Sustainability assessment of blue hydrogen production through biomass gasification: A comparative analysis of thermal, solar, and wind energy sources

被引:1
|
作者
Ayub, Yousaf [1 ]
Zhou, Jianzhao [1 ]
Shi, Tao [2 ]
Toniolo, Sara [3 ]
Ren, Jingzheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Res Inst Adv Mfg, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Verona, Dept Management, Verona, Italy
关键词
Carbon neutrality; Sustainability; 3E analysis; Blue hydrogen; Biomass gasification; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131798
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
This study evaluated three blue hydrogen production processes - solar-grid powered, wind-powered, and thermal power grid (TPG) - considering the context of Hong Kong, SAR, China. A process sustainability analysis was performed based on energy, economic, and environmental (3E) factors. The energy efficiency analysis indicates that the TPG system is the most energy-efficient with 64% efficiency, followed by the wind power system at 63% and the hybrid solar-grid powered system at 60%. The economic analysis results indicate that the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCH) is 2.165 $/kg for the TPG system, 2.132 $/kg for the hybrid solar-grid powered system, and 2.060 $/kg for the wind power system. The environmental assessment suggests that wind powered are eco-friendly with a unit point total (mu Pt) of 1.11, compared to the solar-grid 1.50 mu Pt and TPG system's 1.70 mu Pt. Therefore, 3E analysis proposes wind powered process is more sustainable for blue H2 production.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sustainability assessment of catalysis for energy storage in hydrogen: Comparative net energy analysis of fuel cell and electrolyzer technologies
    Pellow, Matthew
    Sridhar, Smriti
    Emmott, Christopher
    Benson, Sally
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 249
  • [42] Comparative Analysis Between Solar And Wind Turbine Energy Sources In IoT Based On Economical And Efficiency Considerations
    Mohammed, Nada Qasim
    Ahmed, Mohammed Swish
    Mohammed, Mostafa Abdulghafoor
    Hammood, Omar A.
    Alshara, Hayder Ali Nema
    Kamil, Aya Ahkam
    2019 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE (CSCS), 2019, : 448 - 452
  • [43] Hydrogen production through two-stage sorption-enhanced biomass gasification: process design and thermodynamic analysis
    Dziva, Godknows
    Cheng, Qifan
    Liu, Kunlei
    Zeng, Liang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (98) : 38602 - 38616
  • [46] Wind resource assessment and techno-economic analysis of wind energy and green hydrogen production in the Republic of Djibouti
    Dabar, Omar Assowe
    Awaleh, Mohamed Osman
    Waberi, Moussa Mohamed
    Adan, Abdi-Basid Ibrahim
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 8996 - 9016
  • [47] An iterative comprehensive evaluation of pretreatment methods, comparative biomass analysis, and sustainability assessment for optimizing anaerobic biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass
    Miskin, Vaishnavi S.
    Hinge, Ganesh A.
    INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, 2024, 9 (05)
  • [48] Cost of solar and wind electricity made dispatchable through hydrogen, thermal, and battery energy storage in NEOM City
    Boretti A.
    Castelletto S.
    International Journal of Energy and Water Resources, 2023, 7 (3) : 309 - 326
  • [49] Assessment of offloading pathways for wind-powered offshore hydrogen production: Energy and economic analysis
    Franco, Brais Armino
    Baptista, Patricia
    Neto, Rui Costa
    Ganilha, Sofia
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 286
  • [50] Comparative techno-economic analysis of biofuel production through gasification, thermal liquefaction and pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse
    Ramirez, Jerome A.
    Rainey, Thomas J.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 229 : 513 - 527