Alternative splicing in ovarian cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Liwei Wei [1 ]
Yisheng Li [3 ]
Jiawang Chen [2 ]
Yuanmei Wang [3 ]
Jianmin Wu [4 ]
Huanming Yang [3 ]
Yi Zhang [5 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin University,Medical School, Faculty of Medicine
[2] Zhejiang University of Technology,College of Pharmacy
[3] Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM),HIM
[4] Chinese Academy of Sciences,BGI Omics Center
[5] Oujiang Laboratory,College of Life Sciences
[6] Zhejiang Lab for Regenerative Medicine,Institute of Genomic Medicine
[7] Vision and Brain Health,undefined
[8] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
[9] Wenzhou Medical University,undefined
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Alternative splicing; Tumorigenesis; Splicing variants; Splicing factors; Bioinformatics; Prognostic models;
D O I
10.1186/s12964-024-01880-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ovarian cancer is the second leading cause of gynecologic cancer death worldwide, with only 20% of cases detected early due to its elusive nature, limiting successful treatment. Most deaths occur from the disease progressing to advanced stages. Despite advances in chemo- and immunotherapy, the 5-year survival remains below 50% due to high recurrence and chemoresistance. Therefore, leveraging new research perspectives to understand molecular signatures and identify novel therapeutic targets is crucial for improving the clinical outcomes of ovarian cancer. Alternative splicing, a fundamental mechanism of post-transcriptional gene regulation, significantly contributes to heightened genomic complexity and protein diversity. Increased awareness has emerged about the multifaceted roles of alternative splicing in ovarian cancer, including cell proliferation, metastasis, apoptosis, immune evasion, and chemoresistance. We begin with an overview of altered splicing machinery, highlighting increased expression of spliceosome components and associated splicing factors like BUD31, SF3B4, and CTNNBL1, and their relationships to ovarian cancer. Next, we summarize the impact of specific variants of CD44, ECM1, and KAI1 on tumorigenesis and drug resistance through diverse mechanisms. Recent genomic and bioinformatics advances have enhanced our understanding. By incorporating data from The Cancer Genome Atlas RNA-seq, along with clinical information, a series of prognostic models have been developed, which provided deeper insights into how the splicing influences prognosis, overall survival, the immune microenvironment, and drug sensitivity and resistance in ovarian cancer patients. Notably, novel splicing events, such as PIGV|1299|AP and FLT3LG|50,941|AP, have been identified in multiple prognostic models and are associated with poorer and improved prognosis, respectively. These novel splicing variants warrant further functional characterization to unlock the underlying molecular mechanisms. Additionally, experimental evidence has underscored the potential therapeutic utility of targeting alternative splicing events, exemplified by the observation that knockdown of splicing factor BUD31 or antisense oligonucleotide-induced BCL2L12 exon skipping promotes apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells. In clinical settings, bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically targets the VEGF-A isoform, has demonstrated beneficial effects in the treatment of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. In conclusion, this review constitutes the first comprehensive and detailed exposition of the intricate interplay between alternative splicing and ovarian cancer, underscoring the significance of alternative splicing events as pivotal determinants in cancer biology and as promising avenues for future diagnostic and therapeutic intervention.
引用
下载
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Aberrant and alternative splicing in cancer
    Venables, JP
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 64 (21) : 7647 - 7654
  • [22] Hallmarks of alternative splicing in cancer
    S Oltean
    D O Bates
    Oncogene, 2014, 33 : 5311 - 5318
  • [23] Alternative splicing in cancer transcriptomes
    Shen, Shihao
    Wu, Ying Nian
    Xing, Yi
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 74 (19)
  • [24] Alternative splicing and breast cancer
    Dutertre, Martin
    Vagner, Stephan
    Auboeuf, Didier
    RNA BIOLOGY, 2010, 7 (04) : 403 - 411
  • [25] The alternative splicing side of cancer
    Biamonti, Giuseppe
    Catillo, Morena
    Pignataro, Daniela
    Montecucco, Alessandra
    Ghigna, Claudia
    SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 32 : 30 - 36
  • [26] Alternative splicing in prostate cancer
    Alec Paschalis
    Adam Sharp
    Jonathan C. Welti
    Antje Neeb
    Ganesh V. Raj
    Jun Luo
    Stephen R. Plymate
    Johann. S. de Bono
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2018, 15 : 663 - 675
  • [27] Alternative splicing in lung cancer
    Coomer, Alice O.
    Black, Fiona
    Greystoke, Alastair
    Munkley, Jennifer
    Elliott, David J.
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS, 2019, 1862 (11-12):
  • [28] Alternative splicing analysis identifies mutation hotspots in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes
    Farber-Katz, Suzette
    Hsuan, Vickie
    Hoo, Jayne
    Wu, Sitao
    Huy Vuong
    Xu, Dong
    Lu, Hsiao-Mei
    Gray, Phillip
    Elliott, Aaron
    Karam, Rachid
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [29] Alternative splicing enhanced with deep machine learning: a novel method to detect ovarian cancer
    Nobre, Silvana Pedra
    Cardillo, Nicholas
    Devor, Eric
    McDonald, Megan
    Goodheart, Michael
    Bender, David
    Bosquet, Jesus Gonzalez
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 : S86 - S87
  • [30] Alternative splicing acts as an independent prognosticator in ovarian carcinoma
    Yan Ouyang
    Kaide Xia
    Xue Yang
    Shichao Zhang
    Li Wang
    Shan Ren
    Houming Zhou
    Yi Liu
    Fuzhou Tang
    Scientific Reports, 11