Implications of Pulse Frequency in Terrestrial Laser Scanning on Forest Point Cloud Quality and Individual Tree Structural Metrics

被引:0
|
作者
Verhelst, Tom E. [1 ]
Calders, Kim [1 ]
Burt, Andrew [2 ]
Demol, Miro [2 ]
D'hont, Barbara [1 ]
Nightingale, Joanne [3 ]
Terryn, Louise [1 ]
Verbeeck, Hans [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Environm, Q ForestLab Lab Quantitat Forest Ecosyst Sci, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Sylvera Ltd, London EC1V 8BT, England
[3] Natl Phys Lab, Climate & Earth Observat Grp, Hampton Rd, Teddington TW11 0LW, England
基金
“创新英国”项目;
关键词
terrestrial laser scanning; pulse repetition rate; point clouds; BIOMASS; MODELS;
D O I
10.3390/rs16234560
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) provides highly detailed 3D information of forest environments but is limited to small spatial scales, as data collection is time consuming compared to other remote sensing techniques. Furthermore, TLS data collection is heavily dependent on wind conditions, as the movement of trees negatively impacts the acquired data. Hardware advancements resulting in faster data acquisition times have the potential to be valuable in upscaling efforts but might impact overall data quality. In this study, we investigated the impact of the pulse repetition rate (PRR), or pulse frequency, which is the number of laser pulses emitted per second by the scanner. Increasing the PRR reduces the scan time required for a single scan but decreases the power (amplitude) of the emitted laser pulses commensurately. This trade-off could potentially impact the quality of the acquired data. We used a RIEGL VZ400i laser scanner to test the impact of different PRR settings on the point cloud quality and derived tree structural metrics from individual tree point clouds (diameter, tree height, crown projected area) as well as quantitative structure models (total branch length, tree volume). We investigated this impact across five field plots of different forest complexity and canopy density for three different PRR settings (300, 600 and 1200 kHz). The scan time for a single scan was 180, 90 and 45 s for 300, 600 and 1200 kHz, respectively. Differences among the raw acquired scans from different PRR replicates were largely removed by several necessary data processing steps, notably the removal of uncertain points with a low reflectance attribute. We found strong agreement between the individual tree structural metrics derived from each of the PRR replicates, independent of the forest complexity. This was the case for both point cloud-based metrics and those derived from quantitative structural models (QSMs). The results demonstrate that the PRR in high-end TLS instruments can be increased for data collection with negligible impact on a selection of derived structural metrics that are commonly used in the context of aboveground biomass estimation.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Automatic extraction of individual tree branch structure parameters from terrestrial laser scanning data
    Liu J.
    Zhang H.
    Liu M.
    Li Y.
    Linye Kexue/Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52 (03): : 121 - 128
  • [42] Measuring the Contribution of Leaves to the Structural Complexity of Urban Tree Crowns with Terrestrial Laser Scanning
    Arseniou, Georgios
    MacFarlane, David W.
    Seidel, Dominik
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [43] Derivation of tree stem structural parameters from static terrestrial laser scanning data
    Wei, Tian
    Lin, Yi
    Liu, Yajing
    Niu, Zheng
    LIDAR REMOTE SENSING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING XIV, 2014, 9262
  • [44] Tree species classification using structural features derived from terrestrial laser scanning
    Terryn, Louise
    Calders, Kim
    Disney, Mathias
    Origo, Niall
    Malhi, Yadvinder
    Newnham, Glenn
    Raumonen, Pasi
    Akerblom, Markku
    Verbeeck, Hans
    ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 168 : 170 - 181
  • [45] Assessing Metrics for Estimating Fire Induced Change in the Forest Understorey Structure Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning
    Gupta, Vaibhav
    Reinke, Karin J.
    Jones, Simon D.
    Wallace, Luke
    Holden, Lucas
    REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 7 (06) : 8180 - 8201
  • [46] Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Forest Inventories Tree Diameter Distribution and Scanner Location Impact on Occlusion
    Abegg, Meinrad
    Kuekenbrink, Daniel
    Zell, Juergen
    Schaepman, Michael E.
    Morsdorf, Felix
    FORESTS, 2017, 8 (06):
  • [47] Constrained Spectral Clustering of Individual Trees in Dense Forest Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data
    Heinzel, Johannes
    Huber, Markus O.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (07):
  • [48] Assessing the structural differences between tropical forest types using Terrestrial Laser Scanning
    Decuyper, Mathieu
    Mulatu, Kalkidan Ayele
    Brede, Benjamin
    Calders, Kim
    Armston, John
    Rozendaal, Danae M. A.
    Mora, Brice
    Clevers, Jan G. P. W.
    Kooistra, Lammert
    Herold, Martin
    Bongers, Frans
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 429 : 327 - 335
  • [49] Retrieval of Forest Structural Parameters from Terrestrial Laser Scanning: A Romanian Case Study
    Pascu, Ionut-Silviu
    Dobre, Alexandru-Claudiu
    Badea, Ovidiu
    Tanase, Mihai Andrei
    FORESTS, 2020, 11 (04):
  • [50] Shifts in structural diversity of Amazonian forest edges detected using terrestrial laser scanning
    Maeda, Eduardo Eiji
    Nunes, Matheus Henrique
    Calders, Kim
    de Moura, Yhasmin Mendes
    Raumonen, Pasi
    Tuomisto, Hanna
    Verley, Philippe
    Vincent, Gregoire
    Zuquim, Gabriela
    Camargo, Jose Luis
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 271