Blood trauma testing for mechanical circulatory support devices

被引:9
|
作者
Giridharan G.A. [1 ]
Sobieski M.A. [2 ]
Ising M. [3 ]
Slaughter M.S. [2 ]
Koenig S.C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
[2] Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville
[3] Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Louisville
[4] Departments of Bioenginering and Surgery, University of Louisville
来源
关键词
Safety testing - Blood - Materials testing;
D O I
10.2345/0899-8205-45.4.334
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Preclinical hemolysis testing is a critical requirement toward demonstrating device safety for U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) approval of mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSD). FDA and ASTM (formerly known as the American Society for Testing and Materials) have published guidelines to assist industry with developing study protocols. However, there can be significant variability in experimental procedures, study design, and reporting of data that makes comparison of test and predicate devices a challenge. To overcome these limitations, we present a hemolysis testing protocol developed to enable standardization of hemolysis testing while adhering to FDA and ASTM guidelines. Static mock flow loops primed with fresh bovine blood (600 mL, Hematocrit = 27±5%, heparin titrated for ACT >300 sec) from a single-source donor were created as a platform for investigating test and predicate devices. MCSD differential pressure and temperature were maintained at 80 mmHg and 25°±2° C. Blood samples (3 ml) were collected at 0, 5, 90, 180, 270, 360 minutes to measure CBC and plasma free hemoglobin. This protocol led to 510(k) approval of two adult MCSD and has been used to test novel cannulae and a pediatric MCSD. Standardization of hemolysis testing procedures and transparency of results may enable better blood trauma characterization of MCS devices to facilitate the FDA 510(k) and PMA submission processes and improve clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 339
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock
    Mandawat, Aditya
    Rao, Sunil V.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (05)
  • [32] Blood pressure management in mechanical circulatory support
    Bennett, Mosi K.
    Adatya, Sirtaz
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2015, 7 (12) : 2125 - 2128
  • [33] Viscoelastic Testing in the Management of Adult Patients on Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices with Focus on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
    Volod, Oksana
    Wegner, Julie
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2022, 48 (07): : 814 - 827
  • [34] MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT DEVICES IN PATIENTS WITH NONISCHEMIC CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
    Veerabattini, Naresh
    Patlolla, Sri Harsha
    Arteaga, Cristopher
    Cheetirala, Sivaramakrishna
    Kandlakunta, Sriharsha
    Kuchkuntla, Aravind R.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52
  • [35] Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock: State of the Art
    Hajjar, Ludhmila Abrahao
    Teboul, Jean-Louis
    CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 23 (1)
  • [36] Novel percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices and their expanding applications
    Spratt, John R.
    Raveendran, Ganesh
    Liao, Kenneth
    John, Ranjit
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2016, 14 (10) : 1133 - 1150
  • [37] MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT DEVICES FOR THE CORONARY-CARE UNIT
    FIGULLA, HR
    SCHOLZ, KH
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 1994, 83 : 97 - 109
  • [38] Mechanical circulatory support devices in adults with congenital heart disease
    Garba, Deen L.
    Joseph, Susan
    Cedars, Ari
    CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 29 (05) : 310 - 315
  • [39] Advanced Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock
    Miller, P. Elliott
    Solomon, Michael A.
    McAreavey, Dorothea
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (11) : 1922 - 1929
  • [40] Development of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices: 55 Years and Counting
    Petersen, Emalie
    AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 32 (04) : 424 - 433