Finite Difference Simulation of Geologically Complex Reservoirs with Tensor Permeabilities

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, S.H.
Durlofsky, L.J.
Lough, M.F.
Chen, W.H.
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The gridblock permeabilities used in reservoir simulation are commonly determined through the upscaling of a fine scale geostatistical reservoir description. Though it is well established that permeabilities computed in this manner are, in general, full tensor quantities, most finite difference reservoir simulators still treat permeability as a diagonal tensor. In this paper, we implement a capability to handle full tensor permeabilities in a general purpose finite difference simulator and apply this capability to the modeling of several complex geological systems. We formulate a flux continuous approach for the pressure equation by use of a method analogous to that of previous researchers (Edwards and Rogers1; Aavatsmark et al.2), consider methods for upwinding in multiphase flow problems, and additionally discuss some relevant implementation and reservoir characterization issues. The accuracy of the finite difference formulation, assessed through comparisons to an accurate finite element approach, is shown to be generally good, particularly for immiscible displacements in heterogeneous systems. The formulation is then applied to the simulation of upscaled descriptions of several geologically complex reservoirs involving crossbedding and extensive fracturing. The method performs quite well for these systems and is shown to capture the effects of the underlying geology accurately. Finally, the significant errors that can be incurred through inaccurate representation of the full permeability tensor are demonstrated for several cases.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 574
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A finite difference model for air pollution simulation
    Sanin, N.
    Montero, G.
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2007, 38 (06) : 358 - 365
  • [32] Quantum finite difference solvers for physics simulation
    Chagneau, Anthony
    Nathoo, Laeticia
    Alloul, Jeremy
    Gabriel, Bertrand
    IET QUANTUM COMMUNICATION, 2023, 4 (02): : 70 - 83
  • [33] FINITE-DIFFERENCE SIMULATION OF BREAKING WAVES
    MIYATA, H
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1986, 65 (01) : 179 - 214
  • [34] Finite difference simulation of cylindrical cavity expansion
    Pyrah, IC
    Anderson, WF
    Hashim, R
    NUMERICAL MODELS IN GEOMECHANICS - NUMOG VI, 1997, : 661 - 668
  • [35] The Complex-Step-Finite-Difference method
    Abreu, Rafael
    Stich, Daniel
    Morales, Jose
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 202 (01) : 72 - 93
  • [36] Simulation of a fluid influx in complex reservoirs of Western Siberia
    Penkov, G. M.
    Karmansky, D. A.
    Petrakov, D. G.
    TOPICAL ISSUES OF RATIONAL USE OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2019, : 119 - 124
  • [37] A novel streamline simulation method for fractured reservoirs with full-tensor permeability
    Rao, Xiang
    He, Xupeng
    Kwak, Hyung
    Hoteit, Hussein
    Yousef, Ali
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2024, 36 (01)
  • [38] Simulation of Dynamic Earthquake Ruptures in Complex Geometries Using High-Order Finite Difference Methods
    Jeremy E. Kozdon
    Eric M. Dunham
    Jan Nordström
    Journal of Scientific Computing, 2013, 55 : 92 - 124
  • [39] Finite difference time domain method forward simulation of complex geoelectricity ground penetrating radar model
    Dai, QW
    Feng, DS
    He, JS
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 12 (04): : 478 - 482
  • [40] Complex Permittivity and Permeability Measurements and Finite-Difference Time-Domain Simulation of Ferrite Materials
    Xu, Jianfeng
    Koledintseva, Marina Y.
    Zhang, Yaojiang
    He, Yongxue
    Matlin, Bill
    DuBroff, Richard E.
    Drewniak, James L.
    Zhang, Jianmin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, 2010, 52 (04) : 878 - 887