Data quality and uncertainty assessment of life cycle inventory data for composites

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] [1,Balcioglu, Gulizar
[2] Fitzgerald, Amy M.
[3] Rodes, Ffion A.M.
[4] 1,Allen, Stephen R.
关键词
Glass fibers;
D O I
10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.112021
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is an increasingly common method for assessing the environmental impact of products. For both novel and established composite materials, the quality and uncertainty of LCA data varies across sources, and there is a particular paucity of data for novel materials which can inhibit their adoption in favour of more established materials. After reviewing available LCA datasets for the constituent materials of composites, this study analyses life cycle greenhouse gas emissions datasets for a sample of materials – glass fibre, carbon fibre, and epoxide resin – and assesses the data quality and uncertainty across their sources. The results revealed major discrepancies in the datasets for the production of composites are summarised and presented via a colour-coded visual to aid interpretation and transparently select the most appropriate dataset for the LCA. The study highlights the importance of giving more attention to composite datasets in the future and advises that the process of selecting the most representative values should be approached with caution. © 2024 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of life cycle inventory data for recycling systems
    Brogaard, Line K.
    Damgaard, Anders
    Jensen, Morten B.
    Barlaz, Morton
    Christensen, Thomas H.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2014, 87 : 30 - 45
  • [32] Review of inventory data in life cycle assessment applied in production of fresh tomato in greenhouse
    Pineda, Israel Torres
    Lee, Young Duk
    Kim, Young Sang
    Lee, Sang Min
    Park, Kyoung Sub
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 282
  • [33] Elementary flow mapping across life cycle inventory data systems: A case study for data interoperability under the Global Life Cycle Assessment Data Access (GLAD) initiative
    Valente, Antonio
    Vadenbo, Carl
    Fazio, Simone
    Shobatake, Koichi
    Edelen, Ashley
    Sonderegger, Thomas
    Karkour, Selim
    Kusche, Oliver
    Diaconu, Edward
    Ingwersen, Wesley W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (05): : 789 - 802
  • [34] The creation, management, and use of data quality information for life cycle assessment
    Ashley Edelen
    Wesley W. Ingwersen
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 759 - 772
  • [35] The creation, management, and use of data quality information for life cycle assessment
    Edelen, Ashley
    Ingwersen, Wesley W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (04): : 759 - 772
  • [36] Big Data in Life Cycle Assessment
    Cooper, Joyce
    Noon, Michael
    Jones, Chris
    Kahn, Ezra
    Arbuckle, Peter
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 17 (06) : 796 - 799
  • [37] Correction: Elementary flow mapping across life cycle inventory data systems: A case study for data interoperability under the global life cycle assessment data access (GLAD) initiative
    Antonio Valente
    Carl Vadenbo
    Simone Fazio
    Koichi Shobatake
    Ashley Edelen
    Thomas Sonderegger
    Selim Karkour
    Oliver Kusche
    Edward Diaconu
    Wesley W. Ingwersen
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2025, 30 (1) : 200 - 200
  • [38] Representing and visualizing data uncertainty in input-output life cycle assessment models
    Chen, Xiaoju
    Griffin, W. Michael
    Matthews, H. Scott
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 137 : 316 - 325
  • [39] The Assessment of the Uncertainty of Updated Stand-Level Inventory Data
    Haara, Arto
    Leskinen, Pekka
    SILVA FENNICA, 2009, 43 (01) : 87 - 112
  • [40] Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories
    Mark A. J. Huijbregts
    Gregory Norris
    Rolf Bretz
    Andreas Ciroth
    Benoit Maurice
    Bo von Bahr
    Bo Weidema
    Angeline S. H. de Beaufort
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2001, 6 : 127 - 132