The effect of combined pudendal nerve and spermatic cord block or caudal epidural block on postoperative analgesia after posterior urethroplasty: a randomized trial

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Ying [1 ]
Gong, Wen-Yi [2 ]
Zhang, Jing-Yu [3 ]
Li, Chen-Guang [4 ]
Xu, Bing [2 ]
Zhang, Da-Qian [5 ]
Fan, Kun [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 6, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, 600 Yishan Rd, Shanghai 200233, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Xuhui Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Anesthesiol, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
[4] Tianshui First Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Tianshui, Gansu, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 6, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 600 Yishan Rd, Shanghai 200233, Peoples R China
来源
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Pudendal nerve; Spermatic cord; Anesthesia; Caudal; Nerve block; Ultrasonography; LOCAL-ANESTHETICS; COMPLICATIONS; BUPIVACAINE; PAIN; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; HYPOSPADIAS; ADJUVANTS; DURATION; EFFICACY; ANATOMY;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-024-02744-x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundPostoperative pain management remains a significant challenge for patients undergoing posterior urethroplasty (PU). In a previous study, we proposed a novel technique of combined pudendal nerve (PN) and spermatic cord (SC) block to manage pain after PU. The present trial was conducted to test the hypothesis that this technique is effective for pain control after PU and provides longer-lasting analgesia than caudal epidural block (CB).MethodsSixty patients undergoing PU were randomized into two groups: Group NB received combined PN and SC block, and Group CB received CB. General anesthesia with a laryngeal mask was performed. The primary outcome was the postoperative analgesic duration, and the secondary outcomes included the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores for pain and the number of patients with different motor scores of the lower limb at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively.ResultsTwo patients in Group CB were withdrawn due to block failure. The postoperative analgesic duration was statistically longer in Group NB compared with Group CB (mean difference [95% confidence interval], 115.78 min [17.80, 213.75]; P = 0.021). The NRS scores for pain at 12 and 24 h after surgery were statistically lower in Group NB compared with Group CB. Group NB had statistically more patients with motor score 0 at 3 h postoperatively than Group CB.ConclusionsPN combined with SC block is an effective technique for postoperative analgesia in PU. This technique can achieve a longer duration of analgesia and lower pain scores, especially 12 h after surgery, than a CB.Trial registrationThis study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (registration no. ChiCTR2100042971, registration date on 2/2/2021).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nerve stimulator-guided pudendal nerve block vs general anesthesia for postoperative pain management after anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair: a prospective randomized trial
    Khalil, Iman
    Itani, Saad E.
    Naja, Zeina
    Naja, Ahmad Salah
    Ziade, Fouad M.
    Ayoubi, Jean-Marc
    El-Rajab, Mariam A.
    Naja, Zoher M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2016, 34 : 668 - 675
  • [22] Comparison between erector spinal plane block and epidural block techniques for postoperative analgesia in open cholecystectomies: a randomized clinical trial
    Sakae, Thiago Mamoru
    Yamauchi, Luiz Henrique Ide
    Takaschima, Augusto Key Karazawa
    Brandao, Julio C.
    Benedetti, Roberto Henrique
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2020, 70 (01): : 22 - 27
  • [23] Intraarticular Analgesia Versus Epidural Plus Femoral Nerve Block After TKA: A Randomized, Double-blind Trial
    Reinhardt, Keith R.
    Duggal, Shivi
    Umunna, Ben-Paul
    Reinhardt, Gregory A.
    Nam, Denis
    Alexiades, Michael
    Cornell, Charles N.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (05) : 1400 - 1408
  • [24] Combined scaitic and saphenous nerve block for postoperative analgesia after hallux valgus surgery
    De Mey, JC
    Van Wesemael, G
    Brusselmans, G
    Devulder, J
    Rolly, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 : 110 - 110
  • [25] Posterior Intercostal Nerve Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine: An Alternative to Thoracic Epidural Analgesia
    Rice, David C.
    Cata, Juan P.
    Mena, Gabriel E.
    Rodriguez-Restrepo, Andrea
    Correa, Arlene M.
    Mehran, Reza J.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 99 (06): : 1953 - 1960
  • [26] Pudendal Versus Caudal Block in Children Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kendigelen, Pinar
    Tutuncu, Ayse Cigdem
    Emre, Senol
    Altindas, Fatis
    Kaya, Guner
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 41 (05) : 610 - 615
  • [27] Effect of ilioinguinal nerve block on the catecholamine plasma levels in orchidopexy: comparison with caudal epidural block
    Somri, M
    Gaitini, LA
    Vaida, SJ
    Yanovski, B
    Sabo, E
    Levy, N
    Greenberg, A
    Liscinsky, S
    Zinder, O
    PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 12 (09): : 791 - 797
  • [28] Effect of scalp nerve block on postcraniotomy analgesia in children: a randomized, controlled trial
    Xiong, Wei
    Wang, Yaxin
    Li, Lu
    Li, Ling
    Feng, Yifan
    Liu, Yan
    Liu, Bin
    Jin, Xu
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [29] Comparison of the postoperative analgesic effects of US-guided caudal block and US-guided pudendal nerve block in circumcision
    Ozen, Volkan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021,
  • [30] Nerve stimulation guided bilateral pudendal nerve block versus landmark-based caudal block for hypospadias repair in young children: a prospective, randomized, pragmatic trial
    Choudhry, Dinesh K.
    Heredia, Larry
    Brenn, Bruce Randall
    Brown, Melinda
    Carvalho, Norman F.
    Whaley, Milicent C.
    Shaik, Sadiq S.
    Hagerty, Jennifer A.
    Hani, Ahmad Bani
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 47 (12) : 744 - 748