Probabilistic Study of Liquefaction Response of Soil Based on Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Data Using Machine Learning Techniques

被引:1
|
作者
Mustafa, Rashid [1 ]
Ahmad, Md Talib [2 ]
机构
[1] Katihar Engn Coll Katihar, Dept Civil Engn, Katihar 854109, Bihar, India
[2] Katihar Engn Coll Katihar, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Katihar 854109, Bihar, India
关键词
Liquefaction; CRR; CSR; SPT; SVR; RF; DNN; DETERMINISTIC ASSESSMENT; STOCK;
D O I
10.1007/s40515-024-00498-0
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
It is difficult and time consuming to evaluate the possibility for liquefaction using traditional experimental or empirical analysis techniques. This study offers SPT-based liquefaction datasets to evaluate the liquefaction potential of soil deposits using a variety of machine learning models: support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), and deep neural network (DNN). 300 datasets are generated to build machine learning models (210 random datasets for the training purpose and 90 random datasets for testing purpose). To predict the factor of safety (FOS) against liquefaction, these three machine learning models consider seven important input parameters, namely depth, total vertical stress, effective vertical stress, SPT blow count, fine content, earthquake magnitude, and peak horizontal ground acceleration. The relationship between soil and seismic factors, and the FOS against soil liquefaction was also investigated using a Pearson correlation matrix. The effectiveness of the machine learning models is evaluated using a variety of performance metrics, such as coefficient of determination (R2), Willmott's index of agreement, variance account factor, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error and maximum absolute error. Based on performance criteria, the results indicate that DNN had the best prediction performance out of the three machine learning models. This refers to highest R2 = 0.972 and the lowest RMSE = 0.026 during the training phase, and maximum value of R2 = 0.870 and minimum value of RMSE = 0.062 during testing phase. The predictive power of the suggested model was also evaluated by the use of multiple performance indices, such as rank analysis, reliability index, regression curve, Taylor diagram, objective function criterion, and performance strength criterion. Additionally, these models' robustness was evaluated using external validation and comparative analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A smarter approach to liquefaction risk: harnessing dynamic cone penetration test data and machine learning for safer infrastructure
    Singh, Shubhendu Vikram
    Ghani, Sufyan
    FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 10
  • [42] An Enhanced Soil Characterization Study Supported by Resistivity Data Processing and Standard Penetration Test
    Tello, Marcos
    Pulz, Lucas T. C.
    Tello, Victor B.
    Ferraz, Renato G.
    Vidor, Fabio F.
    Gazzana, Daniel S.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2022, 58 (01) : 49 - 58
  • [43] Prediction of soil type and standard penetration test (SPT) value in Khulna City, Bangladesh using general regression neural network
    Sarkar, Grytan
    Siddiqua, Sumi
    Banik, Rajib
    Rokonuzzaman, Md.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY, 2015, 48 (3-4) : 190 - 203
  • [44] Prediction of soil liquefaction for railway embankment resting on fine soil deposits using enhanced machine learning techniques
    Ghani, Sufyan
    Kumari, Sunita
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2023, 132 (03)
  • [45] Prediction of soil liquefaction for railway embankment resting on fine soil deposits using enhanced machine learning techniques
    Sufyan Ghani
    Sunita Kumari
    Journal of Earth System Science, 132
  • [46] Comparative System Reliability Analysis of Liquefaction Potential Using Standard Penetration Test and Shear Wave Velocity Data
    Fooladi, H.
    Johari, A.
    Behzadi, M.
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 42 (08) : 7635 - 7653
  • [47] Comparative Study between Two Performance-Based Liquefaction Triggering Models for the Standard Penetration Test
    Franke, Kevin W.
    Wright, Alexander D.
    Ekstrom, Levi T.
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 140 (05)
  • [48] Unsupervised machine learning for detecting soil layer boundaries from cone penetration test data
    Hudson, Kenneth S.
    Ulmer, Kristin J.
    Zimmaro, Paolo
    Kramer, Steven L.
    Stewart, Jonathan P.
    Brandenberg, Scott J.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2023, 52 (11): : 3201 - 3215
  • [49] A multiple model machine learning approach for soil classification from cone penetration test data
    Carvalho, Lucas O.
    Ribeiro, Dimas B.
    SOILS AND ROCKS, 2021, 44 (04):
  • [50] Streamflow Data Infilling Using Machine Learning Techniques with Gamma Test
    Saad Dahmani
    Sarmad Dashti Latif
    Water Resources Management, 2024, 38 (2) : 701 - 716