Finite-element and simplified models of GFRP connections
被引:0
|
作者:
Smith, S.J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Exponent Failure Anal. Assoc., Two North Riverside Plaza, Ste. 1400, Chicago, IL 60606, United StatesExponent Failure Anal. Assoc., Two North Riverside Plaza, Ste. 1400, Chicago, IL 60606, United States
Smith, S.J.
[1
]
Parsons, I.D.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Exponent Failure Anal. Assoc., Two North Riverside Plaza, Ste. 1400, Chicago, IL 60606, United StatesExponent Failure Anal. Assoc., Two North Riverside Plaza, Ste. 1400, Chicago, IL 60606, United States
Parsons, I.D.
[1
]
Hjelmstad, K.D.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Exponent Failure Anal. Assoc., Two North Riverside Plaza, Ste. 1400, Chicago, IL 60606, United StatesExponent Failure Anal. Assoc., Two North Riverside Plaza, Ste. 1400, Chicago, IL 60606, United States
Hjelmstad, K.D.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Exponent Failure Anal. Assoc., Two North Riverside Plaza, Ste. 1400, Chicago, IL 60606, United States
Finite-element models of a variety of joints between glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) pultruded members are described that reproduce experimentally measured linear elastic stiffnesses to within 10%. The models were constructed using shell finite elements. The material properties of the pultrusions were measured using a combination of tests and fits to numerical models. This approach produced elastic constants that proved reliable in the subsequent finite-element modeling of the joints. Standard data provided by the manufacturer gave inaccurate predictions of the joint stiffness. Two types of simplified models were also considered: (1) simplified beam models; and (2) a condensed finite element model. The simplified beam models replace the joint with an elastic connection region and a torsional spring. The condensed finite-element models use a detailed shell element model of the joint to extract the equivalent stiffnesses of the joint that can be used with a standard frame analysis package. When compared with experimental data, the simplified beam models performed poorly. However, the condensed finite-element models performed almost as well as the detailed finite models.