An ambiguity subset selection algorithm based on the variation of check factors for BDS-3/BDS-2/GPS precise point positioning

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Fangchao [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Cheng [2 ]
Li, Qi [3 ,4 ]
Yang, Jie [1 ]
Gao, Jingxiang [2 ]
Psimoulis, Panos [5 ]
Niu, Le [3 ,4 ]
Kou, Xiaomei [3 ,4 ]
Meng, Xiaolin [6 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Acad Forestry, Coll Forestry, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Environm Sci & Spatial Informat, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China
[3] Power China Northwest Engn Corp Ltd, Xian 710065, Peoples R China
[4] Shaanxi Union Res Ctr Univ & Enterprise River & La, Sch Informat Engn, Xian 710065, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Geospatial Inst, Nottingham NG7 2TU, England
[6] Southeast Univ, Sch Instrument Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
关键词
Precise point positioning; Partial ambiguity resolution; Ambiguity check factors; Positioning accuracy; PPP; RESOLUTION; GPS; TIME; GNSS; DEFORMATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10291-024-01803-7
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
The ambiguity resolution (AR) technology effectively accelerates convergence and improves precise point positioning (PPP) accuracy. Many observations involved in the calculation can enhance the accuracy of parameter estimation. Still, it can also introduce unmodeled errors, making it difficult to fix ambiguities, especially in multiple global navigation satellite system (GNSS). This paper presents a novel PPP Partial-AR (PAR) method to enhance Precise Point Positioning (PPP) performance by selecting an ambiguity subset based on the variation of ambiguity check factors, including the ratio, ambiguity dilution of precision (ADOP), and Bootstrapping success rate. The proposed method is validated using post-processing and real-time static and kinematic datasets across five GNSS integration modes involving the global positioning system (GPS) and BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS), demonstrating that PPP Partial-AR (PAR) outperforms the method that fixes all ambiguities, known as PPP Full-AR (FAR). The static and kinematic post-processing experiment shows that PPP-PAR, compared with PPP-FAR, increases the ambiguity epoch fixing rate from 84.6 and 79.5% to 94.2 and 91.9%, decreases the time to first fix (TTFF) from 21.4 and 31.1 min to 17.7 and 25.4 min, and reduces the root mean square error (RMSE) from 12.7/11.3/32.2 and 21.7/19.4/51.8 mm to 11.5/10.3/30.9 and 19.1/18.1/48.9 mm in the north-east-up directions, respectively. The static and kinematic real-time experiment shows that PPP-PAR, compared with PPP-FAR, increases the ambiguity epoch fixing rate from 80.1 and 71.7% to 91.8 and 86.6%, decreases the TTFF from 29.5 and 35.5 min to 25.2 and 28.7 min, and reduces the RMS from 22.4/19.4/45.9 and 33.8/26.9/65.2 mm to 18.6/17.1/42.0 and 29.2/23.6/60.5 mm in the north-east-up directions, respectively. Moreover, the real-time experiments with actual kinematic data show that the proposed method significantly improves the ambiguity epoch fixing rate from 43.3% for PPP-FAR to 50.7% for PPP-PAR, and increases the positioning accuracy with an RMS value of 0.28/0.21/0.57 m for the PPP float solution, 0.23/0.19/0.55 m for the PPP-FAR solution towards 0.21/0.18/0.53 m for the PPP-PAR solution.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Precise Point Positioning with Almost Fully Deployed BDS-3, BDS-2, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and QZSS Using Precise Products from Different Analysis Centers
    Li, Xuanping
    Pan, Lin
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [22] BDS-3/GNSS Uncombined Precise Point Positioning
    Cao X.
    Shen F.
    Li J.
    Zhang S.
    Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2023, 48 (01): : 92 - 100
  • [23] Modeling and performance assessment of BDS-2/BDS-3 triple-frequency ionosphere-free and uncombined precise point positioning
    Zhu, Shaolin
    Yue, Dongjie
    He, Lina
    Chen, Jian
    Liu, Zhiqiang
    MEASUREMENT, 2021, 180
  • [24] Improving BDS-2 and BDS-3 Integrated Satellite Clock Determination with Inter-system Bias Estimation for Precise Point Positioning
    Jiao, Guoqiang
    Song, Shuli
    Su, Ke
    Liu, Yangyang
    CHINA SATELLITE NAVIGATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, CSNC 2022, VOL III, 2022, 910 : 113 - 133
  • [25] Comparison of convergence time and positioning accuracy among BDS, GPS and BDS/GPS precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution
    Liu, Xuexi
    Jiang, Weiping
    Li, Zhao
    Chen, Hua
    Zhao, Wen
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (11) : 3489 - 3504
  • [26] Triple-frequency PPP ambiguity resolution with BDS-2 and BDS-3 observations
    Li, Xin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE SATELLITE DIVISION OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION (ION GNSS+ 2018), 2018, : 3833 - 3858
  • [27] Elevating performance in BDS-3 Precise Point Positioning Ambiguity Resolution LEO constellations
    He, Lina
    Dai, Weicheng
    Wang, Hu
    He, Xiangxiang
    Zhou, You
    Liu, Chang
    MEASUREMENT, 2024, 236
  • [28] Kinematic precise point positioning ambiguity resolution for GNSS with BDS-3 new signal
    Li, Zengke
    Chen, Zhaobing
    Liu, Zan
    Gao, Jingxiang
    Zhao, Long
    Xu, Lei
    Zhongguo Kuangye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2022, 51 (06): : 1222 - 1231
  • [29] Model comparison and performance analysis of multi-frequency precise positioning with the joint BDS-2 and BDS-3 system
    Deng, Chenlong
    Qi, Shufeng
    Tang, Weiming
    Hui, Mengtang
    Zou, Xuan
    Wang, Yawei
    Li, Yangyang
    Guo, Chi
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2022, 69 (08) : 3044 - 3058
  • [30] Evaluation of BDS-2 and BDS-3 Satellite Atomic Clock Products and Their Effects on Positioning
    Gu, Shengfeng
    Mao, Feiyu
    Gong, Xiaopeng
    Lou, Yidong
    Xu, Xueyong
    Zhou, Ye
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (24)