Comparison of data selection methods for modeling chemical processes with artificial neural networks

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] Zapf, Fabian
[2] Wallek, Thomas
来源
Wallek, Thomas (thomas.wallek@tugraz.at) | 1600年 / Elsevier Ltd卷 / 113期
关键词
Feature Selection - Data reduction - Computational geometry - Conformal mapping;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Instance selection aims at selecting model training data in a way that the performance of the trained models is maximized. In the context of modeling chemical processes by artificial neural networks, it can serve as an essential preprocessing step since measurement data of such processes are commonly highly clustered and thus far away from being ideally normally distributed. In this paper, four filter methods from literature and a newly proposed method for data selection are tested and combined with a convex hull data selection algorithm, which results in ten different selection approaches. These approaches are applied to five selected datasets by training feed-forward artificial neural networks with the produced split datasets. The final mean model deviation is used to quantify the algorithms’ performance and their standard deviation to provide information about their reproducibility. It is found that the convex hull extended algorithms self-organizing maps based stratified sampling with a proportional allocation rule and the newly proposed self-information-based subset selection perform best for real-world chemical engineering data. © 2021 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Data Selection in Neural Networks
    Ferreira, Jonathas O.
    Mendonca, Marcele O. K.
    Diniz, Paulo S. R.
    IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2021, 2 : 522 - 534
  • [42] A benchmarking approach for comparing data splitting methods for modeling water resources parameters using artificial neural networks
    Wu, Wenyan
    May, Robert J.
    Maier, Holger R.
    Dandy, Graeme C.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (11) : 7598 - 7614
  • [43] Comparison of Predictions between Artificial Neural Networks and Gaussian Processes in EMC Investigations
    Burghardt, Felix
    Garbe, Heyno
    2019 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY (EMC EUROPE 2019), 2019, : 921 - 926
  • [44] Statistical Methods and Artificial Neural Networks
    Mammadov, Mammadagha
    Yazici, Berna
    Yolacan, Senay
    Aslanargun, Atilla
    Yuzer, Ali Fuat
    Agaoglu, Embiya
    JOURNAL OF MODERN APPLIED STATISTICAL METHODS, 2006, 5 (02) : 495 - 512
  • [45] Modeling the Chemical Composition of Ferritic Stainless Steels with the Use of Artificial Neural Networks
    Honysz, Rafal
    METALS, 2021, 11 (05)
  • [46] COMPARTMENTAL MODELING WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS
    COOMBER, CJ
    NEURAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 1995, 2 (01) : 13 - 18
  • [47] Analysing customer satisfaction data: a comparison of regression and artificial neural networks
    Gronholdt, L
    Martensen, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2005, 47 (02) : 121 - 130
  • [48] A Ranking Approach for Probe Selection and Classification of Microarray Data with Artificial Neural Networks
    Chagas Faria, Alexandre Wagner
    Da Silva, Alisson Marques
    Rodrigues, Thiago de Souza
    Costa, Marcelo Azevedo
    Braga, Antonio Padua
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (10) : 953 - 961
  • [49] Artificial Neural Networks and Ranking Approach for Probe Selection and Classification of Microarray Data
    Silva, Alisson Marques
    Faria, Alexandre Wagner C.
    Rodrigues, Thiago de Souza
    Costa, Marcelo Azevedo
    Braga, Antonio de Padua
    2013 1ST BRICS COUNTRIES CONGRESS ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND 11TH BRAZILIAN CONGRESS ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (BRICS-CCI & CBIC), 2013, : 598 - 603
  • [50] Using Artificial Neural Networks and System Identification Methods for Electricity Price Modeling
    Jamshidi, Mohammad
    Siahkamari, Hesam
    Jamshidi, Morteza
    2017 3RD IRANIAN CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (ICSPIS), 2017, : 43 - 47