Bias Mitigation Methods: Applicability, Legality, and Recommendations for Development

被引:0
|
作者
Waller, Madeleine [1 ]
Rodrigues, Odinaldo [1 ]
Ah Lee, Michelle Seng [2 ]
Cocarascu, Oana [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Informatics, King’s College, London, United Kingdom
[2] Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
来源
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research | 2024年 / 81卷
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Algorithmics - Decision-making systems - European union - Key factors - Legal requirements - Mitigation methods - Pressung - Real-world scenario - United kingdom;
D O I
10.1613/jair.1.16759
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As algorithmic decision-making systems (ADMS) are increasingly deployed across various sectors, the importance of research on fairness in Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to grow. In this paper we highlight a number of significant practical limitations and regulatory compliance issues associated with the application of existing bias mitigation methods to ADMS. We present an example of an algorithmic system used in recruitment to illustrate these limitations. Our analysis of existing methods indicates a pressing need for a change in the approach to the development of new methods. In order to address the limitations, we provide recommendations for key factors to consider in the development of new bias mitigation methods that aim to be effective in real-world scenarios and comply with legal requirements in the European Union, United Kingdom and United States, such as non-discrimination, data protection and sector-specific regulations. Further, we suggest a checklist relating to these recommendations that should be included with the development of new bias mitigation methods. ©2024 The Authors.
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1078
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ViG-Bias: Visually Grounded Bias Discovery and Mitigation
    Marani, Badr-Eddine
    Hanini, Mohamed
    Malayarukil, Nihitha
    Christodoulidis, Stergios
    Vakalopoulou, Maria
    Ferrante, Enzo
    COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2024, PT LIX, 2025, 15117 : 414 - 429
  • [32] Improving the Applicability and Feasibility of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Primary Care: Recommendations for Guideline Development and Implementation
    Han, Lu
    Zeng, Linan
    Duan, Yanjun
    Chen, Kexin
    Yu, Jiajie
    Li, Honghao
    Yi, Qiusha
    Li, Youping
    Zhang, Lingli
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2021, 14 : 3473 - 3482
  • [33] Japan's ODA and the WCD recommendations: Applicability of comprehensive options assessment in JICA development studies
    Mori, K
    Fujikura, R
    Nakayama, M
    WATER INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 29 (03) : 352 - 361
  • [34] Economic development, legality, and the transplant effect
    Berkowitz, D
    Pistor, K
    Richard, JF
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 47 (01) : 165 - 195
  • [35] Methods and development of therapy recommendations for symptom control in palliative medicine
    Radbruch, L.
    Alt-Epping, B.
    Rolke, R.
    Ujeyl, M.
    Nauck, F.
    SCHMERZ, 2012, 26 (05): : 475 - +
  • [36] Appendix I: Methods for the development of evidence-based recommendations
    Mrukowicz, Jacek
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2008, 46 : S49 - S75
  • [37] Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods
    Haghani, Milad
    Bliemer, Michiel C. J.
    Rose, John M.
    Oppewal, Harmen
    Lancsar, Emily
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2021, 41
  • [38] Applicability of diagnostic recommendations on dementia in family practice
    van Hout, H
    Vernooij-Dassen, M
    Poels, P
    Hoefnagels, W
    Grol, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2001, 13 (02) : 127 - 133
  • [39] A Computational Framework for Media Bias Mitigation
    Park, Souneil
    Kang, Seungwoo
    Chung, Sangyoung
    Song, Junehwa
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2012, 2 (02)
  • [40] A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias
    Maime Guan
    Joachim Vandekerckhove
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2016, 23 : 74 - 86