Long-term outcomes of skin-sparing mastectomy and nipple-sparing mastectomy versus traditional mastectomy in breast cancer: a case-control study based on preoperative ultrasound and clinical indicators

被引:0
|
作者
Si, Mengqing [1 ,2 ]
Jiao, Yile [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Li [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Rongruo [1 ,2 ]
Zhong, Xiaorong [3 ,4 ]
Lv, Qing [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, West China Sch Med, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Div Breast Surg, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Breast Ctr, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM); Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM); Breast-conserving surgery (BCS); Oncologic outcomes; 10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; ONCOLOGICAL SAFETY; AREOLA COMPLEX; RECONSTRUCTION; CONSERVATION; RECURRENCE; SURGERY; DISEASE; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-025-03695-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and objective Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) are recognized for their aesthetic benefits in breast cancer patients. However, detailed evaluations with large samples of their long-term oncological effectiveness are limited. This study aims to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of NSM/SSM and traditional mastectomy (TM) in patients with stage I-III breast cancer and to identify influential preoperative factors. Methods Among the 12,802 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery from 2009 to 2022 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 295 NSM/SSM patients and 584 TM patients were selected after propensity score matching adjusted for variables. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, Fisher's exact test, and log-rank tests, with Cox regression identifying survival predictors. Results The median follow-up period was 97.93 months. Local recurrence (LR) was 5.76 +/- 1.36% for NSM/SSM compared to 3.25 +/- 0.73% for TM (p = 0.076). Overall survival (OS) was comparable (p = 0.601), while disease-free survival (DFS) showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.066). However, there was a significant difference in distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (p = 0.029). The 5-year OS rates between the matched groups were similar (98.11% vs. 98.09%, p = 1.000), while the TM group exhibited higher 5-year DFS(95.14% vs. 92.03%, p = 0.335). Following the univariate analysis, multivariate analysis identified significant DFS predictors: stage (HR = 2.701, p = 0.031), radiotherapy (HR = 1.928, p = 0.018), and targeted therapy (HR = 5.584, p < 0.001). For OS, significant predictors included stage (HR = 8.309, p = 0.021) and PR status (HR = 0.35, p = 0.010). Conclusions NSM/SSM demonstrated comparable OS and DFS to TM, though with lower DMFS. Preoperative ultrasound parameters showed no significant impact on long-term outcomes, confirming the oncologic safety of NSM/SSM. Tailored adjuvant therapies and appropriate follow-up may further optimize patient prognoses.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prognosis Comparison Between Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Total Mastectomy in Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study After Propensity Score Matching
    Fu, Mengdie
    Chen, Qitong
    Zeng, Liyun
    Hong, Tao
    Zou, Qiongyan
    Yuan, Yunchang
    Yi, Wenjun
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (04) : 2221 - 2230
  • [32] Clinical factors influencing residual subcutaneous tissue after skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction
    Turna, Menekse
    Caglar, Hale Basak
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2025, 15
  • [33] Preservation of the nipple–areola complex in skin-sparing mastectomy for early breast cancer
    Ryo Miyake
    Satoki Kinoshita
    Naoko Shimada
    Ken Uchida
    Hiroshi Takeyama
    Toshiaki Morikawa
    Surgery Today, 2018, 48 : 591 - 597
  • [34] Long Term Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction Based on Tumor-Nipple Distance
    Ryu, J.
    Lee, J.
    Alsharif, E.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : S93 - S94
  • [35] Comparison of locoregional recurrence risk among nipple-sparing mastectomy, skin-sparing mastectomy, and simple mastectomy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a single-center study
    Nashimoto, Mika
    Asano, Yuko
    Matsui, Hiroki
    Machida, Youichi
    Hoshi, Kazuei
    Kurosumi, Masafumi
    Fukuma, Eisuke
    BREAST CANCER, 2024, 31 (06) : 1010 - 1017
  • [36] Indication for Skin-Sparing Mastectomy With or Without Nipple Preservation for Primary Breast Cancer
    Kontani, Keiichi
    Murazawa, Chisa
    Norimura, Shoko
    Yamashita, Kanako
    Fujiwara-Honjo, Naomi
    Ohtani, Masahiro
    Date, Manabu
    Kushida, Yoshio
    Muneuchi, Gan
    Haba, Reiji
    Yokomise, Hiroyasu
    Yamauchi, Akira
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2010, 95 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [37] Feasibility study of nipple-sparing mastectomy for Japanese breast cancer patients
    Takahashi, Maiko
    Jinno, Hiromitsu
    Hayashida, Tetsu
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (27)
  • [38] Long-Term Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction
    Yamashita, Yuji
    Tsunoda, Hiroko
    Nagura, Naomi
    Kajiura, Yuka
    Yoshida, Atsushi
    Takei, Junko
    Suzuki, Koyu
    Watanabe, Tadashi
    Iwahira, Yoshiko
    Yamauchi, Hideko
    Hayashi, Naoki
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2021, 21 (04) : 352 - 359
  • [39] Long-term oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction
    Yamashita, Y.
    Hayashi, N.
    Nagura, N.
    Kajiura, Y.
    Yoshida, A.
    Takei, J.
    Suzuki, K.
    Tsunoda, H.
    Yamauchi, H.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (04)
  • [40] Reverse Expansion for Breast Reconstruction after Skin-sparing and Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: Our First 100 Cases
    Fabiocchi, Luca
    Lucattelli, Elena
    Cattin, Federico
    Cipriani, Federico
    Dellachiesa, Laura
    Fogacci, Tommaso
    Frisoni, Gianluca
    Semprini, Gloria
    Samorani, Domenico
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (04) : E4915