Chromosome segmentation and classification: an updated review

被引:0
|
作者
Devaraj Somasundaram [1 ]
Nirmala Madian [2 ]
Kam Meng Goh [3 ]
S. Suresh [4 ]
机构
[1] Vellore Institute of Technology,Department of Micro and Nanoelectronics, School of Electronics Engineering (SENSE)
[2] Department of Biomedical Engineering,Centre for Multimodal Signal Processing, Faculty of Engineering and Technology
[3] Dr. N.G.P. Institute of Technology,undefined
[4] Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology,undefined
[5] Mediscan Systems,undefined
关键词
Chromosome; Classification; Karyotyping; Metaphase spread; Segmentation;
D O I
10.1007/s10115-024-02243-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Karyotyping is a study of chromosomes to identify various chromosomal aberrations related to structure and number. Chromosome image analysis involves challenging issues related to overlapping and touching of chromosomes. Chromosome segmentation and classification generally focus on separating overlapping and touching chromosomes. The analysis methods start from conventional image processing methods to advanced machine learning techniques. These methods are broadly classified into low-level and high-level methods. The low-level methods are thresholding-based approaches, edge detection, feature extraction techniques like active contours and watershed approaches and machine learning for classification. The high-level methods are deep learning algorithms like convolutional neural networks (CNNs), U-Net, autoencoder architectures. These methods help in improving accuracy and automate the process of chromosome segmentation and classification. High-level approaches can handle complexity in chromosome overlaps which provides better segmentation results. The approach learns complicated patterns and structures of chromosome images, which helps in achieving better classification accuracy. The challenges are: (i) working on large and annotated dataset for training deep learning models and (ii) suffer issues with new dataset even in they perform better during training phase. The solution for all these can be a hybrid approach that combines conventional method with modern approaches. This survey gives readers a basic understanding of automated karyotyping and future direction in this domain.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 1011
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An updated review of the TNM classification system for cancer of the esophagus and its complications
    Lopez Sala, P.
    Alberdi Aldasoro, N.
    Fuertes Fernandez, I.
    Saenz Banuelos, J.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2021, 63 (05): : 445 - 455
  • [32] A review and updated classification of pollen gathering behavior in bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea)
    Portman, Zachary M.
    Orr, Michael C.
    Griswold, Terry
    JOURNAL OF HYMENOPTERA RESEARCH, 2019, 71 : 171 - 208
  • [33] The Salvage of a Tissue Expander—an Updated Literature Review, a Classification and Illustrative Cases
    Martha F. I. De La Cruz Monroy
    Reza Arya
    Khawaja Gulraiz Rauf
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2022, 84 : 262 - 270
  • [34] UPDATED KIEL CLASSIFICATION
    RICHARDS, MA
    STANSFELD, AG
    LANCET, 1988, 1 (8591): : 937 - 937
  • [35] AN UPDATED ANGIOSPERM CLASSIFICATION
    DAHLGREN, G
    BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1989, 100 (03) : 197 - 203
  • [36] An updated classification of Orchidaceae
    Chase, Mark W.
    Cameron, Kenneth M.
    Freudenstein, John V.
    Pridgeon, Alec M.
    Salazar, Gerado
    Van den Berg, Cassio
    Schuiteman, Andre
    BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2015, 177 (02) : 151 - 174
  • [37] Updated classification of malformations
    Acien, P.
    Acien, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 : I81 - I82
  • [38] The updated ASA classification
    Boehmer, A.
    Defosse, J.
    Geldner, G.
    Rossaint, R.
    Zacharowski, K.
    Zwissler, B.
    Wappler, F.
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE & INTENSIVMEDIZIN, 2021, 62 : 223 - 228
  • [39] UPDATED KIEL CLASSIFICATION
    MEAD, G
    SWEETENHAM, J
    LANCET, 1988, 1 (8586): : 649 - 650
  • [40] An updated classification for Apocynaceae
    Endress, Mary E.
    Liede-Schumann, Sigrid
    Meve, Ulrich
    PHYTOTAXA, 2014, 159 (03) : 175 - 194