Optimization of Geofoam Shape for Earth Pressure Reduction on Debris Flow Barriers

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Jaekyoung [1 ]
Lee, Jihoon [2 ]
Kang, Junsuk [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Gangneung Wonju Natl Univ, Dept Environm Landscape Architecture, Kangnung, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture & Rural Syst Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Interdisciplinary Program Landscape Architecture, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Transdisciplinary Program Smart City Global Conver, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
RETAINING WALLS;
D O I
10.1007/s11204-024-09977-5
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
A debris flow barrier is a structure used to prevent erosion caused by debris flow, and is typically installed in countries with mountainous areas, such as Korea. However, owing to earth pressure, several debris flow barriers become damaged. Geofoam is a reinforcement material widely used in the design of debris flow barriers, not only in dams/retaining walls but also in bridges and landscaping. The purpose of this study was to examine the lateral earth pressure reduction effect of geofoam on debris flow barriers, and to find an optimized geofoam shape that satisfies specific conditions. In this study, the debris flow barrier, backfill, geofoam, and foundation were modeled using ABAQUS, a two-dimensional finite element method program. Models A-C were simulated and compared at backfill lengths of 10, 20, and 40 m. The debris flow barrier model was used at a mountain slope of 25 degrees. To determine the geofoam shape and analyze the stability coefficients for sliding and overturning, ten diverse scenarios were considered. According to the results, Scenario 10, with a reversed triangle shape of geofoam, was the most effective in all cases, which reduces the earth pressure significantly. In the case of Model C, a reversed triangle geofoam reinforcement reduces the lateral earth pressure on the backside of the structure by an average of 34.43%.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 316
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Earth Pressure Distribution on Buried Pipes Installed with Geofoam Inclusion and Subjected to Cyclic Loading
    Mohamed A. Meguid
    Mahmoud R. Ahmed
    International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2020, 6
  • [22] Preliminary research on the design of flexible barriers for debris flow
    Huan ZHANG
    Lizhou ZHANG
    机床与液压, 2014, 42 (06) : 1 - 4
  • [23] Debris flow runup on vertical barriers and adverse slopes
    Iverson, Richard M.
    George, David L.
    Logan, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, 2016, 121 (12) : 2333 - 2357
  • [24] Short- and long-term behavior of EPS geofoam in reduction of lateral earth pressure on rigid retaining wall subjected to surcharge loading
    Gade, Vinil Kumar
    Dasaka, S. M.
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2022, 50 (05) : 868 - 880
  • [25] A debris flow induced by the collapse of a reinforced earth wall
    Chen, R. H.
    Chen, K. S.
    GEOSYNTHETICS, VOLS 1-4, 2006, : 1089 - +
  • [26] Reduction of Lateral Earth Forces Acting on Rigid Nonyielding Retaining Walls by EPS Geofoam Inclusions
    Ertugrul, Ozgur L.
    Trandafir, Aurelian C.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, 23 (12) : 1711 - 1718
  • [27] Active earth pressure on non-yielding retaining walls with geofoam blocks and granular backfills
    Fan, Kewei
    Yan, Jun
    Zou, Weilie
    Han, Zhong
    Lai, Zhiqiang
    TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2022, 33
  • [28] The influence of hillslope shape on debris-flow initiation
    Wieczorek, GF
    Mandrone, G
    DeCola, L
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION & ASSESSMENT, 1997, : 21 - 31
  • [29] NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF DEBRIS-FLOW INTERACTION WITH OPEN BARRIERS
    Marchelli, Maddalena
    Leonardi, Alessandro
    Pirulli, Marina
    V INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARTICLE-BASED METHODS - FUNDAMENTALS AND APPLICATIONS (PARTICLES 2017), 2017, : 837 - 848
  • [30] Impact pressure of debris flow on beam dam
    Wang, Dong-wei
    You, Yong
    Liu, Jin-feng
    Sun, Hao
    Wang, Zhuang
    JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE, 2023, 20 (10) : 2822 - 2834