Improving Top-Down Sequence Coverage with Targeted Fragment Matching

被引:0
|
作者
Robey, Matthew T. [1 ]
Durbin, Kenneth R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Proteinaceous, Inc., Evanston,IL,60208, United States
关键词
Number: 2R44GM130262,2R44GM136046, Acronym: NIH, Sponsor: National Institutes of Health, Number: -, Acronym: NIH, Sponsor: National Institutes of Health,;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Top-down mass spectrometry (TDMS) of intact proteins and antibodies enables direct determination of truncations, sequence variants, post-translational modifications, and disulfides without the need for any proteolytic cleavage. While mass deconvolution of top-down tandem mass spectra is typically used to identify fragment masses for matching to candidate proteoforms, larger molecules such as monoclonal antibodies can produce many fragment ions, making spectral interpretation challenging. Here, we explore an alternative approach for proteoform spectral matching that is better suited for larger protein analysis. This workflow uses direct matching of theoretical proteoform isotopic distributions to TDMS spectra, avoiding drawbacks of mass deconvolution such as poor sensitivity and problems differentiating overlapping distributions. Using a data set that analyzed an intact NIST monoclonal antibody across different fragmentation modes, we show that this isotope fitting strategy increased the sequence coverage of both light and heavy chain sequences >3-fold. We further found that isotope fitting is particularly amenable to identifying large fragments, including those near the hinge region that have been traditionally difficult to analyze by top-down methods. These advances in proteoform spectral matching can greatly increase the power of top-down analyses for intact biotherapeutics and other large molecules. © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:3296 / 3300
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Ups and Downs of Repeated Cleavage and Internal Fragment Production in Top-Down Proteomics
    Lyon, Yana A.
    Riggs, Dylan
    Fornelli, Luca
    Compton, Philip D.
    Julian, Ryan R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2018, 29 (01) : 150 - 157
  • [42] Top-Down Sparse Fuzzy Regression Modeling from Data with Improved Coverage
    Lughofer, Edwin
    Kindermann, Stefan
    Pratama, Mahardhika
    de Jesus Rubio, Jose
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 19 (05) : 1645 - 1658
  • [43] Top-down motif discovery in biological sequence datasets by genetic algorithm
    Baloglu, Ulas Baran
    Kaya, Mehmet
    [J]. 2006 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HYBRID INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 103 - +
  • [44] TOP-DOWN TREE-TRANSDUCERS WITH DETERMINISTIC TOP-DOWN LOOK-AHEAD
    FULOP, Z
    VAGVOLGYI, S
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 1989, 33 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [45] Matching bottom-up and top-down for verification and integration of LCI databases
    Weidema, BP
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON QUALITY OF LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY (LCI) DATA, 2004, 6941 : 59 - 61
  • [46] BRAINS TOP DOWN: IS TOP-DOWN CAUSATION CHALLENGING NEUROSCIENCE?
    Wiest, Michael C.
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 2014, 89 (01): : 65 - 66
  • [47] TOOLS FOR TOP-DOWN TESTING
    BARBUTO, PF
    GELLER, J
    [J]. DATAMATION, 1978, 24 (10): : 178 - &
  • [48] Geophysics - Top-down tectonics?
    Anderson, DL
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5537) : 2016 - 2018
  • [49] A Top-Down Parallel Semisort
    Gu, Yan
    Shun, Julian
    Sun, Yihan
    Blelloch, Guy E.
    [J]. SPAA'15: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH ACM SYMPOSIUM ON PARALLELISM IN ALGORITHMS AND ARCHITECTURES, 2015, : 24 - 34
  • [50] DEPRESSING TRAFFIC TOP-DOWN
    BURROUGHS, D
    JIANG, SS
    HENSON, H
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1994, 64 (01): : 62 - 64