Addressing the second victim phenomenon among community pharmacists and its impact on clinical pharmacy practice: a consensus study

被引:0
|
作者
Zimonjic, Ivana [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Marinkovic, Valentina [1 ]
Mira, Jose Joaquin [3 ,4 ]
Djokic, Borivoje-Boris [5 ]
Odalovic, Marina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Pharm, Dept Social Pharm & Pharmaceut Legislat, Vojvode Stepe 450, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
[2] Galenika Ad Beograd, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Fdn Promot Hlth & Biomed Res Valencia Reg, Alicante, Spain
[4] Miguel Hernandez Univ, Hlth Psychol Dept, Elche, Spain
[5] Keiser Univ, Grad Business Sch, 1900 West Commercial Blvd, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33309 USA
关键词
Medication errors; Nominal group technique; Patient safety; Pharmacists; Second victims; PHARMACEUTICAL CARE; NOMINAL GROUP; SUPPORT; PERCEPTIONS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1007/s11096-024-01807-w
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe second victim phenomenon, denoting the harmful effects of patient safety incidents on healthcare practitioners, remains insufficiently examined within the pharmacy workforce.AimThis study aimed to investigate the second victim phenomenon in community pharmacies, focusing on its triggers, impacts on pharmacists' well-being, and effects on pharmaceutical care and safety.MethodThis consensus study with the Nominal Group Technique involved 27 community pharmacists in three equal groups. The final ranks of the statements scored by participants from 5 to 1 were recalculated using the Van Breda method, combining three distinct data sets with higher values for a higher impact on the output evaluated. Statistics were applied to ascertain event distribution and investigate the potential relationships between event categories and outcomes for patients and pharmacists.Results"Patient-centric anxiety" (6.8) was the top mental health issue, followed by "Personal responsibility and resilience" and "Future concerns and career aspirations" (6.0 each). The dominant support was "Colleague/Peer support" (5.3). The most frequent patient safety incidents were "Inadequate pharmaceutical service" (8.0) and "Wrong drug dispensed" (7.8). Most errors (63%) were dispensing failures, primarily wrong drug dispensed (44.4%). Of these, 50% were near misses, 25.0% caused no harm, and 16.7% had serious consequences. Field notes suggest contributing factors like inadequate supervision, crowding, and storage issues.ConclusionThis study revealed the second victim phenomenon among pharmacists, which potentially stems from breaches in practice standards. The impact on the quality and safety of pharmaceutical care and its influence on pharmacists' well-being should be studied in further studies.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 79
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Microcredentials training in pharmacy practice and education: an exploratory study of its viability and pharmacists’ professional needs
    Peggy Lok
    Kebede Beyene
    Ahmed Awaisu
    David Woods
    Nadir Kheir
    BMC Medical Education, 22
  • [32] Community Pharmacists' interest in and attitude to pharmacy practice research in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.
    Bhagavathula, Akshaya
    Gebreyohannes, Eyob
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2017, 37 (06): : E41 - E42
  • [33] Protocol for the development of a consensus practice guideline To address clinical and regulatory barriers to buprenorphine dispensing in community pharmacy
    Varisco, Tyler J.
    Fish, Hannah
    Bolin, Joshua
    Dadiomov, David
    Hill, Lucas G.
    Essien, Ekere J.
    Wanat, Matthew A.
    Ginsburg, Diane
    Waggener, Jeanne
    Yazdanfard, Sahar
    Song, Juhyeon
    Chi, Whanhui
    Thornton, Douglas
    ARCHIVES OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 82 (01)
  • [34] The standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study
    Katie Earle-Payne
    Paul Forsyth
    Chris F. Johnson
    Heather Harrison
    Susan Robertson
    Anita E. Weidmann
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2022, 44 : 663 - 672
  • [35] The standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study
    Earle-Payne, Katie
    Forsyth, Paul
    Johnson, Chris F.
    Harrison, Heather
    Robertson, Susan
    Weidmann, Anita E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2022, 44 (03) : 663 - 672
  • [36] Factors influencing clinical decision-making in pharmacy: a qualitative study among Dutch pharmacists
    Mertens, J.
    Koster, E.
    Deneer, V.
    Bouvy, M.
    van Gelder, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2022, 44 (06) : 1515 - 1516
  • [37] Exploring the gaps between education and pharmacy practice on antimicrobial stewardship: a qualitative study among pharmacists in Qatar
    Nasr, Ziad G.
    Higazy, Alya
    Wilbur, Kerry
    ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2019, 10 : 287 - 295
  • [38] Impact of a community of practice among cancer clinical nurse consultants
    Cook, Olivia
    Yeganeh, Ladan
    Davis, Heather
    Heywood, Ellen
    Mcleod, Vicki
    Sage, Claire
    Finn, Janelle
    Pearce, Jessie
    Rogers, Kim
    Thresher, Jenny
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 : 156 - 157
  • [39] Quality improvement in community pharmacy: a qualitative investigation of the impact of a postgraduate quality improvement educational module on pharmacists understanding and practice
    Latif, Asam
    Gulzar, Nargis
    Gohil, Sejal
    Ansong, Theo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2021, 29 (01) : 84 - 89
  • [40] A survey of Irish community pharmacists to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on pharmacist well-being and pharmacy practice
    Fleming, Aoife
    McCarthy, Suzanne
    Murphy, Caoimhe
    Kenny, Ciara
    Dalton, Kieran
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2021, 43 (06) : 1758 - 1758