Future runoff trends in the mang river basin of China: Implications of carbon emission paths

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Tingsheng [1 ]
Han, Zhen [1 ]
Fang, Fayong [1 ]
Yu, Wanyang [1 ]
Fang, Qian [1 ]
Zi, Ruyi [1 ]
Zhao, Longshan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Univ, Coll Forestry, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Forestry, Res Inst Forestry, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Climate change; Carbon emissions; SWAT; Runoff prediction; Mang River basin; CLIMATE-CHANGE; IMPACTS; TEMPERATURE; DISCHARGE; QUALITY; PATTERN; CMIP5;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123843
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, the rapid development of the global economy has led to an increasing impact of the ongoing climate warming phenomenon on the hydrological cycle. In this context, the runoff changes affected by human activities are more severe. This study classifies climate scenarios based on carbon emission levels into "low-carbon" (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5) and "high-carbon" (SSP3-7.0, SSP5-8.5) dual carbon development paths, and analyzes the evolution characteristics of runoff in the Mang River Basin in the near future (2021-2060) and far future (2061-2100) through driving the SWAT model. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) The suitability of the SWAT model in the Mang River Basin was confirmed with a high accuracy (R-2 > 0.65, NSE > 0.8), and the parameters ESCO and SOL_AWC were found to have a high sensitivity to runoff. (2) Increased precipitation fluctuation and continuous temperature rise will be the climate change trend in the basin under the dual carbon pathway. It is estimated that by the end of the 21st century, the overall highest temperature will increase by 1.37-5.02 degrees C, with temperature increases of 0.53-0.63 degrees C/10a and 0.17-0.38 degrees C/10a under the "high carbon" and "low carbon" pathways, respectively. Furthermore, the far future precipitation levels are expected to be higher than near future levels across various climate scenarios, with this trend being especially significant under the "low-carbon" pathway. (3) With the influence of climate change, there is a larger increase in runoff volume under the "high-carbon" pathway, with the growth rate of SSP5-8.5 being the fastest at 0.099 m(3)/s<middle dot>a, resulting in an overall runoff change of 30.65%. On the other hand, the runoff volume under the "low-carbon" pathway shows a slow growth trend, with an increasing rate that accelerates after the mid-21st century. The runoff change rates range from 0.046 to 0.079 m(3)/s<middle dot>a. (4) Climate change will significantly alter the overall runoff conditions of the basin. With the passage of time and the increase of carbon concentration emission, the impact of temperature on basin runoff will become increasingly stronger. However, precipitation was still the dominant factor leading to changes in runoff. The overall climate environment within the basin will shift towards a warmer and wetter direction. This research will help in the future to adopt appropriate measures for soil and water conservation and ecological protection strategies in ecologically vulnerable areas affected by human activities and located in different geographical basins under the background of climate change.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spatiotemporal evolution of urban carbon emission performance in China and prediction of future trends
    Shaojian Wang
    Shuang Gao
    Yongyuan Huang
    Chenyi Shi
    Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30 : 757 - 774
  • [32] Spatiotemporal evolution of urban carbon emission performance in China and prediction of future trends
    WANG Shaojian
    GAO Shuang
    HUANG Yongyuan
    SHI Chenyi
    Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30 (05) : 757 - 774
  • [33] Glacier runoff variation and its influence on river runoff during 1961–2006 in the Tarim River Basin, China
    Xin Gao
    BaiSheng Ye
    ShiQiang Zhang
    ChengJun Qiao
    XiaoWen Zhang
    Science China Earth Sciences, 2010, 53 : 880 - 891
  • [34] Glacier runoff variation and its influence on river runoff during 1961–2006 in the Tarim River Basin, China
    GAO Xin1
    2 Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute
    3 The Resource Environment and Urban and Rural Planning Department
    ScienceChina(EarthSciences), 2010, 53 (06) : 880 - 891
  • [35] Future changes in annual runoff and hydroclimatic extremes in the upper River Basin
    Wang, Taihua
    Shi, Ruijie
    Yang, Dawen
    Yang, Shuyu
    Fang, Beijing
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2022, 615
  • [36] Erosion-induced massive organic carbon burial and carbon emission in the Yellow River basin, China
    Ran, L.
    Lu, X. X.
    Xin, Z.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2014, 11 (04) : 945 - 959
  • [37] Prediction of Future Spatial and Temporal Evolution Trends of Reference Evapotranspiration in the Yellow River Basin, China
    Jian, Shengqi
    Wang, Aoxue
    Su, Chengguo
    Wang, Kun
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [38] Long-Term Rainfall Trends and Future Projections over Xijiang River Basin, China
    Touseef, Muhammad
    Chen, Lihua
    Yang, Kaipeng
    Chen, Yunyao
    ADVANCES IN METEOROLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [39] Identify the influencing paths of precipitation and soil water storage on runoff: an example from Xinjiang River Basin, Poyang Lake, China
    Fan, Hongxiang
    Xu, Ligang
    Wang, Xiaolong
    Wu, Yuexia
    Jiang, Jiahu
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-WATER SUPPLY, 2018, 18 (05): : 1598 - 1605
  • [40] Changes in runoff and eco-flow in the Dongjiang River of the Pearl River Basin,China
    Kairong LIN
    Yanqing LIAN
    Xiaohong CHEN
    Fan LU
    Frontiers of Earth Science, 2014, 8 (04) : 547 - 557