Fuel Efficiency Optimization in Adaptive Cruise Control: A Comparative Study of Model Predictive Control-Based Approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Borneo, Angelo [1 ]
Miretti, Federico [1 ]
Misul, Daniela Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] DENERG—Department of Energy Galileo Ferraris, CARS@Polito—Center for Automotive Research and Sustainable Mobility, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, Torino,10129, Italy
来源
Applied Sciences (Switzerland) | 2024年 / 14卷 / 21期
关键词
Adaptive control systems - Benchmarking - Dynamic programming - Predictive control systems;
D O I
10.3390/app14219833
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This work investigates the fuel efficiency potential of Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) systems, focusing on two optimization-based control approaches for internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. In particular, this study compares two model predictive control (MPC) designs. In the first approach, a strictly quadratic cost is adopted, and fuel consumption is indirectly minimized by adjusting the weights assigned to state tracking and control effort. In the second approach, a fuel consumption map is explicitly included in the MPC cost function, aiming to directly minimize it. Both approaches are compared to a globally optimal benchmark obtained with dynamic programming. Although these methods have been discussed in the literature, no systematic comparison of their relative performance has been conducted, which is the primary contribution of this article. The results demonstrate that, with proper tuning, the simpler quadratic approach can achieve comparable fuel savings to the approach with explicit fuel consumption minimization, with a maximum variation of 0.5%. These results imply that the first alternative is more suitable for online implementation, due to the more favorable characteristics of the associated optimization problem. © 2024 by the authors.
引用
下载
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nonlinear Model Predictive Control approach in design of Adaptive Cruise Control with automated switching to cruise control
    Shakouri, Payman
    Ordys, Andrzej
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2014, 26 : 160 - 177
  • [22] Dynamic Programming for Model Predictive Control of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems
    Lin, Yu-Chen
    Hsu, Hsiang-Chieh
    Chen, Wen-Jen
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VEHICULAR ELECTRONICS AND SAFETY (ICVES), 2015, : 202 - 207
  • [23] A model predictive control approach to design a parameterized adaptive cruise control
    Naus G.J.L.
    Ploeg J.
    Van De Molengraft M.J.G.
    Heemels W.P.M.H.
    Steinbuch M.
    Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, 2010, 402 : 273 - 284
  • [24] A Model Predictive Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Approach
    Stanger, Thomas
    del Re, Luigi
    2013 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2013, : 1374 - 1379
  • [25] Model predictive control of transitional maneuvers for adaptive cruise control vehicles
    Baghwar, VL
    Garrard, WL
    Rajamani, R
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 53 (05) : 1573 - 1585
  • [26] Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Algorithms for Vehicular Platoons Based on Distributed Model Predictive Control
    Tapli, Tugba
    Akar, Mehmet
    2020 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ADVANCED MOTION CONTROL (AMC), 2020, : 305 - 310
  • [27] Energy-Optimal Adaptive Cruise Control in Time Domain based on Model Predictive Control
    Jia, Yanzhao
    Saito, Tomohiro
    Itoh, Yutaro
    Nukezhanov, Yernar
    Goerges, Daniel
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (31): : 846 - 853
  • [28] Model Predictive Control-Based Reinforcement Learning
    Han, Qiang
    Boussaid, Farid
    Bennamoun, Mohammed
    2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, ISCAS 2024, 2024,
  • [29] Adaptive model predictive control-based attitude and trajectory tracking of a VTOL aircraft
    Emami, Seyyed Ali
    Rezaeizadeh, Amin
    IET CONTROL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 12 (15): : 2031 - 2042
  • [30] Extension and Experimental Validation of Fuel Efficient Predictive Adaptive Cruise Control
    Schmied, Roman
    Waschl, Harald
    del Re, Luigi
    2015 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2015, : 4753 - 4758