Simulation of nonpoint source pollution load in Maoping River watershed

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Qi-Gong
Liu, Hong-Liang
Shen, Zhen-Yao
Mao, Ya-Ming
机构
[1] School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
[2] Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Science, Beijing 100012, China
[3] Environment Monitoring Centre of China National Petroleum Corporation, Langfang 065007, China
来源
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2006年 / 27卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The nitrogen and phosphorous transport in the Maoping River watershed was modeled using the SWAT model, which simulates the water cycle and the transformation of nutrients. The model was first calibrated by comparing the observed and the simulated data from May to October 2004, and then validated. The Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (R2), the mean square root error (RMSE) and the relative error (CV) were used to test the agreement between observed and simulated data. The validated model was then be used to simulate the nutrients load in Maoping River watershed. The Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient of flow, nitrogen and phosphorous was 0.71, 0.51 and 0.62 with the minimum relative error 1.8%, 1.1% and 10% respectively. Despite achieving the relatively lower resemblance between observed and simulated phosphorous and nitrogen load the model showed good agreement in simulating runoff. The results showed that 102.5 t nitrogen and 9.46 t phosphorous entered into Yangtze River during May to October 2004. One of the important reason that caused the water quality deterioration can be attributed to the nonpoint source pollution.
引用
收藏
页码:2176 / 2181
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nonpoint source pollution
    Gang, D.D. (Gang@louisiana.edu), 1715, Water Environment Federation (85):
  • [22] Analysis of nonpoint source pollution load in Ulansuhai Nur basin
    Jiya Nuen
    Shanshan Li
    Le Cheng
    Lee Swan
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2020, 13
  • [23] Nonpoint source pollution
    Lin, Lu
    Deng, Zhi-Qiang
    Gang, Daniel Dianchen
    Water Environment Research, 2009, 81 (10) : 1996 - 2018
  • [24] NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION
    ALM, AL
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 25 (08) : 1369 - 1369
  • [25] Nonpoint source pollution
    Islam F.
    Lian Q.
    Ahmad Z.U.
    Zappi M.E.
    Yao L.
    Gang D.D.
    Water Environment Research, 2018, 90 (10) : 1872 - 1898
  • [26] Risk Assessment of Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Huaihe River Basin
    Zhao, Huiling
    Zheng, Jiaxiao
    Zhu, Yuke
    Li, Luyi
    Cai, Xitian
    WATER, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [27] Agricultural phosphorus nonpoint source pollution in the Minnesota River.
    Westra, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 81 (05) : 1293 - 1293
  • [28] NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION
    ISCHINGER, LS
    FISHERIES, 1979, 4 (02) : 50 - 52
  • [29] THE SIMULATION OF AGRICULTURAL NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION IN SHUANGYANG RIVER WATERSHED
    Ma, Yongsheng
    Tan, Xiucui
    Shi, Qiuyue
    COMPUTER AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES IN AGRICULTURE II, VOL 1, 2009, 293 : 553 - +
  • [30] Characterization of the nonpoint source pollution into river at different spatial scales
    Wang, Kang
    Lin, Zhongbing
    WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 32 (03) : 453 - 465