Modeling optimal combination of breast and cervical cancer screening strategies in China

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Xuewei [1 ]
Wang, Yanbo [1 ]
Gao, Bei [1 ]
Lu, Xinlin [1 ]
Wang, Yuan [1 ]
Lu, Wenli [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Stat, 22 Qixiangtai Rd, Tianjin 300070, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Breast cancer; Cervical cancer; Screening strategies; Cost-effective; Markov model; Integer programming model; COST-EFFECTIVENESS;
D O I
10.1186/s12905-025-03573-x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundBreast and cervical cancers are the commonest cancers among women. Secondary prevention of cancer through screening minimizes disease burden and improves survival outcomes. Optimizing screening strategies for breast and cervical cancers is a challenge in resource-limited settings with a high population density such as China. Therefore, we aimed at assessing the efficiency of different combined screening strategies for breast and cervical cancers under different budgets in China.MethodsMarkov cohort model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 36 strategy combinations for breast and cervical cancer screening with varying screening modality and intervals. The results were used as inputs in the Integer Programming (IP) model to determine the combination of the different screening options under different budgets.ResultsThe optimal combination strategy was biennial breast ultrasonography (BUS) and mammography (MAM) in parallel screening and quinquennial human papillomavirus (HPV) for breast and cervical cancer screening under the threshold of the annual per capita social cost investment (PCSCI) (18.80 USD) in China. Using this strategy, the total investment cost for 100,000 females was 1,877,984.50 USD, and the incremental life-years compared with no screening was 3,122 life-years. The optimal combination strategy included annual clinical breast examination (CBE), BUS and MAM in series screening, and biennial thin-layer liquid-based cytology (TCT) and HPV in series screening with the annual PCSCI reaching 37.60 USD. Thereafter, as the cost input continued to increase, the optimal combination strategy remained unchanged, and the sum of incremental life-years and actual input costs did not increase.ConclusionsFrom a social cost-benefit perspective, biennial BUS and MAM in parallel screening, and quinquennial HPV screening is the most efficient combination strategy with limited budget, while annual CBE, BUS and MAM in series screening and biennial TCT and HPV in series screening are the most efficient combination strategy with sufficient budget.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Strategies to eliminate cervical cancer in China
    Ji, Lu
    Chen, Manli
    Yao, Lan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [22] Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Shailavi Jain
    Jetrina Maque
    Artin Galoosian
    Antonia Osuna-Garcia
    Folasade P. May
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2022, 23 : 474 - 493
  • [23] Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Jain, Shailavi
    Maque, Jetrina
    Galoosian, Artin
    Osuna-Garcia, Antonia
    May, Folasade P.
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 23 (04) : 474 - 493
  • [24] Computational modeling of ovarian cancer dynamics suggests optimal strategies for therapy and screening
    Gu, Shengqing
    Lheureux, Stephanie
    Sayad, Azin
    Cybulska, Paulina
    Hogen, Liat
    Vyarvelska, Iryna
    Tu, Dongsheng
    Parulekar, Wendy R.
    Nankivell, Matthew
    Kehoe, Sean
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Levine, Douglas A.
    Bernardini, Marcus Q.
    Rosen, Barry
    Oza, Amit
    Brown, Myles
    Neel, Benjamin G.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (25)
  • [25] Combination Immunotherapy Strategies in Breast Cancer
    Chun, Brie M.
    Page, David B.
    McArthur, Heather L.
    CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2019, 11 (04) : 228 - 240
  • [26] Combination Immunotherapy Strategies in Breast Cancer
    Brie M. Chun
    David B. Page
    Heather L. McArthur
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2019, 11 : 228 - 240
  • [27] Implementation of systems strategies for breast and cervical cancer screening services in health maintenance organizations
    Goins, KV
    Zapka, JG
    Geiger, AM
    Solberg, LI
    Taplin, S
    Yood, MU
    Gilbert, J
    Mouchawar, J
    Somkin, CP
    Weinmann, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2003, 9 (11): : 745 - +
  • [28] Performance of cervical cancer screening and triage strategies among women living with HIV in China
    Duan, Rufei
    Zhao, Xuelian
    Zhang, Hongyun
    Xu, Xiaoqian
    Huang, Liuye
    Wu, Aihui
    Li, Le
    Qiao, Youlin
    Zhao, Fanghui
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (17): : 6078 - 6088
  • [29] Optimal cervical cytology mass screening interval for cervical cancer
    Kobayashi, Daiki
    Takahashi, Osamu
    Hikosaka, Chikako
    Okubo, Tomoya
    Fukui, Tsuguya
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2013, 287 (03) : 549 - 554
  • [30] Optimal cervical cytology mass screening interval for cervical cancer
    Daiki Kobayashi
    Osamu Takahashi
    Chikako Hikosaka
    Tomoya Okubo
    Tsuguya Fukui
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2013, 287 : 549 - 554