Enterprise value portfolio selection methodology using simulation

被引:0
|
作者
Gu, Seung-Hwan [1 ]
Noh, Seung-Min [1 ]
Kim, Doo-Suk [1 ]
Jang, Seong-Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
关键词
Enterprise values - Performance measurements - Portfolio - Portfolio selection - Realistic scenario - Selection criteria - Simulation analysis - Stock;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-662-45289-9_30
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, the ‘Value Score Method’ is proposed to evaluate the corporate value portfolio by using values that affect corporate value. Using a simulation analysis, this paper considers the results of six scenarios consisting of various selection criteria (5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13 point). The performance measurements are the number of selected companies and the ‘rate of return.’ The results indicate that scenario 2 consisting of the 7-point value score displayed the highest rate of return but was identified as having significant difficulty in real world application because many management companies are faced with the problem of specific companies generating this rate of return. Thus, the scenario 3consiting 10 point value is the most realistic scenario and the good rate of return in the model. In addition, scenario 7 was set as the combination of scenario 1 consisting of the 5-point value in the down market and scenario 2 consisting of the 7-point value in the up market. Scenario 7 applied to the intersection of the reference point showed a higher cumulative return of 5,276.2% as compared with scenario 2 with an average of 190.4 companies selected. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 355
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal portfolio selection in a Value-at-Risk framework
    Campbell, R
    Huisman, R
    Koedijk, K
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2001, 25 (09) : 1789 - 1804
  • [32] Fuzzy Portfolio Selection based on Value-at-Risk
    Wang, Bo
    Wang, Shuming
    Watada, Junzo
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2009), VOLS 1-9, 2009, : 1840 - 1845
  • [33] Dynamic Portfolio Selection with Relative Value at Risk Constraint
    Wang, Xiuguo
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 9807 - 9810
  • [34] Simulation System Design Methodology in Extended Enterprise Context
    Leroux-Beaudout, Renan
    Bruel, Jean-Michel
    Ober, Ileana
    Pantel, Marc
    Insight, 2021, 24 (04) : 38 - 42
  • [35] Formation and selection methodology of digital transformations programs for an industrial enterprise using machine learning algorithms
    Lukina, S., V
    Makarov, V. V.
    Dobrolyubova, M. F.
    Krutyakova, M., V
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODERN TRENDS IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES AND EQUIPMENT (ICMTMTE) 2020, 2020, 971
  • [36] Portfolio selection using genetic algorithms
    Ozdemir, Muhsin
    IKTISAT ISLETME VE FINANS, 2011, 26 (299): : 43 - 66
  • [37] Portfolio selection using neural networks
    Fernandez, Alberto
    Gomez, Sergio
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2007, 34 (04) : 1177 - 1191
  • [38] Portfolio selection using the Riskiness Index
    Nisani, Doron
    STUDIES IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2018, 35 (02) : 330 - 339
  • [39] PORTFOLIO SELECTION - A SIMULATION OF TRUST INVESTMENT - CLARKSON,GPE
    FARRAR, DE
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1963, 36 (02): : 254 - 256
  • [40] Enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation using the value engineering methodology and Six Sigma tools
    Leu, Jun-Der
    Lee, Larry Jung-Hsing
    ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2017, 11 (08) : 1243 - 1261