Three-way decision-based label integration for crowdsourcing

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Can [1 ]
Jiang, Liangxiao [1 ]
Li, Chaoqun [2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Comp Sci, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Sch Math & Phys, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Crowdsourcing; Label integration; Three-way decision; IMPROVING DATA; MODEL QUALITY; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.patcog.2024.111034
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In crowdsourcing learning, label integration is often used to infer instances' integrated labels from their multiple noisy labels. However, almost all existing label integration algorithms apply the same strategy to infer different instances' integrated labels, which limits their performance. This paper argues that different instances should enjoy different label integration strategies alone. Thanks to the three-way decision theory, a three-way decision-based label integration (TDLI) algorithm is proposed. In TDLI, we at first evaluate the label qualities of each instance and its K-nearest neighbors, and then utilize them to divide the whole crowdsourced datasets into three disjoint subsets, called positive set, boundary set and negative set, respectively. For each instance in the positive set, we directly apply the simplest majority voting (MV) to infer its integrated label. For each instance in the boundary set, we absorb its K-nearest neighbors' multiple noisy labels to infer its integrated label by the weighted MV. For each instance in the negative set, we merge the positive and boundary sets to train a classifier to infer its integrated label by fusing its own multiple noisy label distribution and the predicted label distribution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TDLI distinctly outperforms all the other existing label integration algorithms used to compare.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Three-way decision on two universes
    Li, Xiaonan
    Sun, Qianqian
    Chen, Hongmei
    Yi, Huangjian
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 515 : 263 - 279
  • [32] Three-way decision and granular computing
    Yao, Yiyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2018, 103 : 107 - 123
  • [33] Three-way decision on information tables
    Li, Xiaonan
    Wang, Xuan
    Sun, Bingzhen
    She, Yanhong
    Zhao, Lu
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 545 : 25 - 43
  • [34] A Large Scale Group Three-Way Decision-based consensus model for site selection of New Energy Vehicle charging stations
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    He, Shi-Fan
    Zamora, Diego Garcia
    Pan, Xiao-Hong
    Martinez, Luis
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2023, 214
  • [35] Selective label enhancement for multi-label classification based on three-way decisions
    Zhao, Tianna
    Zhang, Yuanjian
    Miao, Duoqian
    Pedrycz, Witold
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2022, 150 : 172 - 187
  • [36] A three-way decision model based on cumulative prospect theory
    Wang, Tianxing
    Li, Huaxiong
    Zhang, Libo
    Zhou, Xianzhong
    Huang, Bing
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 519 (519) : 74 - 92
  • [37] A novel granular computing model based on three-way decision
    Kong, Qingzhao
    Zhang, Xiawei
    Xu, Weihua
    Long, Binghan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2022, 144 : 92 - 112
  • [38] ACTIVE LEARNING OF THREE-WAY DECISION BASED ON NEIGHBORHOOD ENTROPY
    Lv, Qiuyue
    Dong, Minggang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2022, 18 (02): : 377 - 393
  • [39] A general conflict analysis model based on three-way decision
    Guangming Lang
    International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2020, 11 : 1083 - 1094
  • [40] Effectiveness measure in change-based three-way decision
    Jiang, Chunmao
    Duan, Ying
    Guo, Doudou
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 27 (06) : 2783 - 2793