Feature-Driven Density Prediction of Maraging Steel Additively Manufactured Samples Using Pyrometer Sensor and Supervised Machine Learning

被引:0
|
作者
Balaraman, Rajesh Kumar [1 ]
Hussain, Shaista [2 ]
Ong, John Kgee [1 ]
Tan, Qing Yang [1 ]
Raghavan, Nagarajan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Univ Technol & Design, Engn Prod Dev EPD Pillar, Singapore 487372, Singapore
[2] A STAR Inst High Performance Comp IHPC, Computat Intelligence Grp, Singapore 138632, Singapore
[3] Singapore Univ Technol & Design, Digital Mfg & Design DManD Ctr, Singapore 487372, Singapore
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2024年 / 12卷
关键词
Maraging steel; additive manufacturing; pyrometer data; machine learning; POWDER BED FUSION; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; ENERGY DENSITY; MICROSTRUCTURE; OPTIMIZATION; DEFECT; ALLOY;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3486731
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) is a revolutionizing additive manufacturing (AM) that melts the powder particles to create innovative products, but it faces substantial challenges in monitoring and predicting the quality of the printed samples. Traditional density measurement methods, like the Archimedes technique, have been employed to determine the density of maraging steel samples produced under varying machine settings (MACH-S) process parameters, including laser power and scan speed. However, these machine-dependent parameters alone are insufficient for accurately predicting part density. To address this issue, an optical coaxial pyrometer in the AconityMINI system was utilized to capture thermal emissivity data, from which six statistical pyrometer-driven (PYRO-D) features, such as mean, median, and standard deviation, were extracted. The proposed feature-driven model then interprets machine settings and pyrometer data into physics-based (PHYS-B) features, including laser energy density, radiation pressure, intensity, temperature, and wavelength. With these three sets of input features, the study investigates the effectiveness of four supervised machine learning (ML) regression models: Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), for predicting the density of printed samples. The performance of these models was enhanced through three hyperparameter optimization (HPO) techniques: Random Search (RS), Grid Search (GS), and Bayes Search (BS), alongside a feature selection (FS) method to refine the input feature dimensions. The findings indicate that RS is the most effective HPO technique across all models and highlight the significance of MACH-S and PHYS-B features in improving model predictions over PYRO-D features, achieving an R2 score of 0.948 and a mean-squared error (MSE) of 0.007. Finally, the feature-driven model incorporating optimal machine, pyrometer, and physical features was utilized for density prediction through ML. Future research will aim to extend this approach to predict layer-wise part quality by incorporating a broader range of process parameters, focusing on understanding influencing factors such as porosity and surface roughness in AM printed parts.
引用
收藏
页码:172892 / 172909
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [31] Data-driven shear strength prediction of steel fiber reinforced concrete beams using machine learning approach
    Rahman, Jesika
    Ahmed, Khondaker Sakil
    Khan, Nafiz Imtiaz
    Islam, Kamrul
    Mangalathu, Sujith
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 233 (233)
  • [32] Data-driven total organic carbon prediction using feature selection methods incorporated in an automated machine learning framework
    Macedo, Bruno da Silva
    Wayo, Dennis Delali Kwesi
    Campos, Deivid
    De Santis, Rodrigo Barbosa
    Martinho, Alfeu Dias
    Yaseen, Zaher Mundher
    Saporetti, Camila Martins
    Goliatt, Leonardo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [33] Surface roughness prediction of AISI D2 tool steel during powder mixed EDM using supervised machine learning
    Kaigude, Amreeta R.
    Khedkar, Nitin K.
    Jatti, Vijaykumar S.
    Salunkhe, Sachin
    Cep, Robert
    Nasr, Emad Abouel
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [34] Data-driven resilient model development and feature selection for rock compressive strength prediction using machine learning and transformer techniques
    Rahaman, Md. Shakil
    Miah, Mohammad Islam
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2025, 18 (03)
  • [35] Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Bioelectromagnetics: Prediction Models and Feature Selection Techniques Using Data from Weak Radiofrequency Radiation Effect on Human and Animals Cells
    Halgamuge, Malka N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (12) : 1 - 27
  • [36] Chemical Class Prediction of Unknown Biomolecules Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry and Machine Learning: Supervised Inference of Feature Taxonomy from Ensemble Randomization
    Picache, Jaqueline A.
    May, Jody C.
    McLean, John A.
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 92 (15) : 10759 - 10767
  • [37] Life Prediction for Directed Energy Deposition-Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel using a Coupled Crystal Plasticity-Machine Learning Framework
    Ye, Wenye
    Zhang, Xing
    Hohl, Jake
    Liao, Yiliang
    Mushongera, Leslie T.
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS, 2023, 25 (10)
  • [38] Data-driven compressive strength prediction of steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC) subjected to elevated temperatures using stacked machine learning algorithms
    Shafighfard, Torkan
    Bagherzadeh, Faramarz
    Rizi, Rana Abdollahi
    Yoo, Doo-Yeol
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T, 2022, 21 : 3777 - 3794
  • [39] Robust prediction and validation of as-built density of Ti-6Al-4V parts manufactured via selective laser melting using a machine learning approach
    Maitra, Varad
    Shi, Jing
    Lu, Cuiyuan
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2022, 78 : 183 - 201
  • [40] Data-driven density prediction of AlSi10Mg parts produced by laser powder bed fusion using machine learning and finite element simulation
    Bossen, Bastian
    Kuehne, Maxim
    Kristanovski, Oleg
    Emmelmann, Claus
    JOURNAL OF LASER APPLICATIONS, 2023, 35 (04)