Alternative splicing in ovarian cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Liwei Wei [1 ]
Yisheng Li [3 ]
Jiawang Chen [2 ]
Yuanmei Wang [3 ]
Jianmin Wu [4 ]
Huanming Yang [3 ]
Yi Zhang [5 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin University,Medical School, Faculty of Medicine
[2] Zhejiang University of Technology,College of Pharmacy
[3] Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM),HIM
[4] Chinese Academy of Sciences,BGI Omics Center
[5] Oujiang Laboratory,College of Life Sciences
[6] Zhejiang Lab for Regenerative Medicine,Institute of Genomic Medicine
[7] Vision and Brain Health,undefined
[8] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
[9] Wenzhou Medical University,undefined
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Alternative splicing; Tumorigenesis; Splicing variants; Splicing factors; Bioinformatics; Prognostic models;
D O I
10.1186/s12964-024-01880-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ovarian cancer is the second leading cause of gynecologic cancer death worldwide, with only 20% of cases detected early due to its elusive nature, limiting successful treatment. Most deaths occur from the disease progressing to advanced stages. Despite advances in chemo- and immunotherapy, the 5-year survival remains below 50% due to high recurrence and chemoresistance. Therefore, leveraging new research perspectives to understand molecular signatures and identify novel therapeutic targets is crucial for improving the clinical outcomes of ovarian cancer. Alternative splicing, a fundamental mechanism of post-transcriptional gene regulation, significantly contributes to heightened genomic complexity and protein diversity. Increased awareness has emerged about the multifaceted roles of alternative splicing in ovarian cancer, including cell proliferation, metastasis, apoptosis, immune evasion, and chemoresistance. We begin with an overview of altered splicing machinery, highlighting increased expression of spliceosome components and associated splicing factors like BUD31, SF3B4, and CTNNBL1, and their relationships to ovarian cancer. Next, we summarize the impact of specific variants of CD44, ECM1, and KAI1 on tumorigenesis and drug resistance through diverse mechanisms. Recent genomic and bioinformatics advances have enhanced our understanding. By incorporating data from The Cancer Genome Atlas RNA-seq, along with clinical information, a series of prognostic models have been developed, which provided deeper insights into how the splicing influences prognosis, overall survival, the immune microenvironment, and drug sensitivity and resistance in ovarian cancer patients. Notably, novel splicing events, such as PIGV|1299|AP and FLT3LG|50,941|AP, have been identified in multiple prognostic models and are associated with poorer and improved prognosis, respectively. These novel splicing variants warrant further functional characterization to unlock the underlying molecular mechanisms. Additionally, experimental evidence has underscored the potential therapeutic utility of targeting alternative splicing events, exemplified by the observation that knockdown of splicing factor BUD31 or antisense oligonucleotide-induced BCL2L12 exon skipping promotes apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells. In clinical settings, bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically targets the VEGF-A isoform, has demonstrated beneficial effects in the treatment of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. In conclusion, this review constitutes the first comprehensive and detailed exposition of the intricate interplay between alternative splicing and ovarian cancer, underscoring the significance of alternative splicing events as pivotal determinants in cancer biology and as promising avenues for future diagnostic and therapeutic intervention.
引用
下载
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multiple alternative splicing markers for ovarian cancer
    Klinck, Roscoe
    Bramard, Anne
    Inkel, Lyna
    Dufresne-Martin, Genevieve
    Gervais-Bird, Julien
    Madden, Richard
    Paquet, Eric R.
    Koh, ChuShin
    Venables, Julian P.
    Prinos, Panagiotis
    Jilaveanu-Pelmus, Manuela
    Wellinger, Raymund
    Rancourt, Claudine
    Chabot, Benoit
    Abou Elela, Sherif
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 68 (03) : 657 - 663
  • [2] Systematic Profiling of Alternative Splicing Events in Ovarian Cancer
    Liu, Jia
    Lv, Dekang
    Wang, Xiaobin
    Wang, Ruicong
    Li, Xiaodong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [3] RON alternative splicing regulation in primary ovarian cancer
    Mayer, Sebastian
    Hirschfeld, Marc
    Jaeger, Markus
    Pies, Susanne
    Iborra, Severine
    Erbes, Thalia
    Stickeler, Elmar
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 34 (01) : 423 - 430
  • [4] Alternative Splicing: A New Therapeutic Target for Ovarian Cancer
    Yao, Shijie
    Yuan, Cheng
    Shi, Yuying
    Qi, Yuwen
    Sridha, Radhakrishnan
    Dai, Mengyuan
    Cai, Hongbing
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2022, 21
  • [5] Systematic analysis of the relationship between ovarian cancer prognosis and alternative splicing
    Di Zhang
    Dan Zou
    Yue Deng
    Lihua Yang
    Journal of Ovarian Research, 14
  • [6] Chemoresistance-associated alternative splicing signatures in serous ovarian cancer
    Sun, Tianshui
    Yang, Qing
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2020, 20 (01) : 420 - 430
  • [7] Prediction of ovarian cancer with deep machine-learning and alternative splicing
    Watson, Rachel
    Ulmer, Keely
    Gabrilovich, Sofia
    Goodheart, Michael
    Bender, David
    McDonald, Megan
    Devor, Eric
    Bosquet, Jesus Gonzalez
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 176 : S236 - S236
  • [8] Systematic analysis of the relationship between ovarian cancer prognosis and alternative splicing
    Zhang, Di
    Zou, Dan
    Deng, Yue
    Yang, Lihua
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (01)
  • [9] Alternative Splicing and Cancer
    Auboeuf, Didier
    Carmo-Fonseca, Maria
    Valcarcel, Juan
    Biamonti, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEIC ACIDS, 2012, 2012
  • [10] Alternative transcription and alternative splicing in cancer
    Pal, Sharmistha
    Gupta, Ravi
    Davuluri, Ramana V.
    PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 136 (03) : 283 - 294