Hybrid solutions for agricultural vehicles: A comparative life cycle analysis from the users' standpoint

被引:0
|
作者
Fargnoli, Mario [1 ]
Parrella, Emanuele [1 ]
Costantino, Francesco [2 ]
Tronci, Massimo [3 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Comp Control & Management Engn, Via Ariosto 25, I-00184 Rome, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
关键词
Hybrid agricultural vehicles; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Screening life cycle modelling (SLCM); Circular economy; Life cycle management; User scenarios; ENERGY MANAGEMENT STRATEGY; OF-THE-ART; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; LCA; TRACTOR; PRODUCT; TECHNOLOGIES; FRAMEWORK; DESIGN; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144406
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, the need to reduce fossil fuel consumption has triggered a push towards alternative solutions for more sustainable vehicles. This trend is stimulated by increasingly stringent regulations aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the transportation sector. However, in agriculture, the adoption of zero- emission vehicles (ZEVs) is not aligned with the trends seen in other sectors due to technological barriers. Currently, only a few prototypal solutions for hybrid tractors have emerged due to their advantages in battery size, weight, and cost compared to fully electric solutions. In the literature, few studies have examined the environmental performance of hybrid electric tractors (HETs), mainly comparing them to conventional models in terms of work performance. Conversely, the user perspective is scarcely addressed although users' needs vary significantly depending on farm dimensions and cultivation types. The study proposes an analysis of the environmental impact of a hybrid solution by comparing it with a diesel engine Stage V and one produced under the Stage IIIb requirements. The novelty of this paper results from combining the life cycle assessment (LCA) outputs with a scenario modelling framework to uncover the potential environmental impact of the three models considering different use scenarios. Such an approach goes beyond traditional LCA analyses by providing more detailed information on the practical environmental implications related to these propulsion units. The results show that depending on the user scenario, the hybrid solution is not always the least pollutant, thus requiring further research in the HET sector to better tailor technical solutions based on the target customer.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative life cycle assessment of sport utility vehicles with different fuel options
    Karaaslan, Enes
    Zhao, Yang
    Tatari, Omer
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (02): : 333 - 347
  • [42] Life cycle cost analysis of alternative vehicles and fuels in Belgium
    Turcksin, Laurence
    Macharis, Cathy
    Sergeant, Nele
    Mierlo, Joeri Van
    World Electric Vehicle Journal, 2009, 3 (02): : 255 - 270
  • [43] Life cycle cost analysis of alternative vehicles and fuels in Thailand
    Goedecke, Martin
    Therdthianwong, Supaporn
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (06) : 3236 - 3246
  • [44] Life-cycle analysis of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles
    Nansai, K
    Tohno, S
    Kono, M
    Kasahara, M
    Moriguchi, Y
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2001, 70 (03) : 251 - 265
  • [45] An assessment model and guidelines for multimedia computer recycling from the life cycle design standpoint
    Tu, J
    FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS DEGIGN AND INVERSE MANUFACTURING, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 740 - 745
  • [46] A Comparative Analysis of Energy Management Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicles
    Serrao, Lorenzo
    Onori, Simona
    Rizzoni, Giorgio
    JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2011, 133 (03):
  • [47] Hybrid biofuels from non-edible oils: A comparative standpoint with corresponding biodiesel
    Bora, Plaban
    Konwar, Lakhya Jyoti
    Boro, Jutika
    Phukan, Mayur Mausoom
    Deka, Dhanapati
    Konwar, Bolin Kumar
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 135 : 450 - 460
  • [48] Fuel Economy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Labeling for Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles from a Life Cycle Perspective
    MacPherson, Nathan D.
    Keoleian, Gregory A.
    Kelly, Jarod C.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 16 (05) : 761 - 773
  • [49] Comparative Study on Life Cycle CO2 Emissions from the Production of Electric and Conventional Vehicles in China
    Qiao, Qinyu
    Zhao, Fuquan
    Liu, Zongwei
    Jiang, Shuhua
    Hao, Han
    8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY (ICAE2016), 2017, 105 : 3584 - 3595
  • [50] Environmental impacts of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and battery electric vehicles—what can we learn from life cycle assessment?
    Anders Nordelöf
    Maarten Messagie
    Anne-Marie Tillman
    Maria Ljunggren Söderman
    Joeri Van Mierlo
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 : 1866 - 1890