The uncertainty and deviation evaluation of system tracks and motion models

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Gong, Fengxun [2 ]
Ma, Yanqiu [2 ]
Lyv, Peipei [1 ]
机构
[1] CDatc, The Second Research Institute of CAAC, Chengdu,610042, China
[2] School of electronic information and automation, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin,300300, China
关键词
Air navigation - Air traffic control - Air transportation - Aircraft detection - Error statistics - Flight paths - Flight simulators - Kalman filters - Radar simulators - Radar tracking;
D O I
10.13695/j.cnki.12-1222/o3.2024.07.011
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Track uncertainty and deviation directly affect the reliability of flight conflict detection and resolution, and are extremely important for trajectory-based operation. For systems track quality evaluation, a system track uncertainty and deviation model based on track points uncertainty and its root mean square error set is presented. The reference track is set as the track with the track points error not exceeding the protection range within 95% of the flight time. Based on the error probability density and t-distribution function of the track points set, therefore, the system track uncertainty and deviation model are constructed. The simulation and actual air traffic control radar data evaluation results are shown that, compared with the Kalman filtering algorithm model, the proposed model directly provides the degree of error deviation and its distribution state, which can obtain the track data and motion model quality more quickly and intuitively. The uncertainty and deviation models can be used for implementing the graphic and numerical evaluation of system track and motion model, proving that the proposed model has good practical value. © 2024 Editorial Department of Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:724 / 732
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Determining output uncertainty of computer system models
    Gluhovsky, Ilya
    PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, 2007, 64 (02) : 103 - 125
  • [42] Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation of Railway Tracks: System Description and Assessment
    Morais, Joao
    Santos, Carlos
    Morais, Paulo
    Paixao, Andre
    Fortunato, Eduardo
    Asseiceiro, Francisco
    Alvarenga, Paula
    Gomes, Luis
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY (ICSI 2019), 2019, 17 : 448 - 455
  • [43] Evaluation, existence and optimization of reactive strategies in motion planning with uncertainty
    RodriguezLucatero, C
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 1997, 12 (01) : 147 - 152
  • [45] Quantification of source-to-site distance uncertainty in ground motion models
    Saman Yaghmaei-Sabegh
    Mehdi Ebrahimi-Aghabagher
    Natural Hazards, 2019, 99 : 287 - 306
  • [46] Learning from others: an experimental test of Brownian motion uncertainty models
    Glick, David
    Myers, C. Daniel
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL POLITICS, 2015, 27 (04) : 588 - 612
  • [47] Methods for assessing the epistemic uncertainty captured in ground-motion models
    Guillermo Aldama-Bustos
    John Douglas
    Fleur O. Strasser
    Manuela Daví
    Alice MacGregor
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2023, 21 : 1 - 26
  • [48] Generalized uncertainty relations and entanglement dynamics in quantum Brownian motion models
    Anastopoulos, C.
    Kechribaris, S.
    Mylonas, D.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2010, 82 (04)
  • [49] Quantification of source-to-site distance uncertainty in ground motion models
    Yaghmaei-Sabegh, Saman
    Ebrahimi-Aghabagher, Mehdi
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2019, 99 (01) : 287 - 306
  • [50] Methods for assessing the epistemic uncertainty captured in ground-motion models
    Aldama-Bustos, Guillermo
    Douglas, John
    Strasser, Fleur O.
    Davi, Manuela
    MacGregor, Alice
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2023, 21 (01) : 1 - 26