Novel biomarkers for cardiovascular risk prediction

被引:0
|
作者
Juan WANG [1 ]
GuoJuan TAN [2 ]
LiNa HAN [1 ]
YongYi BAI [1 ]
Miao HE [3 ]
HongBin LIU [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Cardiology Internal Medicine, Nanlou Branch of Chinese PLA General Hospital
[2] Department of Radiology, Nanlou Branch of Chinese PLA General Hospital
[3] Department of Emergency, the Central Hospital of China National Petroleum
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cardiovascular disease(CVD) is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The primary prevention of CVD is dependent upon the ability to identify high-risk individuals long before the development of overt events. This highlights the need for accurate risk stratification. An increasing number of novel biomarkers have been identified to predict cardiovascular events. Biomarkers play a critical role in the definition, prognostication, and decision-making regarding the management of cardiovascular events. This review focuses on a variety of promising biomarkers that provide diagnostic and prognostic information. The myocardial tissue-specific biomarker cardiac troponin, highsensitivity assays for cardiac troponin, and heart-type fatty acid binding proteinall help diagnose myocardial infarction(MI) in the early hours following symptoms. Inflammatory markers such as growth differentiation factor-15, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and uric acid predict MI and death. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, myeloperoxidase, and matrix metalloproteinases predict the risk of acute coronary syndrome. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 and secretory phospholipase A2 predict incident and recurrent cardiovascular events. Finally, elevated natriuretic peptides, ST2, endothelin-1, mid-regional-pro-adrenomedullin, copeptin, and galectin-3 have all been well validated to predict death and heart failure following a MI and provide risk stratification information for heart failure. Rapidly developing new areas, such as assessment of micro-RNA, are also explored. All the biomarkers reflect different aspects of the development of atherosclerosis.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 150
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Novel and Emerging Biomarkers with Risk Predictive Utility for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
    Shah N.N.
    Rohatgi A.
    Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 2018, 12 (3)
  • [42] Do novel biomarkers add to existing scores of total cardiovascular risk?
    De Backer, Guy
    Graham, Ian
    Cooney, Marie-Therese
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 19 : 14 - 17
  • [43] Progress towards identifying biomarkers of vascular aging for total cardiovascular risk prediction
    Vlachopoulos, Charalambos
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2012, 30 : S19 - S26
  • [44] Novel biomarkers for cardiovascular risk assessment: current status and future directions
    MacNamara, James
    Eapen, Danny J.
    Quyyumi, Arshed
    Sperling, Laurence
    FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 11 (05) : 597 - 613
  • [45] Do we really need more new biomarkers for cardiovascular risk prediction?
    Nilsson, Peter M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (06) : 567 - 569
  • [46] Weekly Journal Scan: incremental utility of circulating biomarkers for cardiovascular risk prediction
    Vergallo, Rocco
    Patrono, Carlo
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [47] Circulating microRNA biomarkers for cardiovascular risk prediction: are we approaching clinical application?
    de Ronde, Maurice W. J.
    Pinto, Yigal M.
    Pinto-Sietsma, Sara-Joan
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (24)
  • [48] Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease in People with Type 1 Diabetes with Novel Omics Biomarkers
    Pyle, Laura
    Vigers, Timothy B.
    Johnson, Randi K.
    Zhang, Qibin
    Snell-Bergeon, Janet K.
    DIABETES, 2022, 71
  • [49] Biomarkers for cardiovascular risk in children
    Canas, Jose A.
    Sweeten, Shawn
    Balagopal, Prabhakaran
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 28 (02) : 103 - 114
  • [50] Multiple biomarkers and cardiovascular risk
    Austin, Mark J.
    Heneghan, Michael A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 359 (07): : 760 - 761