Financial risk assessment methodology for natural hazards

被引:0
|
作者
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand [1 ]
机构
来源
Bull. NZ Soc. Earthquake Eng. | 2006年 / 2卷 / 91-105期
关键词
Decision making - Highway bridges - Industrial management - Probability - Risk assessment - Safety factor;
D O I
10.5459/bnzsee.39.2.91-105
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Engineered facilities are deemed safe if they have little or no probability of incurring damage when subjected to regular actions or natural hazards. Any probability of the performance of any designed system (i.e. capacity) not being able to meet the performance required of it (i.e. demand) results in risk, which might be expressed either as a likelihood of damage or potential financial loss. Engineers are used to dealing with the former (i.e. damage), which gives a fair indication of repair/strengthening work needed to bring the system back to full functionality. Nevertheless, other non-technical stakeholders (such as owners, insurers, decision-makers) of the designed facilities cannot read too much from damage. Hence, risk, if interpreted in terms of damage only, will not be comprehended by all stakeholders. On the other hand, financial risk expressed in terms of probable dollar loss in easily understood by all. Therefore, there is an impetus on developing methodologies which correlate the system capacity and demand to financial risk. This paper builds on the existing probabilistic risk assessment methodology and extends it to estimate expected annual financial loss. The general methodology formulated in this paper is applicable to any engineered facilities and any natural hazard. To clarify the process, the proposed methodology is applied to assess overall financial risk of a highway bridge pier due to seismic hazard.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Financial risk assessment in shipping: a holistic machine learning based methodology
    Mark Clintworth
    Dimitrios Lyridis
    Evangelos Boulougouris
    Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2023, 25 : 90 - 121
  • [42] Financial risk assessment in shipping: a holistic machine learning based methodology
    Clintworth, Mark
    Lyridis, Dimitrios
    Boulougouris, Evangelos
    MARITIME ECONOMICS & LOGISTICS, 2023, 25 (01) : 90 - 121
  • [43] A critical evaluation of risk assessment methodology for natural gas pipeline
    Kraus, J.
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY: METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, : 43 - 47
  • [44] Remote Sensing-Based Methodology for the Quick Update of the Assessment of the Population Exposed to Natural Hazards
    Boni, Giorgio
    De Angeli, Silvia
    Taramasso, Angela Celeste
    Roth, Giorgio
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (23) : 1 - 18
  • [45] A quantitative risk assessment and risk management methodology for natural terrain in Hong Kong
    Roberds, WJ
    Ho, K
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION & ASSESSMENT, 1997, : 207 - 218
  • [46] A look beyond climate risk exposure: the impact of incapacity to cope with natural hazards on financial development
    Canh Phuc Nguyen
    Nguyen Duc Nguyen
    Jeff Wongchoti
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 58058 - 58076
  • [47] A look beyond climate risk exposure: the impact of incapacity to cope with natural hazards on financial development
    Nguyen, Canh Phuc
    Nguyen, Nguyen Duc
    Wongchoti, Jeff
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (20) : 58058 - 58076
  • [48] Special issue: Probabilistic assessment of risk from natural hazards at global scale
    Di Mauro, Manuela
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2014, 10 : 403 - 405
  • [49] Estimating health risks from natural hazards using risk assessment and epidemiology
    Malilay, J
    Henderson, A
    McGeehin, M
    Flanders, WD
    RISK ANALYSIS, 1997, 17 (03) : 353 - 358
  • [50] Estimating health risks from natural hazards using risk assessment and epidemiology
    Disaster Assess. Epidemiol. Sect., Natl. Ctr. for Environmental Health, Centers for Dis. Contr. and Prev., Atlanta, GA, United States
    不详
    不详
    不详
    不详
    RISK ANAL., 3 (353-358):