Prediction of Physical Properties of Double Halides Using Machine Learning Methods

被引:0
|
作者
Kiselyova, N. N. [1 ]
Dudarev, V. A. [1 ,2 ]
Senko, O. V. [3 ]
Dokukin, A. A. [1 ,3 ]
Stolyarenko, A. V. [1 ]
Kuznetsova, Yu. O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, Baikov Inst Met & Mat Sci, Moscow 119334, Russia
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
[3] Russian Acad Sci, Fed Res Ctr Comp Sci & Control, Moscow 119333, Russia
关键词
machine learning; halide; melting point; lattice parameters;
D O I
10.1134/S1054661824700718
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of various machine learning methods in predicting the quantitative properties of inorganic compounds was compared. To assess the accuracy, cross-validation was used in the mode leave-one-out cross-validation. It has been shown that the use of ridge, Bayesian ridge, automatic relevance determination regression, elastic net, and extra trees regressor programs and gradient boosting regressor and hist gradient boosting regressor, based on the methodology of ensembles of machine learning algorithms from the scikit-learn package, as well as simple syndrome regressor and recursive regressor, specially designed to solve problems in the field of inorganic materials science, allows us to obtain the most accurate estimates. Using selected machine learning programs, the melting point at atmospheric pressure of double halides of compositions ABHal3, ABHal4, A2BHal4, A2BHal5, and A3BHal6 (A and B are different elements; Hal is F, Cl, Br, or I) was predicted and the parameters of their crystal lattice under normal conditions were estimated. When estimating melting points, the average absolute errors determined by the cross-validation method were in the range of 29-52 K, depending on the composition of halides and the selected algorithm. Multiple determination coefficient R2 for models used for forecasting was not lower than 0.7. When estimating lattice parameters, the average absolute errors for linear parameters were in the range of 0.0068-0.2120 & Aring; and were 0.1209 degrees-0.1562 degrees for angles. R2 was above 0.6.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 830
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction of Cesarean Childbirth using Ensemble Machine Learning Methods
    Khan, Nafiz Imtiaz
    Mahmud, Tahasin
    Islam, Muhammad Nazrul
    Mustafina, Sumaiya Nuha
    22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION INTEGRATION AND WEB-BASED APPLICATIONS & SERVICES (IIWAS2020), 2020, : 331 - 339
  • [32] Prediction of hydrogel swelling states using machine learning methods
    Wang, Yawen
    Wallmersperger, Thomas
    Ehrenhofer, Adrian
    ENGINEERING REPORTS, 2024, 6 (11)
  • [33] Agricultural loan delinquency prediction using machine learning methods
    Chen, Jian
    Katchova, Ani L.
    Zhou, Chenxi
    INTERNATIONAL FOOD AND AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2021, 24 (05): : 797 - 812
  • [34] Jamming Prediction for Radar Signals Using Machine Learning Methods
    Lee, Gyeong-Hoon
    Jo, Jeil
    Park, Cheong Hee
    SECURITY AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, 2020, 2020
  • [35] Snow avalanche hazard prediction using machine learning methods
    Choubin, Bahram
    Borji, Moslem
    Mosavi, Amir
    Sajedi-Hosseini, Farzaneh
    Singh, Vijay P.
    Shamshirband, Shahaboddin
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 577
  • [36] Prediction of Phage Virion Proteins Using Machine Learning Methods
    Barman, Ranjan Kumar
    Chakrabarti, Alok Kumar
    Dutta, Shanta
    MOLECULES, 2023, 28 (05):
  • [37] Demand Prediction using Machine Learning Methods and Stacked Generalization
    Tugay, Resul
    Oguducu, Sule Gunduz
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS (DATA), 2017, : 216 - 222
  • [38] BOD5 Prediction Using machine learning methods
    Ooi, Kai Sheng
    Chen, Zhiyuan
    Poh, Phaik Eong
    Cui, Jian
    WATER SUPPLY, 2022, 22 (01) : 1168 - 1182
  • [39] Estimate Petrophysical Properties by Using Machine Learning Methods
    Tran Nguyen Thien Tam
    Dinh Hoang Truong Thanh
    ADVANCES IN RESEARCH ON WATER RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2023, : 475 - 486
  • [40] Benchmarking machine learning methods for modeling physical properties of ionic liquids
    Baskin, Igor
    Epshtein, Alon
    Ein-Eli, Yair
    Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2022, 351