Financial risk assessment methodology for natural hazards

被引:0
|
作者
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand [1 ]
机构
来源
Bull. NZ Soc. Earthquake Eng. | 2006年 / 2卷 / 91-105期
关键词
Decision making - Highway bridges - Industrial management - Probability - Risk assessment - Safety factor;
D O I
10.5459/bnzsee.39.2.91-105
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Engineered facilities are deemed safe if they have little or no probability of incurring damage when subjected to regular actions or natural hazards. Any probability of the performance of any designed system (i.e. capacity) not being able to meet the performance required of it (i.e. demand) results in risk, which might be expressed either as a likelihood of damage or potential financial loss. Engineers are used to dealing with the former (i.e. damage), which gives a fair indication of repair/strengthening work needed to bring the system back to full functionality. Nevertheless, other non-technical stakeholders (such as owners, insurers, decision-makers) of the designed facilities cannot read too much from damage. Hence, risk, if interpreted in terms of damage only, will not be comprehended by all stakeholders. On the other hand, financial risk expressed in terms of probable dollar loss in easily understood by all. Therefore, there is an impetus on developing methodologies which correlate the system capacity and demand to financial risk. This paper builds on the existing probabilistic risk assessment methodology and extends it to estimate expected annual financial loss. The general methodology formulated in this paper is applicable to any engineered facilities and any natural hazard. To clarify the process, the proposed methodology is applied to assess overall financial risk of a highway bridge pier due to seismic hazard.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FINANCIAL RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR NATURAL HAZARDS
    Dhakal, Rajesh P.
    Mander, John B.
    BULLETIN OF THE NEW ZEALAND SOCIETY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2006, 39 (02): : 91 - 105
  • [2] Mitigation and financial risk management for natural hazards
    Kunreuther, H
    GENEVA PAPERS ON RISK AND INSURANCE-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2001, 26 (02): : 277 - 296
  • [3] Mitigation and Financial Risk Management for Natural Hazards
    Howard Kunreuther
    The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 2001, 26 : 277 - 296
  • [4] Quantitative risk assessment of natural hazards in mining based on the EN61508 methodology
    Lebecki, K.
    Rosmus, P.
    RISK, RELIABILITY AND SOCIETAL SAFETY, VOLS 1-3: VOL 1: SPECIALISATION TOPICS; VOL 2: THEMATIC TOPICS; VOL 3: APPLICATIONS TOPICS, 2007, : 1231 - 1236
  • [5] Retrospective assessment of risk from natural hazards
    Velasquez, C. A.
    Cardona, O. D.
    Carreno, M. L.
    Barbat, A. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2014, 10 : 477 - 489
  • [6] Fuzzy risk assessment of urban natural hazards
    Huang, CF
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1996, 83 (02) : 271 - 282
  • [7] Methodology of natural risk assessment in Russia
    Osipov, V. I.
    Larionov, V. I.
    Burova, V. N.
    Frolova, N. I.
    Sushchev, S. P.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2017, 88 : 17 - 41
  • [8] Methodology of natural risk assessment in Russia
    V. I. Osipov
    V. I. Larionov
    V. N. Burova
    N. I. Frolova
    S. P. Sushchev
    Natural Hazards, 2017, 88 : 17 - 41
  • [9] Multiple Risk Assessment for Various Natural Hazards for Georgia
    Chelidze, T.
    Tsereteli, N.
    Tsereteli, E.
    Kaldani, L.
    Dolidze, J.
    Varazanashvili, O.
    Svanadze, D.
    OPTIMISATION OF DISASTER FORECASTING AND PREVENTION MEASURES IN THE CONTEXT OF HUMAN AND SOCIAL DYNAMICS, 2009, 52 : 11 - 22
  • [10] Natural hazards and technological risk in Russia: the relation assessment
    Petrova, E
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2005, 5 (04) : 459 - 464