Net-zero farming: Trigeneration with carbon capture and storage

被引:0
|
作者
Tang, Zhaozhao [1 ,2 ]
Vallabh, Davina [3 ]
Wang, Yaodong [3 ]
Huang, Ye [4 ]
Han, Jing-Cheng [1 ]
Zhou, Yang [1 ]
Wang, Linlin [1 ]
Ahmad, Muhammad [1 ]
Yousaf, Maryam [1 ]
Yuchen Wang [1 ]
Huang, Yuefei [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Water Science and Environmental Engineering Research Centre, College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen,518060, China
[2] State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing,100084, China
[3] Department of Engineering, Durham University, Durham,DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
[4] Belfast School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim, BT37 0QB, United Kingdom
[5] Laboratory of Ecological Protection and High Quality Development in the Upper Yellow River, School of Civil Engineering and Water Resources, Qinghai University, Xining,810016, China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon capture and storage - Carbon sequestration - Direct air capture - Zero-carbon;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2024.121898
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aiming to achieve net-zero farming, this study explores the potential of anaerobic digestion of various biowastes to produce biogas for meeting the energy demands of a dairy farm, including electricity, heating, and cooling. Two options were investigated: Option 1 focuses solely on meeting the farm's energy demand, while Option 2 focuses on a big system that utilizes all available biowastes to produce biogas, with surplus electricity sold back to grid. These options were modelled using ECLIPSE software and evaluated in terms of practicality, environmental impact, and economic viability. Option 2, employing trigeneration, achieved an overall efficiency of 80.0 %, significantly higher than Option 1's 48.4 %. However, the efficiencies of the combined heat and power (CHP) system for Option 1 and 2 were 62.2 % and 81.1 %, respectively, both higher than their corresponding trigeneration. Option 2 also produced a greater annual carbon dioxide offset of 4206 Ton CO2-eq compared to 299 Ton CO2-eq for Option 1 by leveraging digestive fertilizers and carbon capture and storage technology (CCS). Finally, it was found that the payback period for Option 1 was projected at 11 years while Option 2 would require 12 years, with anticipated profits of £124,900 and £891,900 for Options 1 and 2, respectively. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Time-Resolved Cost Analysis of Natural Gas Power Plant Conversion to Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage to Support Net-Zero Emissions
    Sproul, Evan
    Barlow, Jay
    Quinn, Jason C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (23) : 15338 - 15346
  • [42] Mitigating trade-offs between global food access and net-zero emissions: the potential contribution of direct air carbon capture and storage
    Ayami Hayashi
    Fuminori Sano
    Takashi Homma
    Keigo Akimoto
    Climatic Change, 2023, 176
  • [43] Accelerating net-zero carbon emissions by electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide
    Fan He
    Sirui Tong
    Zhouyang Luo
    Haoran Ding
    Ziye Cheng
    Chenxi Li
    Zhifu Qi
    Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2023, 79 (04) : 398 - 409
  • [44] Accelerating net-zero carbon emissions by electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide
    He, Fan
    Tong, Sirui
    Luo, Zhouyang
    Ding, Haoran
    Cheng, Ziye
    Li, Chenxi
    Qi, Zhifu
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY, 2023, 79 : 398 - 409
  • [45] Advances in the Net-Zero Paradigm and Resilience of Net-Zero Strategic Plans for Water Systems
    Connelly, Elizabeth B.
    Akanji, Jeremiah
    Goodsite, Michael Evan
    Kodack, Marc
    Mikkelsen, Kasper Dam
    Stoughton, Kate McMordie
    Lambert, James H.
    GREEN DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY: TRIPLE NET ZERO ENERGY, WATER AND WASTE MODELS AND APPLICATIONS, 2017, : 171 - 218
  • [46] Energy performance of net-zero and near net-zero energy homes in New England
    Thomas, Walter D.
    Duffy, John J.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2013, 67 : 551 - 558
  • [47] Net-zero Energy Systems Methodology and Benchmark for establishing Net-zero Energy Systems
    Richter, Marc
    Lombardi, Pio
    Komarnicki, Przemyslaw
    ATP MAGAZINE, 2021, (11-12): : 56 - 63
  • [48] Net-zero buildings: when carbon and energy metrics diverge
    Parkin, Anna
    Herrera, Manuel
    Coley, David A.
    BUILDINGS & CITIES, 2020, 1 (01): : 86 - 99
  • [49] Algal biopolymers as sustainable resources for a net-zero carbon bioeconomy
    Mohan, Aswathi
    Antony, Aiswarya Robert
    Greeshma, Kozhumal
    Yun, Jin-Ho
    Ramanan, Rishiram
    Kim, Hee-Sik
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 344
  • [50] We have to set net-zero carbon targets at scale
    Bolton, Derek
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2020, 245 (3274) : 31 - 31