Prenatal diagnosis following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions: a single centre record linkage study

被引:0
|
作者
Poulton, Alice [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Menezes, Melody [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Hardy, Tristan [1 ,2 ]
Lewis, Sharon [2 ,3 ]
Hui, Lisa [2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Monash IVF Grp Ltd, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Victorian Clin Genet Serv, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[5] Mercy Hosp Women, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[6] Northern Hosp, Epping, Vic, Australia
关键词
Preimplantation genetic testing; Prenatal diagnosis; PGT-M; Karyomapping; Single gene disorder; 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening; HEREDITARY BREAST; OVARIAN-CANCER; GUIDELINES; CARRIERS;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-024-03346-9
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
PurposeProfessional bodies currently advise all pregnant individuals undertake confirmatory prenatal diagnostic testing following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions (PGT-M). We aimed to ascertain the uptake of prenatal diagnostic testing following PGT-M in a large single-centre population.MethodsThis observational linkage study was undertaken using routinely collected outcome data from PGT-M cycles performed at one of Australia's largest PGT-M providers and a statewide dataset of all prenatal samples undergoing cytogenetic analysis in Victoria, Australia, between 2015 and 2022.ResultsDuring the study period, there were 176 clinical pregnancies following the transfer of a PGT-M-tested embryo in 132 patients. Eleven patients undertook confirmatory prenatal diagnostic testing in 12 pregnancies, representing a confirmatory testing rate of 8.3% [95% CI: 4.7-14.3%] per patient and 6.8% [95% CI: 3.9-11.5%] per pregnancy. The 176 clinical pregnancies resulted in 154 (87.5%) live births and pregnancies ongoing at the time of reporting, 21 (11.9%) pregnancy losses <= 20 weeks gestation, and 1 (0.6%) stillbirth.ConclusionsMost patients who conceive following the transfer of a PGT-M-tested embryo do not undertake confirmatory prenatal diagnostic testing. The low uptake of confirmatory testing raises important considerations for genetic counselling for PGT-M and the acceptability of current clinical practice recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 284
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PREIMPLANTATION AND PRENATAL GENETIC TESTING UPTAKE INMOTHERS FOLLOWING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY.
    Markwei, Metabel Tori
    Farrell, Ruth
    Yao, Meng
    Desai, Nina
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (03) : E22 - E22
  • [32] Preimplantation genetic testing and prenatal diagnosis in a family with pseudovaginal perineoscrotal hypospadias: A case report
    Chen, Jiayao
    Zhang, Zhiping
    Shi, Wenjing
    Yan, Qin
    Bi, Xingyu
    Zhu, Pengfei
    Zhang, Dongdong
    Wu, Xueqing
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (46) : E36171
  • [33] The preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders strategy for blocking the transmission of hereditary cancers through haplotype linkage analysis by karyomapping
    Chen, Chuanju
    Shi, Hao
    Niu, Wenbin
    Bao, Xiao
    Yang, Jingya
    Jin, Haixia
    Song, Wenyan
    Sun, Yingpu
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2023, 40 (12) : 2933 - 2943
  • [34] The preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders strategy for blocking the transmission of hereditary cancers through haplotype linkage analysis by karyomapping
    Chuanju Chen
    Hao Shi
    Wenbin Niu
    Xiao Bao
    Jingya Yang
    Haixia Jin
    Wenyan Song
    Yingpu Sun
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2023, 40 : 2933 - 2943
  • [35] Cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing (cbNIPT): an alternative to chorionic villus sampling to confirm diagnosis of unaffected fetuses following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M)
    Toft, C. L. F.
    Ingerslev, H. J.
    Kesmodel, U. S.
    Hatt, L.
    Singh, R.
    Ravn, K.
    Hestbek, B.
    Christensen, I. B.
    Koelvraa, M.
    Jeppesen, L. D.
    Schelde, P.
    Vogel, I.
    Uldbjerg, N.
    Farlie, R.
    Sommer, S.
    Ostergaard, M. L. V.
    Jensen, A. N.
    Mogensen, H.
    Degn, B.
    Okkels, H.
    Ernst, A.
    Pedersen, I. S.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 79 - 79
  • [36] Pregnancy Outcome following Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Anomaly: A Record Linkage Study of 26,261 Pregnancies
    Jacobs, Myrthe
    Cooper, Sally-Ann
    McGowan, Ruth
    Nelson, Scott M.
    Pell, Jill P.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [37] Prenatal and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for single gene disorders: A population-based study from 1977 to 2016
    Poulton, Alice
    Lewis, Sharon
    Hui, Lisa
    Halliday, Jane L.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2018, 38 (12) : 904 - 910
  • [38] ATTITUDES, PERSPECTIVES, AND FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PRENATAL TESTING AND PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS IN FAMILIES AFFECTED BY HEMOPHILIA
    Ramos, Melissa A.
    O'Neill, Suzanne
    Clemenz, Kristin
    Besser, Andria
    Robinson, Bob
    Sharathkumar, Anjali
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2014, 89 (06) : E45 - E45
  • [39] LIKELIHOOD FOR REACHING EMBRYO TRANSFER FOLLOWING EXCLUSION-BASED NON-DISCLOSURE PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING FOR MONOGENIC CONDITIONS (PGT-M).
    Merrion, Katrina
    Wemmer, Nina
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (03) : E236 - E237
  • [40] Day 5 versus day 3 embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defects
    Vlajkovic, Tijana
    Grigore, Mihaela
    van Eekelen, Rik
    Puscasiu, Lucian
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (11):