The use of artificial intelligence based chat bots in ophthalmology triage

被引:0
|
作者
David, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Zloto, Ofira [1 ,2 ]
Katz, Gabriel [1 ,2 ]
Huna-Baron, Ruth [1 ,2 ]
Vishnevskia-Dai, Vicktoria [1 ,2 ]
Armarnik, Sharon [1 ,2 ]
Zauberman, Noa Avni [1 ,2 ]
Barnir, Elinor Megiddo [1 ,2 ]
Singer, Reut [1 ,2 ]
Hostovsky, Avner [1 ,2 ]
Klang, Eyal [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Sheba Med Ctr, Goldschleger Eye Inst, Tel Hashomer, Israel
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Div Data Driven & Digital Med D3M, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41433-024-03488-1
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate AI-based chat bots ability to accurately answer common patient's questions in the field of ophthalmology. Methods: An experienced ophthalmologist curated a set of 20 representative questions and responses were sought from two AI generative models: OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Bard (Gemini Pro). Eight expert ophthalmologists from different sub-specialties assessed each response, blinded to the source, and ranked them by three metrics-accuracy, comprehensiveness, and clarity, on a 1-5 scale. Results: For accuracy, ChatGPT scored a median of 4.0, whereas Bard scored a median of 3.0. In terms of comprehensiveness, ChatGPT achieved a median score of 4.5, compared to Bard which scored a median of 3.0. Regarding clarity, ChatGPT maintained a higher score with a median of 5.0, compared to Bard's median score of 4.0. All comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: AI-based chat bots can provide relatively accurate and clear responses for addressing common ophthalmological inquiries. ChatGPT surpassed Bard in all measured metrics. While these AI models exhibit promise, further research is indicated to improve their performance and allow them to be used as a reliable medical tool.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 789
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: Evolutions in Asia
    Ruamviboonsuk, Paisan
    Cheung, Carol Y.
    Zhang, Xiulan
    Raman, Rajiv
    Park, Sang Jun
    Ting, Daniel Shu Wei
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 9 (02): : 78 - 84
  • [42] Crowdsourcing for Artificial Intelligence Models in Ophthalmology
    Hallaj, Shahin
    Radgoudarzi, Niloofar
    Baxter, Sally L.
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 142 (11) : 1016 - 1017
  • [43] Generative artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: Correspondence
    Daungsupawong, Hinpetch
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 69 (05) : 848 - 848
  • [44] Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots
    Yang, Kai-Cheng
    Varol, Onur
    Davis, Clayton A.
    Ferrara, Emilio
    Flammini, Alessandro
    Menczer, Filippo
    HUMAN BEHAVIOR AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 1 (01) : 48 - 61
  • [45] We need to chat about artificial intelligence
    Squires, Emily
    Bacchi, Stephen
    Maddison, John
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2023, 219 (08) : 394 - 394
  • [46] We need to chat about artificial intelligence
    Coiera, Enrico W.
    Verspoor, Karin
    Hansen, David P.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2023, 219 (03) : 98 - 100
  • [47] Symptom Based Triage Tool in Ophthalmology
    Meer, Elana
    Ramakrishnan, Meera Suja
    Whitehead, Gideon
    VanderBeek, Brian L.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [48] CLINICAL EVALUATION OF DEM DX OPHTHALMOLOGY TRIAGE SYSTEM (DOTS) FOR A&E REFERRALS: AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL
    Melo, Mariane
    Sanghi, Priyanka
    Brandao-de-Resende, Camilo
    Jindal, Anish
    Neo, Yan Ning
    Lee, Elsa
    Keane, Pearse
    Hay, Gordon
    Day, Alex
    EYE, 2024, 38 : 170 - 170
  • [49] Telephone Based Telemedicine Triage in Ophthalmology
    Kahan, Elias H.
    Shin, Joshua D.
    Jansen, Michael E.
    Parker, Rebecca Hughes
    Parikh, Ravi
    SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 38 (03) : 294 - 305
  • [50] A survey of clinicians on the use of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology, dermatology, radiology and radiation oncology
    Jane Scheetz
    Philip Rothschild
    Myra McGuinness
    Xavier Hadoux
    H. Peter Soyer
    Monika Janda
    James J.J. Condon
    Luke Oakden-Rayner
    Lyle J. Palmer
    Stuart Keel
    Peter van Wijngaarden
    Scientific Reports, 11