Techno-Economic Analysis of Biodiesel Production from Chlorella vulgaris Using Different Potential Biorefinery Approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Sudhanthiran M.C. [1 ]
Muttu Pandian P. [1 ]
Febin Mathew [1 ]
M. Perumalsamy [1 ]
机构
[1] National Institute of Technology,Bioseparation Engineering Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering
[2] Tamil Nadu,undefined
关键词
Microalgae; In situ transesterification; Solvent extraction; Heat integration; Optimization;
D O I
10.1007/s12155-025-10823-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biodiesel from microalgae offers a renewable alternative to fossil fuels, with carbon dioxide utilization and capturing lipids without competing with food resources. The extraction, drying, and transesterification processes play a crucial role in converting raw biomass into high-quality biofuel. In this article, Chlorella vulgaris was grown in optimized conditions to improve the lipid content, and biodiesel was synthesized. Lipid content was evaluated from microalgal biomass, and the obtained data were given as input to two different production pathways, viz. solvent extraction and in situ transesterification. When utilizing the extraction and drying processes in the former method, it was discovered that they are the major cost contributors, which were eliminated in the latter through in situ transesterification. Optimization of various operating variables, such as methanol-oil molar ratio, reaction time, reaction temperature, number of stages, feed stage for distillation columns, and water and hexane flow rate for recovery of FAME, was studied in the simulation process. The solvent extraction method achieved 92% oil conversion, with 98% methanol recovery and 96% ester recovery after distillation. The in situ transesterification process achieved 92% oil-to-FAME conversion, with a payback period of 1.72 years for the non-heat integrated process and 1.88 years for the heat-integrated process. Capital costs were $3.48 million (non-heat integrated) and $4.51 million (heat integrated) compared to solvent extraction at $5.05 million (non-heat integrated) and $6.49 million (heat integrated), demonstrating superior economic efficiency. A techno-economic analysis reveals that in situ transesterification has the lowest capital cost and payback period but higher operating costs due to methanol usage; however, with process intensification and optimized configurations, it could become a commercially viable approach for biodiesel production. Regulatory frameworks and infrastructure investment support scalability, while eliminating costly steps like drying enhances economic and environmental sustainability.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Kinetic modelling and techno-economic analysis of biodiesel production from Calophyllum inophyllum oil
    Arumugam, A.
    Gopinath, K.
    Anuse, P.
    Shwetha, B.
    Ponnusami, V
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2019, 9 (02) : 363 - 378
  • [22] Comparative Techno-economic Analysis of Biodiesel Production from Microalgae via Transesterification Methods
    Bello, Binta Z.
    Nwokoagbara, Ezinne
    Wang, Meihong
    22 EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2012, 30 : 132 - 136
  • [23] Biodiesel and Hydrogen Production in a Combined Palm and Jatropha Biomass Biorefinery: Simulation, Techno-Economic, and Environmental Evaluation
    Nino-Villalobos, Antonio
    Puello-Yarce, Jaime
    Dario Gonzalez-Delgado, Angel
    Ojeda, K. A.
    Sanchez-Tuiran, Eduardo
    ACS OMEGA, 2020, 5 (13): : 7074 - 7084
  • [24] Kinetic modelling and techno-economic analysis of biodiesel production from Calophyllum inophyllum oil
    A. Arumugam
    K. Gopinath
    P. Anuse
    B. Shwetha
    V. Ponnusami
    Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2019, 9 : 363 - 378
  • [25] Comparative Techno-Economic Analysis of Transesterification Technologies for Microalgal Biodiesel Production
    Heo, Hyun Young
    Heo, Seongmin
    Lee, Jay H.
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2019, 58 (40) : 18772 - 18779
  • [26] Whole sweet sorghum plant as a promising feedstock for biobutanol production via biorefinery approaches: Techno-economic analysis
    Dehghanzad, Mahsa
    Shafiei, Marzieh
    Karimi, Keikhosro
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 158 : 332 - 342
  • [27] BIOGAS BIOREFINERY: TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF SEVERAL PATHS
    Kutsay, A.
    Kratky, L.
    Jirout, T.
    PAPERS OF THE 25TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE, 2017, : 1214 - 1225
  • [28] Techno-economic analysis for a sugarcane biorefinery: Colombian case
    Moncada, Jonathan
    El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M.
    Cardona, Carlos A.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 135 : 533 - 543
  • [29] Techno-Economic Assessment and Risk Analysis of Biorefinery Processes
    Hytoenen, Eemeli
    Stuart, Paul
    21ST EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2011, 29 : 1376 - 1380
  • [30] Uncertainty analysis and global sensitivity analysis of techno-economic assessments for biodiesel production
    Tang, Zhang-Chun
    Lu Zhenzhou
    Liu Zhiwen
    Xiao Ningcong
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 175 : 502 - 508