Spatio-temporal Graph-Based Generation and Detection of Adversarial False Data Injection Evasion Attacks in Smart Grids

被引:0
|
作者
Takiddin, Abdulrahman [1 ]
Ismail, Muhammad [2 ]
Atat, Rachad [3 ]
Serpedin, Erchin [4 ]
机构
[1] Florida State University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Tallahassee,FL,32310, United States
[2] Tennessee Tech University, Department of Computer Science, Cookeville,TN,38505, United States
[3] Lebanese American University, Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Beirut,1102-2801, Lebanon
[4] Texas A&M University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College Station,TX,77843, United States
来源
关键词
Auto encoders - Cyber-attacks - Cyber-physical system securities - Evasion attack - False data injection - False data injection attacks - Graph autoencoder - Graph neural networks - Machine-learning - Smart grid;
D O I
10.1109/TAI.2024.3464511
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Smart power grids are vulnerable to security threats due to their cyber-physical nature. Existing data-driven detectors aim to address simple traditional false data injection attacks (FDIAs). However, adversarial false data injection evasion attacks (FDIEAs) present a more serious threat as adversaries, with different levels of knowledge about the system, inject adversarial samples to circumvent the grid's attack detection system. The robustness of state-of-the-art graph-based detectors has not been investigated against sophisticated FDIEAs. Hence, this article answers three research questions. 1) What is the impact of utilizing spatio-temporal features to craft adversarial samples and how to select attack nodes? 2) How can adversaries generate surrogate spatio-temporal data when they lack knowledge about the system topology? 3) What are the required model characteristics for a robust detection against adversarial FDIEAs? To answer the questions, we examine the robustness of several detectors against five attack cases and conclude the following: 1) Attack generation with full knowledge using spatio-temporal features leads to 5%-26% and 2%-5% higher degradation in detection rate (DR) compared to traditional FDIAs and using temporal features, respectively, whereas centrality analysis-based attack node selection leads to 3%-11% higher degradation in DR compared to a random selection; 2) Stochastic geometry-based graph generation to create surrogate adversarial topologies and samples leads to 3%-13% higher degradation in DR compared to traditional FDIAs; and 3) Adopting an unsupervised spatio-temporal graph autoencoder (STGAE)-based detector enhances the DR by 5-53% compared to benchmark detectors against FDIEAs. © 2020 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:6601 / 6616
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of deep learning algorithms for site detection of false data injection attacks in smart grids
    Nasir, Qassim
    Abu Talib, Manar
    Arshad, Muhammad Arbab
    Ishak, Tracy
    Berrim, Romaissa
    Alsaid, Basma
    Badway, Youssef
    Abu Waraga, Omnia
    Energy Informatics, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [42] Detection and Isolation of False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grids via Nonlinear Interval Observer
    Wang, Xinyu
    Luo, Xiaoyuan
    Zhang, Yuyan
    Guan, Xinping
    IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2019, 6 (04): : 6498 - 6512
  • [43] LSTM-Based False Data Injection Attack Detection in Smart Grids
    Zhao, Yi
    Jia, Xian
    An, Dou
    Yang, Qingyu
    2020 35TH YOUTH ACADEMIC ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF CHINESE ASSOCIATION OF AUTOMATION (YAC), 2020, : 638 - 644
  • [44] Spatio-temporal graph-based CNNs for anomaly detection in weakly-labeled videos
    Mu, Huiyu
    Sun, Ruizhi
    Wang, Miao
    Chen, Zeqiu
    INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 59 (04)
  • [45] Urban Event Detection from Spatio-temporal IoT Sensor Data Using Graph-Based Machine Learning
    Park, Dae-Young
    Ko, In-Young
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA AND SMART COMPUTING (IEEE BIGCOMP 2022), 2022, : 234 - 241
  • [46] Reinforcement Learning Based Vulnerability Analysis for Smart Grids Against False Data Injection Attacks
    Xu, Shiyu
    Yu, Shi
    Xiao, Liang
    Lv, Zefang
    WIRELESS ALGORITHMS, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS (WASA 2022), PT I, 2022, 13471 : 441 - 452
  • [47] UKF-based State Estimation for Smart Grids Under False Data Injection Attacks
    Li, Jin
    Zhang, Youmin
    2022 IEEE ELECTRICAL POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE (EPEC), 2022, : 374 - 379
  • [48] Deep learning-based identification of false data injection attacks on modern smart grids
    Mukherjee, Debottam
    Chakraborty, Samrat
    Abdelaziz, Almoataz Y.
    El-Shahat, Adel
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 919 - 930
  • [49] Sparse Malicious False Data Injection Attacks and Defense Mechanisms in Smart Grids
    Hao, Jinping
    Piechocki, Robert J.
    Kaleshi, Dritan
    Chin, Woon Hau
    Fan, Zhong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 11 (05) : 1198 - 1209
  • [50] ADVERSARIAL ANOMALY DETECTION FOR MARKED SPATIO-TEMPORAL STREAMING DATA
    Zhu, Shixiang
    Yuchi, Henry Shaowu
    Xie, Yao
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2020, : 8921 - 8925