Bladder mucosal smoothness predicts early recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Le [1 ]
Yan, Ye [1 ]
Chu, Hongling [1 ]
Deng, Shaohui [1 ]
Ye, Jianfei [1 ]
Wang, Guoliang [1 ]
Huang, Yi [1 ]
Zhang, Fan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Shudong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Urol, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
来源
BMC UROLOGY | 2025年 / 25卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Prostate cancer; Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; Urinary incontinence; Prediction model; Postoperative complications; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; WALL THICKNESS; INCONTINENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-024-01682-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo propose the bladder mucosal smoothness (BMS) grade and validate a predictive model including MRI parameters preoperatively that can evaluate the early recovery of urinary continence (UC) after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 203 patients (83 patients experienced UI at the three-month follow-up) who underwent LRP in our medical center and were diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) from June 2016 to March 2020. Patients' clinicopathological data were collected. Prostate volume (PV), membranous urethra length (MUL), intravesical prostatic protrusion length (IPPL), and BMS grade were measured by MRI. The total sample was randomly divided into a training set (n = 142) and a validation set (n = 61). A model was developed to predict the risk of urinary incontinence (UI) at three months after LRP. ResultsAge group, clinical T stage group, BMS grade group, PV group, IPPL group, and MUL group differed significantly between patients in the UI group and the UC group (all P values < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified 3 MRI-related predictors selected for the prediction model: BMS grade (1 odds ratio [OR] 0.17, 95% CI 0.11-0.66; P value = 0.024) (2 + 3 OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.66; P value = 0.011), IPPL (> 5 mm OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.1-0.64; P = 0.004), and MUL (>= 14 mm OR 6.41, 95% CI 2.72-15.09; P value < 0.001). The model achieved a highest area under the curve of 0.900 in the training set and the validation set. The sensitivity and specificity of the prediction model were 0.800 and 0.816. ConclusionOur study confirmed that patients with lower BMS grade are associated with early recovery of urinary continence after LRP. A prediction model was developed and validated to evaluate the early recovery of urinary continence after LRP. Clinical trial numberNot applicable.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Editorial Comment to Intravesical prostatic protrusion as a predictor of early urinary continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Maeda, Yoshiko
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 (07) : 657 - 657
  • [23] Urinary bladder hypertrophy and overactive bladder determine urinary continence after radical prostatectomy
    Juszczak, Kajetan
    Ostrowski, Adam
    Adamowicz, Jan
    Maciukiewicz, Piotr
    Drewa, Tomasz
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 28 (10): : 1329 - 1337
  • [24] Investigation of the mechanism of urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy
    Kadono, Yoshifumi
    Kato, Yuki
    Nakagawa, Tomomi
    Makino, Tomoyuki
    Naito, Renato
    Urata, Satoko
    Nakashima, Kazufumi
    Iijima, Masashi
    Kawaguchi, Shohei
    Shigehara, Kazuyoshi
    Nohara, Takahiro
    Izumi, Kouji
    Mizokami, Atsushi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 : 279 - 279
  • [25] URINARY CONTINENCE AFTER RADICAL LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY VERSUS ROBOT ASSISTED: RECOVERY TIMES IN COMPARISON
    Pastorello, Mauro
    Caleffi, Giuseppe
    Molinari, Alberto
    Ballario, Riccardo
    Andretta, Elena
    Cavicchioli, Francesca Maria
    Cavalleri, Stefano
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2017, 36 : S70 - S70
  • [26] Time of catheterization as an independent predictor of early urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy
    Rossanese, Marta
    Crestani, Alessandro
    Palumbo, Vito
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Inferrera, Antonino
    Novara, Giacomo
    Valotto, Claudio
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2018, 70 (04) : 401 - 407
  • [27] Impact of total fascia preservation on early recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy
    Nishimura, Masanori
    Utsugi, Ryu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2018, 11 (04) : 293 - 298
  • [28] Re: Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion as a Predictor of Early Urinary Continence Recovery after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Editorial Comment
    Kaplan, Steven A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (01): : 137 - 138
  • [29] The Impact of Three Different Bladder Neck Reconstruction Techniques on Urinary Continence after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Zhang, Shaobo
    Liang, Chao
    Qian, Jian
    Liu, Yiyang
    Lv, Qiang
    Li, Jie
    Li, Pu
    Shao, Pengfei
    Wang, Zengjun
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2020, 34 (06) : 663 - 670
  • [30] Role of nerve sparing surgery and bladder neck preservation in urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Gözen, Ali Serdar
    Teber, Dogu
    Ates, Mutlu
    Hruza, Marcel
    Tefekli, Ahmet
    Erdogan, Sarper
    Rassweiler, Jens
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A54 - A54