Interaction between underwater explosion bubbles and soil-water interface: A numerical and experimental study

被引:0
|
作者
Yan, Fu-Huai [1 ]
Qiu, Yan-Yu [1 ]
Yue, Song-Lin [1 ]
Liu, Lu [1 ]
Wang, Jian-Ping [2 ]
Gao, Xing-Kai [1 ]
机构
[1] Army Engn Univ PLA, State Key Lab Disaster Prevent & Mitigat Explos &, Nanjing 210007, Peoples R China
[2] Unit 91053 PLA, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
关键词
SIMULATION; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1063/5.0225202
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
To explore the interaction between underwater explosion bubbles and soil-water interface, a near soil-water interface underwater explosion model based on the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method was established in this work. The peak pressure of the shock wave, maximum bubble radius, and bubble evolution in free-field and bottom-charge underwater explosions determined from the proposed simulation were highly consistent with the experimental results, thereby validating the proposed numerical model. The effects of the explosion distance and amount of explosive charge on the bubble-soil surface interaction were evaluated. The results showed that the reflection coefficient of the soil-water interface was in the range of 1.204-1.250, suggesting that it was hardly affected by the explosion distance and amount of explosive charge. The attenuation coefficient of the saturated soil was found to be 1.058. With the decrease in the explosion distance, the period and maximum radius of the bubbles slightly increased, and soil deformation increased as the lower surface of the bubbles was closer to the soil surface. For explosion distances of 0.3 and 0.4 m, only an overall movement of the soil surface was observed. When the explosion distance was 0.2 m or lower, a powerful downward jet was generated upon the pulsation of the first bubble, resulting in craters and slender depressions in the soil. With the increase in the amount of explosive charge, the period and maximum radius of the bubbles increased, and soil deformation also increased. These findings are expected to help advance our understanding of underwater explosion dynamics.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Numerical study on underwater contact explosion of ships
    Yao, Xiongliang
    Yang, Wenshan
    Chu, Wenhua
    Ming, Furen
    Jisuan Wuli/Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2010, 27 (06): : 840 - 846
  • [42] Experimental investigations of the soil-water characteristics of a volcanic soil
    Ng, CWW
    Pang, YW
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 37 (06) : 1252 - 1264
  • [43] Experimental research into the dynamics of underwater explosion bubbles near mutually perpendicular walls
    Yan, Ze-Chen
    Wang, Ming-Yang
    Zhao, Yue-Tang
    Qiu, Yan-Yu
    Yue, Song-Lin
    Wang, Jian-Ping
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2024, 36 (05)
  • [44] Numerical simulation of soil-water interaction using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method
    Bui, Ha H.
    Sako, K.
    Fukagawa, R.
    JOURNAL OF TERRAMECHANICS, 2007, 44 (05) : 339 - 346
  • [45] Experimental Investigation of the Interaction between Rising Bubbles and Swirling Water Flow
    Uchiyama, Tomomi
    Sasaki, Shunsuke
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 2014
  • [46] Numerical Simulation of Icebreaking by Underwater-Explosion Bubbles and Compressed-Gas Bubbles Based on the ALE Method
    Yu, Zerui
    Ni, Bao-Yu
    Wu, Qigang
    Wang, Zuocheng
    Liu, Peng
    Xue, Yanzhuo
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [47] Analysis of the Metals in Soil-Water Interface in a Manganese Mine
    Ren, Bozhi
    Wang, Qian
    Chen, Yangbo
    Ding, Wenjie
    Zheng, Xie
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL METHODS IN CHEMISTRY, 2015, 2015
  • [48] Experimental study on vapor explosion caused by interaction between high temperature molten aluminum and water
    刘雨
    吕中杰
    黄风雷
    郭学永
    沈正祥
    Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2014, 23 (02) : 147 - 151
  • [49] Experimental Study on Soil-Water Retention Properties of Compacted Expansive Clay
    Sarker, Debojit
    Wang, Jay X.
    ADVANCES IN TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS IV, VOL 3, 2022, 166 : 433 - 445