. The average fluoroscopy time was 29 +/- 11 min, and radiation dose was 40.84 +/- 26.21 Gy/cm(2). During the 1-year follow-up, patients pain while walking showed an average reduction of 2.0 +/- 0.5 points on the numeric rating scale (p < 0.0001), without any significant difference between different grades of osteoarthritis. Besides mild transient skin discolorations in four patients, no complications were observed. Conclusion Embolization of multiple genicular artery branches in a single session using microspheres in averaged doses higher than 2 ml total is safe and effective in reducing pain and improving functionality in patients with symptomatic OA, regardless of severity grade.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 350
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparing technical success and clinical outcomes of macrocatheter versus microcatheter in genicular artery embolization for knee osteoarthritis
    Guzelbey, Tevfik
    Dablan, Ali
    Arslan, Mustafa Fatih
    Altun, Omer
    Mutlu, Ilhan Nahit
    Kilickesmez, Ozgur
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 177
  • [22] Genicular Artery Embolization for Osteoarthritis Related Knee Pain: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes
    Leigh C. Casadaban
    Jacob C. Mandell
    Yan Epelboym
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2021, 44 : 1 - 9
  • [23] Genicular artery embolization for knee osteoarthritis: Results of the LipioJoint-1 trial
    Sapoval, Marc
    Querub, Charles
    Pereira, Helena
    Pellerin, Olivier
    Boeken, Tom
    Di Gaeta, Alessandro
    Al Ahmar, Marc
    Lefevre-Colau, Marie -Martine
    Nguyen, Christelle
    Daste, Camille
    Lacroix, Maxime
    Laredo, Jean -Denis
    Sabatier, Brigitte
    Martelli, Nicolas
    Chatellier, Gilles
    Dean, Carole
    Rannou, Francois
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2024, 105 (04) : 144 - 150
  • [24] Safety and Efficacy of Genicular Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Knee Pain Secondary to Osteoarthritis-Initial Indian Experience
    Gorsi, Ujjwal
    Singh, Damandeep
    Kang, Mandeep
    Kumar, Vishal
    Prakash, Mahesh
    Sreedhara, B. C.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2024, 34 (01): : 37 - 43
  • [25] Genicular Embolization versus Neurolysis Intervention (GENI) Study: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Genicular Artery Embolization with Genicular Neurolysis for Knee Osteoarthritis
    DesRoche, Chloe
    Nazzicone, Kristina
    DuMerton, Deborah
    Ghasemlou, Nader
    Mann, Steve
    Clinkard, David
    Menard, Alexandre
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (08) : 1224 - 1226
  • [26] Comparative Analysis of Transpedal and Transfemoral Access During Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Osteoarthritis
    Kilickesmez, Oezguer
    Dablan, Ali
    Guzelbey, Tevfik
    Cingoez, Mehmet
    Mutlu, Ilhan Nahit
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 47 (10) : 1335 - 1345
  • [27] Osteoarthritis-Related Knee Pain Treated With Genicular Artery Embolization: Letter to the Editor
    Torkian, Pooya
    Golzarian, Jafar
    Talaie, Reza
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (02)
  • [28] Common Design, Data Elements and Core Outcome Measures Reported on Clinical Trials of Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Interactive Systematic Review
    Bolsegui, Marisabel L.
    Ghozy, Sherief
    Kobeissi, Hassan
    Kadirvel, Ramanathan
    Kallmes, David F.
    Thompson, Scott M.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (03) : 977 - 993
  • [29] Genicular artEry embolizatioN in patiEnts with oSteoarthrItiS of the Knee (GENESIS) Using Permanent Microspheres: Interim Analysis
    Little, M. W.
    Gibson, M.
    Briggs, J.
    Speirs, A.
    Yoong, P.
    Ariyanayagam, T.
    Davies, N.
    Tayton, E.
    Tavares, S.
    MacGill, S.
    McLaren, C.
    Harrison, R.
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (06) : 931 - 940
  • [30] Reduction in Synovitis Following Genicular Artery Embolization in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Ultrasound and MRI Study
    Hindso, Louise
    Holmich, Per
    Petersen, Michael M.
    Xu, Jack J.
    Heerwagen, Soren
    Nielsen, Michael B.
    Riis, Robert G. C.
    Hansen, Adam E.
    Terslev, Lene
    Taudorf, Mikkel
    Lonn, Lars
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (22)